Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • 제30권5호
  • /
  • Pages.417-427
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
대한악안면성형재건외과학회 (Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지

다양한 양극산화막 처리방법이 임프란트 골유착에 미치는 영향

EFFECT OF VARIOUS INODIZING CHARACTERISTICS ON BONE INTEGRATION OF TITANIUM IMPLANT SURFACE DESIGN

  • 차수련 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이준 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 민승기 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과)
  • Cha, Soo-Ryun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Min, Seung-Ki (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2008.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anodizing surface to osseointegration of implant by using of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), quantitative and qualitative assessment of an anodically modified implant type with regard to osseous healing qualities. A total of 96 screw-shaped implants were prepared for this study. 72 implants were prepared by electrochemical oxidation with different ways. 24 (group 1 SP) were prepared at galvanostatic mode in 0.25M sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid. 24 (group 2GC) were prepared at galvanostatic mode in calcium glycerophosphate and calcium acetate and 24 (group 3 CMP (Calcium Metaphosphate) Coating were prepared at galvanostatic mode in 0.25M sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid followed by CMP coating. Rest of 24 (control group were as a control group of RBM surface. Bone tissue responses were evaluated by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) that were undertaken at 2, 4 and 6 weeks after implant placement in the mandible of mini-pig. Group 1 SP (anodized with sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid implants) demonstrated slightly stronger bone responses than control Group RBM. Group 2 GC (anodized surface with calcium glycerophosphate and calcium acetate implants) demonstrated no difference which were compared with control group. Group 3 GMP (anodized and CMP coated implants) demonstrated slightly stronger and faster bone responses than any other implants. But, all observation result of RF A showed no significant differences between experimental groups with various surface type. Histomorphometric evaluation demonstrated significantly higher bone-to-implant contact for group 2 GC. Significantly more bone formation was found inside threaded area for group 2 GC. It was concluded that group 2 GC (anodized surface with calcium glycerophosphate and calcium acetate implants) showed more effects on the bone tissue responses than RBM surface in initial period of implantation. In addition, CMP showed a tendency to promote bone tissue responses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B : 'Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems'. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8 : 622, 1993
  2. Branemark PI : Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosth Dentistry 50 : 399, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  3. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al : Osseointergated implants in the treatment of the edenfulous jaw.Experience from a 10 year period.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 16 : 7, 1977
  4. Adell R, Rockler B, Lekholm U et al : A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10 : 387, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  5. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P et al : The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1(1) : 11, 1986
  6. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S et al : Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implant. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25 : 889, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  7. Wennergerg A, Albrektsson T, Andresson B et al : A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res 6 : 24, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  8. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP et al : Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13 : 611, 1998
  9. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P et al : A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surface. Int J Periodontic Restorative Dent 19 : 117, 1999
  10. Parr GR, Gardner LK, Toth RW : Titanium; the mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental marterial aspects J. Prosthet. Dent. 54 : 410, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1
  11. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM et al : Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 25 : 1003, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00626-4
  12. Krupa D, Baszkiewicz J, Kozubowski JA et al : Corrosion resistance and bioactivity of titanium after surface treatment by three different methods: ion implantation, alkaline treatment and anodic oxidation. Anal Bioanal Chem 381 : 617, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2983-5
  13. Sul YT, Petronis S et al : Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 23 : 491, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4
  14. Sul YT, Petronis S, Roser K et al : Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. A histologic, enzyme histochemical and histomorphometric analysis. Biomaterials 23 : 1809, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00307-6
  15. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y et al : Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 252, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130304.x
  16. Cooper LF : A role of surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosth Dent 84 : 522, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.111966
  17. Mefferd RM, Langer B, Fritz ME : Dental implants : A review. J Periodontol 63 : 859, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  18. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M et al : Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 28 : 2, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  19. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G et al : Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types: A histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Imp Res 14 : 150, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x
  20. Joos U, Wiesmann HP, Szuwart T et al : Mineralization at the interface of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35 : 783, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.013
  21. Marinho VC, Celleti R, Brachetti G : Sandblasted and Acid-etched Dental Implants: A Histologic study in Rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 75, 2003
  22. Davies : The bone-Biomaterial interface, JE(ed). Toronto, University of Toronto Press 170, 1991
  23. Lausmaa J, Kasemo B : Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. Appl Surf Sci 44 : 133, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(90)90100-E
  24. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y et al : The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. medical engineering & Physics 23 : 329, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00050-9
  25. Grook K, Geesink R, Klein C et al : Plsama sprayed coatings of hyroxyapatite. J Biomedical Materials Reseach 21 : 1375, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820211203
  26. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G et al : Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Impl Res 14 : 150, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x
  27. Struder L, Meidinger N, Stotter D et al : High resolution X-ray spectroscopy close to room temperature. Microscopy & Microanalysis 4 : 622, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927698980606
  28. Zaffe D, Bertoldi C, Consolo U : Element release from titanium devices used in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Biomaterials 24 : 1093, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00424-6
  29. Wennerberg A, Albreksson T, Andersson B : An animal study of c. p. Titanium screws with different surface topographies. J Materials Science: materias in Medicine 6 : 302, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120275
  30. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B et al : A histomerphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res 5 : 24, 1995