한국 콩 품종의 초형관련 형질의 특성

Canopy-Related Characteristics of Korean Soybean Cultivars

  • 김홍식 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 이구환 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 송항림 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 김성진 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 허건 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 우선희 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 정승근 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학)
  • Kim, Hong-Sig (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Ku-Hwan (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Hang-Lin (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Jin (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hur, Gun (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Woo, Sun-Hee (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jong, Seung-Keun (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2008.06.11
  • 발행 : 2008.06.10

초록

1913년부터 2000년까지 국내에서 육성된 70품종에 대한 초형형질에 관련된 주경, 분지 및 엽형질의 특성을 파악하여 다수성 콩 품종개발의 기초자료로 이용코자 하였다. 1. 초형형질의 변이는 주경과 분지관련형질의 12개 형질 중에서 초형폭, 분지장 및 초형폭/장 비율이 컸으며, 엽관련 8개형질 중에서는 엽병각, 엽장폭비 및 엽건물중이 컸다. 2. 용도별로 초형폭/장 비율은 밥밑콩이 장류 및 두부용콩과 나물콩에 비하여 높았고 장류 및 두부용콩과 나물콩은 큰 차이가 없었다.총분지장/주경장 비율은 나물콩과 밥밑콩이 높았고 장류 및 두부용콩이 낮았다. 3. 주경과 분지형질은 초형폭/장 비율과 총분지장/ 주경장 비율에 의하여 각각 그룹으로 분류되어졌고, 협초폭형이며 주경의존형은 단원콩, 금강콩, 셀비 및 신팔달콩이었고, 협초폭형이며 분지의존형은 소명콩이었다. 광초폭형이면서 주경의존형은 강림, 금강대립 및 진율콩이었으며, 광초폭형이면서 분지의존형은 검정콩 2호이었다. 4. 용도별로 소엽장/폭 비율은 밥밑콩이 작았고 장류 및 두부용콩과 나물콩과는 큰차이가 없었으며, 복엽의 엽면적은 밥밑콩이 가장 컸고 나물콩이 가장 작았다. 엽병장은 나물콩이 작았으며 장류 및 두부용콩과 밥밑콩은 큰 차이가 없었고, 엽병각은 밥밑콩이 가장 컸고 나물콩이 가장 작았다. 5. 엽형태는 엽장폭비와 엽면적에 의하여 각각 4그룹으로 분류 되어졌고, 소엽장폭비가 큰 원엽이면서 엽면적이 큰 대형엽은 부석과 대황콩이었고, 엽장폭비가 극세엽이면서 엽면적이 작은 소형엽은 은하콩과 소호콩이었다. 6. 엽병의 특성은 엽병장과 엽병각에 의하여 각각 3그룹과 4그룹으로 분류 되어졌고, 엽병장이 짧고 엽병각이 작은 품종은 은하콩이었고, 엽병장이 짧고 엽병각이 큰 품종은 알찬콩, 무한콩 및 푸른콩이었으며, 엽병장이 길고 엽병각이 작은 품종은 신팔달콩 2호이었다. 7. 은하콩은 전 시험품종 중에서 엽장폭비가 가장 큰 극세엽이면서 엽면적이 가장 작은 소형엽이었고, 엽병장이 가장 짧으며 엽병각이 가장 작은 품종이었다.

This study was conducted to obtain basic information on mainstem, branch and leaf characteristics related to canopy for development of high yielding cultivar using 70 Korean soybean cultivars developed from 1913 to 2000. Variations of canopy width, branch length, and canopy width/length ratio were higher compared to other characteristics among 12 mainstem and branch characters. Variations of petiole angle, leaflet width/length ratio and compound leaf dry weight were higher than other characteristics among eight leaf characters related to plant canopy. Three classifications of soybean cultivars were used based on usage: I)soy sauce and tofu, II)bean sprout, and III)cooking with rice. Canopy width/length ratio was higher in group III, cooking with rice than group I, soy sauce and tofu, and group II, bean sprout, and there was no difference between the two, group I and group II. The total branch length/main stem height ratio was higher in group II, bean sprout and group III, cooking with rice than group I, soy sauce and tofu. Mainstem and branch characteristics related to plant canopy were classified into four groups by ratio of canopy width/length and total branch length/main stem length, respectively. Soybean cultivars with narrow canopy and high dependence of mainstem were Danweonkong, Keumkangkong, Shelby, and Shinpaldalkong. Soybean cultivars with broad canopy and high dependence of mainstem were Kanglim, Keumkangdaelip, and Jinyulkong, and a cultivar with broad canopy and high dependence of branch were Geomjeongkong 2. Leaflet length/width ratio was lowest in cooking with rice and there was no difference between soy sauce and tofu and bean sprout. Compound leaf area was largest in cooking with rice and smallest in bean sprout. Leaf petiole length was short in bean sprout and there was no difference between soy sauce and tofu and bean sprout. Leaf petiole angle was highest in cooking with rice and lowest in bean sprout. Leaf type was classified into four groups based on leaflet width/length ratio and compound leaf area, respectivly. Buseok and Taekwangkong had an oval leaflet and largest area of compound leaf. Eunhakong and Sohokong had extreme narrow leaflet and smallest area of compound leaf. Leaf petiole type was classified into three and four groups based on leaf petiole length and angle, respectively. A soybean cultivar with the shortest petiole length and smallest petiole angle was Eunhakong and cultivars with short petiole length and large petiole angle were Alchankong, Muhankong, and Pureunkong. A soybean cultivar with long petiole length and small petiole angle was Sinpaldalkong 2. Among a total of 70 Korean soybean cultivars, Eunhakong had an extreme narrow type in leaf, smallest compound leaf area, shortest petiole length, and smallest petiole angle of compound leaf.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 충북대학교

참고문헌

  1. Ambel J, Ninomiya S, Takahashi N. 1997. Fuzzy logic evaluation of soybean plant shape. Breeding Science 47:253-257
  2. Ariga T. 1943. Classification of soybean varieties according to plant type. Agri. and Hort. 18:69-670
  3. Blad BL, Baker DG. 1972. Orientation and distribution of leaves within soybean canopies. Agron.J. 64:26-29 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400010009x
  4. Chang KY, KimJH, Kwon CS. 1991. Combining ability and correlation of some quantitative characters of F1 hybrids in soybeans. Korean J.Breed. 22(4):367-373
  5. Egli DB, Pendleton Jw, Peters DB. 1970. Photosynthetic rate of three soybean communities as related to carbon dioxide levels sand solar radiation. Agron.J. 62:411-414 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200030031x
  6. Foroutan-pour K, Dutilleul P, Smith DL. 1999. Soybean canopy development as affected by population density and intercropping with corn: Fractal analysis in comparision with other quantitative approaches. Crop Sci. 39:1784-1791 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961784x
  7. Haile FJ, Higley LG, Specht JE, Spomer SM. 1998. Soybean leaf Morphology and defoliation tolerance. Agron.J. 90:353-362 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000030007x
  8. Hiebsch CK, Kanemasu ET, Nickell CD. 1976. Effects of soybean leaflet type on net carbon dioxide exchange, water use, and water use efficiency. Can.J.plant Sci. 56:455-458 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps76-075
  9. IBPGR. 1984. Descriptors for soybean. IBPGR Secretariat, Rome Italy. pp. 38
  10. Isoda A, Yoshimura T, Ishikawa T. 1994. Solar radiation penetration and distribution in soybean communities. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 63(2):298-304 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.63.298
  11. Jeong JH, Hwang YH, Kim DU. 2000. Branch related characteristics of Korean soybean varieties. Korean J.Breed. 32(1):38-44
  12. Kokubun, M. 2001. Physiological approaches for increasing soybean yield potential. Jpn. J.Crop Sci. 70(3):341-351 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.70.341
  13. Kokubun M. 1988. Design and evaluation of soybean ideotypes. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 77:77-142
  14. Kokubun M, Shimada S. 1994. Diurnal change of photosynthesis and its relation to yield in soybean cultivars. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 63:305-312 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.63.305
  15. Kokubun, M, Watanabe K. 1982. Analysis of the yielddetermining process of field-grown soybeans in relation to canpy structure. 2. Effect of plant type alteration on solar radiation interception and yield components. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 51:51-57 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.51.51
  16. Lee, Y.H. and Huang YK. 1997. Variation of Leaflet Traits and Their Association with Agronomic Traits of Soybean Germplasm. Korean J. Crop Sci. 42(5):640-646
  17. Nagata T. 1950. Studies on characteristics of soybean varieties. Society of Japan soybean. Tokyo. pp 115
  18. Nakamura S, Basa I, Takahashi K. 1994. Characteristcs of leaflets of soybean cultivar. Tohoku Journal of Crop Science 37:69-70
  19. Nakamura S, Koyama T, Watanabe I, Sasaki K. 1981. Varietal grouping of soybeans according to the branching direction and its response to planting pattern. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 65:59-71
  20. Nakamura S, Matsumoto S, Watanabe I. 1979. Comparision of characteristics between new and old soybean varieties recommended in Tohoku district. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 60:151-160
  21. Nakaseko K. 1988. Productivity of a dwarf type soybean induced by mechanical stimulation applied during vegetative stage. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 57:782-789 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.57.782
  22. Ninomiya S, Cong VN. 1998. Evaluation of soybean plant shape based on tree-based models. Breeding Science 48:251-255
  23. Ninomiya S, Oide M, Takahashi N. 1998. Fuzzy-Logic Search Engine for Soybean Shape Data. Jpn.J.Crop. Sci. 67:104-108 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.67.104
  24. Ninomiya S, Shigemori I. 1991. Quantitative evaluation of soybean(Glycine max L. Merr) plant shape by image analysis. Jpn.J.Breed. 41:485-497 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.41.485
  25. Oide M, Morinaga S, Ninomiya S. 1996. Selection method of supervisor data set to develop neural network evaluator on soybean plant shape. J.Jass 12(10:13-20)
  26. Okabe A, Kikuchi A, Satura M. 2006. Comparision of past and recently developed soybean cultivars in western region of Japan. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 75(3):327-334 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.75.327
  27. Pearce RB, Brown RH, Blaser RE. 1967. Photosynthesis in plant communities as influenced by leaf angle. Crop Sci. 7:321-324 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700040012x
  28. Purcell LC. 2000. Soybean canopy covage and light interception measurements using digital image. Crop Sci. 40:834-837 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403834x
  29. Shaw RH, Weber CR. 1967. Effects of canopy arrangement on light interception and yield of soybeans. Agron.J. 59:501-505
  30. Silvakumar MVK. Tayler HM, Shaw RH. 1977. Top and root relations of field grown soybean. Agron.J. 69:470-473 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900030034x
  31. Watanabe I. Konno S, Tabuchi K. 1975. Revised standard of examination for plant type of soybean. Proc. Crop Sci. Japan. 44(4):479-480 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.44.479
  32. Wells R, Schulze LL, Ashley DA, Boerma HR, Brown RH. 1982. Cultivar difference in canopy apparent photossynthesis and their relationship to seed yield in soybeans. Crop Sci. 22:886-890 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200040044x
  33. Wilcox JR. 2001. Sisty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines. Crop Sci. 49:1711-1716