Comparative Study of the National Policies for Korean Oriental Medicine and Traditional Chinese Medicine

한의학과 중의학에 대한 국가정책 비교연구

  • Lee, Hyun-Ji (Faculty of Liberal Education, Keimyung University)
  • Published : 2008.10.25

Abstract

The structure of medical profession is composed of multiple relations among state, patients, and medical professions. There are conflicts between the nation and medical professions because the nation controls the monopoly of medical professions through medical policies. Patients make relations with medical profession as medical consumers. And medical professions compete each other in order to gain the control of the medical market. This paper attempts to review the dynamic relations between the nation and medical professions. The medical professions and the nation are in conflict about the control of the autonomy of medical professions. The medical professions want to exercise the monopoly rights in their own area and, on the other had, the nation wants to prevent problems that might result from the monopoly by regulations and to have the control over the national operation. Given this, the common view of medical sociology is that the nation and the medical professions are in constant conflict. The arguments that the present medical sociology has on the relationship between the nation and medical professions can be summarized like these: first, the nation is the authenticator of medical system; second, the nation is a medical provider and consumer; and, third, the nation is a mediator of regulations and conflicts. Based on the above mentioned relations between the nation and medical professions, this paper attempts to see how the nation, which is one component of the medical structure, make influences on Korean Oriental doctors and Traditional Chinese doctors. So as to do this, the changes in medical policies and promoting policies for Korean Oriental medicine and Traditional Chinese medicine are analyzed. Finally, the differences in national policies of Korean Oriental medicine and Traditional Chinese medicine are compared.

Keywords

References

  1. 金奎原․李炫知. 關于專業化以及專門職業組織發展的硏究. 華夏醫藥, 8(1):31-33, 2004
  2. 조병희. 질병과 의료의 사회학. 집문당, 2006
  3. 이현지. 동아시아 전통의학의 현대화, 한국학술정보, 2008
  4. 이상일. 복지국가의 발전과 정부-의사집단의 관계에 관한 연구. 경제와 사회, (66):177-206, 2005
  5. 신중완. 日帝侵略以後부터 1960年代初까지의 韓方醫療制度 變遷史에 關한 考察. 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, (2):37-46, 1988
  6. 신동원. 1910년대 일제의 보건의료 정책-한의학 정책을 중심으로. 한국문화, (30):33-370, 2002
  7. 이종효. 韓方醫療政策의 어제와 오늘. 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, (2):47-53, 1988
  8. 이현지. 한국 한의학의 전문화 과정에 관한 연구. 계명대학교 박사학위논문(미간행), 2000
  9. 한의신문. 2008년 5월 31일자
  10. 보건복지가족부 한의약산업과. 한방치료기술 연구개발 사업 중장기 발전계획('08-'17) 요약. 2008
  11. 보건복지부. 한방의료기관 평가제도. 보건복지부, 2007
  12. 賈謙. 中醫戰略. 中醫古籍出版社, 2007
  13. 曹荣桂 主编. 卫生部历史考证.人民卫生出版社,1998
  14. 賈謙. 中醫戰略. 中醫古籍出版社, 2007
  15. 佚名. 中药行业08策略. http://www.chn-huatuo.com/xdzy/xdzy/zyyj/200801/44347.html, 2008
  16. 中医药事业发展"十一五"规划. http://cn.chinagate.com.cn/economics/2007-02/01/content_2365468.htm, 2008
  17. 科技部. 中医药创新发展规划纲要(2006-2020年). www.most.gov.cn, 2007
  18. 國家中医药管理局. 2007年中医药工作要点. 国中医药发, 2007
  19. 卫生事业费. 2006年国家财政. 中医事业费支出数及比重, 2007