Korean Journal of Breeding Science (한국육종학회지)

The Korean Society of Breeding Science (한국육종학회)
권호 표지

Anther Culture Efficiency affected by Growth Condition and Pre-treatment Methods in Barley

보리 생육환경 및 전처리 방법별 약배양 효율

  • Park, Tae Il (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS of RDA) ;
  • Kim, Young Jin (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS of RDA) ;
  • Jeoung, Sun Ok (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS of RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Soon (International Technology Cooperation Center RDA) ;
  • Seo, Jae Hwan (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS of RDA) ;
  • Yun, Song Joong (Division of Biological Resources Science, and Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2008.01.11
  • Published : 2008.03.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to improve the anther culture efficiency of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Callus induction rates from anther cultures of the five domestic naked barley and four unhulled varieties ranged from 0 to 5.6%, and plant regeneration rate to callus was 30.4% in the donor plants grown in a greenhouse during winter, among which the green plant regeneration rates ranged from 0 to 4.4%. Plant regeneration rate was 30.4% in the donor plants grown in a greenhouse during winter, whereas 21.3% in the normal field condition in spring. In addition, callus induction rates were 19.2% in plants grown in a normal field and 7.2% in drought-stressed condition, respectively. Being Considered the anther culture efficiency affected by the sampling time, the optimum sampling stage of anthers was 3~4 days before heading when the length between the 1st and 2nd auricles reaches 5 to 10 cm and at the uninucleate of pollen which the tip of the 2nd auricle aligns with the middle of panicle in the leaf sheath. Best callus induction rates came from the anthers stored at $4^{\circ}C$ for 3 weeks in a 10 to 15 cm diameter polyethylene bag with 5 to 10 panicles and Duwonchapssalbori and Saessalbori showed the higher induction rate of 4.8% and 1.7%, respectively.

본 실험은 보리 약배양에서 모식물체의 생육환경과 전처리 방법에 따른 배양효율을 검토코자 수행되었다. 캘러스 유기정도는 품종에 따라 0~5.6%의 범위를 보였고 식물체 분화율은 캘러스 대비 0~30.0%이었으나 그중 녹색체는 0~4.4%로 낮았다. 동절기 온실과 춘계포장에서 각각 재배한 모식물체의 약배양 캘러스 유기율은 춘계포장 모식물체의 약에서 많았지만 식물체 분화율은 각각 30.4%와 21.3%로 동절기 온실시료의 배양에서 높게 나타났다. 또한 정상상태에서 자란 모식물체와 신장기에 한발 스트레스를 받은 모식물체의 캘러스 유기율은 각각 19.2%와 7.2%로서 약유래 모식물체의 생육환경에 따라 큰 차이를 보였다. 약 채취 시기는 외형적인 식물체의 엽이간장이 5~10 cm정도로 지엽 다음 엽의 엽이와 엽초 내 이삭의 가장 불룩한 중앙부위가 일치하는 시기(출수전 3~4일)를 기준으로 약을 선별하여 치상 하는 것이 유기효율이 높았다 전처리는 직경 10cm의 롤(roll) 비닐봉지에 5~10개체의 이삭을 밀봉하여 $4^{\circ}C$에서 4 3주간 실시하는 것이 효과적이었으며 관행 페트리디쉬 보관에 비하여 약 6배 정도의 노력절감효과를 보였다 전처리 기간 및 온도별 시료의 상태는 $4^{\circ}C$에서 4주까지, $7^{\circ}C$는 2주까지, $10^{\circ}C$는 1주까지 신선도 유지가 가능하였고, 전처리 기간은 $4^{\circ}C$, 3주에서 두원찹쌀보리(2조)와 새쌀보리(6조)조가 각각 4.8%, 1.7%의 캘러스가 유기되어 가장 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe,T. and Y. Fatsuhara. 1985. Genetic analysis of callus formation and plant regeneration in rice. J.J.C.B. Symposium pp. 46-47
  2. Cheong, G. S. and J.G. Sohn. 1986. Haploid breeding by anther and pollen culture. Kyungbuk University Symposium(s) 11-30
  3. Clapham, D. 1973. Haploid Hordeum plants from anthers in vitro. Z. Pflanzenzuchtg 69:142-155
  4. Clapham, D. 1977. Haploid induction in cereals. In 'Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture' (J.Reinert and Y.P.S.Bajaj, eds.) pp. 279-298
  5. Dale, P. J. 1975. Pollen dimorphism and anther culture in barley. Planta 127:213-220 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380718
  6. Foroughi-wear, B. and G. Mix. 1979. In vitro response of Hordeum vulgare L. anther cultured from plants grown under different environments. Environ. Exp. Bot. 16:109-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(76)90002-2
  7. Gabriela Trejo-Tapia, Uriel Maldonado Amaya, Guadalupe Salcedo Morales, Antonia De JesusSanchez, Blanca Martinez Bonfil, Mario Rodriguez-Monroy and Antonio Jimenez Aparicio. 2002. The effects of cold - pretreatment, auxins and carbon source on anther culture of rice. Plant cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 71:41-46 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016558025840
  8. Genovesi, A. D. and G.O. Collins. 1982. In vitro production of haploid plants of corn via anther culture. Crop Sci. 22:1137-1144 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200060013x
  9. Hornor, M., and H. E. Street. 1978. Pollen dimorphismorigin and significance in pollen plant formation by anther culture. Ann. Bot. 42:763-771 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085515
  10. Huang, B. and N. Sunderland. 1982. Temperature-stress pretreatment in barley anther culture. Ann. Bot. 49:77-88 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086232
  11. Huang, B. and N. Sunderland. 1985. Influence of cold pretreatment on the production of pollen callus in anther cultures of barley. Acta Botanica Sinica. 27(3):439-443
  12. Huh, C. G. 1986. Effect of cold shock on the green plant frequency in rice anther culture. Thesis of MS. National Seoul Univ. p.44
  13. Hur, H. S. 1987. Improvement of culture efficiency and practical use in anther culture of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Thesis of Ph. Kyung pook National Univ. p:60
  14. Kang, T. J. 1996. Plant Regeneration from Anther Culture of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestiuum L.). Korean J. Plant Tissue Culture. 23(6) 367-370
  15. Kweon, Soon-Jong, Duck-Yong Suh, Hyung-Soo Suh and Gun-Sik Chung. 1989. Study of anther culture in barley. 1. Difference between varieties, medium phase and type of explant at cold treatment in callus induction. Res. Rept. RDA(U&I). 31(2):40-44
  16. Lazer, M. D., G. W. Schaeffer and P. S. Baenziger. 1984. Cultivar and cultivar environment effects on the development of callus and poly haploid plants from anther cultures of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:273-277 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317054
  17. Lee, S. Y. 1987. Effect of pollen dimorphism and growth environment of donor plant on anther culture in rice. Ph. thesis. Won Kwang Univ. p. 95
  18. Marsolais, A. A., G. Seguin-Swartz, and K. J. Kasha. 1984. The influence of anther cold pretreatments and donor plant genotypes on in vitro androgenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 3:69-79 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035922
  19. Park, K. G., Y. S. Kang, J. Y. Choi and K. M. Toon. 1994. Morphological Indicator for optimal stage of microspore in triticale anther culture. Korean J. Breed. 26(3):271-275
  20. Pellegrineschi A., L.M. Noguera, B. Skovmand, R.M. Brito, L. Velazquez, M.M. Salgado, R. Hernandez, M. Warburton, and D. Hoinsington. 2002. Identification of highly transformable wheat genotypes for mass production of fertile transgenic plants. Genome 45: 421-430 https://doi.org/10.1139/g01-154
  21. Phil Bregitzer 1992. Plant regeneration and callus type in Barley: Effect of Genotype and Culture Medium. Crop Sci. 32:1108-1112 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200050007x
  22. Rownak Afza, Mei shen, F. J. Zapata-Arias. 2000. Effect of spikelet position on rice anther culture efficiency. Plant science. 153:155-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00266-6
  23. Sirkka Immonen and Hanna Anttila. 1998. Impact of microspore developmental stage on induction and plant regeneration in rye anther culture. Plant Science 139:213-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00191-5
  24. Sunderland, N., M. Roberts, L. J. Evans, and D. C. Wildon, 1979. Multicellular pollen formation in cultuered barley anthers. I. Independent division of the generative and vegetative cells. J. Exp. Bot. 30:1133-1144 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/30.6.1133
  25. Sunderland, N., M. Roberts, L. J. Evans, and D. C. Wildon, and L, J, Evans. 1980. Multicellular pollen formation in cultered barley anthers. II.The A-pathway, B-patway and C-pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 31:501-514 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/31.2.501
  26. Wenzel, G., B. Foroughi-Wehr, W. Friedt, F. Kohler, and T. Oo. 1984. Cell and tissue culture as supplementary tool in plant breeding: Exemplified in potato, oilseed rape and barley. Hereditas Supp Vol. 3:15-25
  27. Wenzel, G., B. Foroughi-Wehr, W. Friedt, F. Kohler, and T. Oo., F. Hoffmann, and E. Thomas. 1977. Increased induction and chromosome doubling of androgenetic haploid rye. Theor. Appl. Genet. 51:81-86 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299481