Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived Risks and Benefits to Natural Dyeing Product -The Role of Product Knowledge-

천연염색 의류제품에 대한 지각된 위험과 혜택 -천연염색 제품지식에 따른 차이-

  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the influences of product knowledge(subject knowledge, purchase experience and information search) on perceived risks and benefits to natural dyeing product. Data were collected from a total of 213 Korean females ranging from 20 to 50 years old who know natural dyeing product through online survey. There were significant differences between(or among) groups with different levels of subject knowledge, purchase experience and information search in several types of perceived risks and benefits to natural dyeing product. Consumers with high knowledge of natural dyeing product perceived several types of risks lower than consumers with low knowledge but they perceived several types of benefits higher than consumers with low knowledge.

Keywords

References

  1. 김노호, 황선진. (2001). 남성복 구매형태에 따른 정보원 선택, 위험지각, 추구혜택의 차이에 관한 비교 연구. 복식, 51(7), 123−134
  2. 김연희, 배정훈, 박재옥, 이규혜. (2007). 대행 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서 위험지각과 정보탐색이 소비자 만족에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 31(5), 670−679 https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.5.670
  3. 김용숙. (2003). 의류임대 시 위험지각, 만족도 및 임대의도. 복식, 53(7), 29−36
  4. 김윤, 황선진. (2000). 자기감시, 위험지각과 광고소구유형이 화장품 구매행동에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 38(6), 59−70
  5. 김은영. (1998). 소비자 의류제품지식과 의복구매시 평가기준과의 관계. 한국의류학회지, 22(3), 353−364
  6. 김찬주. (1995). 의복상품특성에 따른 소비자 위험지각 및 위험감소행동에 관한 연구. 복식, 25, 41−62
  7. 남미우, 고애란. (2004). 도시 주부의 케이블TV 홈쇼핑을 통한 의복구매시 지각된 위험과 의복평가기준에 관한 연구. 복식, 54(6), 1−13
  8. 노은희. (2002). 미국의 천연염색 산업 및 디자인 현황에 대한 고찰. 한국공예논총, 5(1), 61−86
  9. 박은주, 홍금희. (1999). 소비자의 가격태도와 위험지각에 따른 의류할인점 선택행동에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 23(4), 529−540
  10. 심형석, 송경진. (2004). 웰빙비즈니스. 서울: 박영률출판사
  11. 유명님, 노의경. (2005). 델파이법을 이용한 천연염색에 관한 기초 연구 (제1보)-당면 과제 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 29(6), 859−867
  12. 임경복. (2001). 지각된 위험과 의복관여도가 정보탐색활동에 미치는 영향-대학생을 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 25(2), 206−216
  13. 임영자, 류은정. (2001). 생활한복의 구매의사에 대한 영향 요인 연구-생활한복 이미지, 추구혜택, 위험지각을 중심으로-. 대한가정학회지, 39(6), 123−133
  14. 장경혜. (2004). 개인의 가치관에 따른 천연염색 제품구매행동에 관한 연구. 한국의류산업학회지, 6(4), 461−466
  15. 장영용, 박은주. (2003). 미용서비스에 대한 위험지각과 소비자 만족의 관계 연구. 한국미용학회지, 9(1), 120−138
  16. 홍나영, 유혜경, 이주현, 석혜정, 신혜성, 김찬주. (2003). 천연염색 의류에 대한 소비자 반응 및 소비자 특성. 복식문화연구, 11(3), 404−415
  17. 홍희숙. (2001). 추구혜택과 패션이미지가 제주지역 패션문화상품 '갈옷' 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 39(2), 73−84
  18. 홍희숙. (2003). 제주 갈옷과 감물염색. 한국색채학회 초록집, 13−16
  19. 홍희숙. (2004). 제주지역 문화상품 '갈옷' 패션이미지와 '갈옷' 구매행동-제주지역 여성 소비자를 대상으로-. 제주도연구, 26, 223−254
  20. 홍희숙, 고애란. (1996). 상황과 소비자 특성의 추구혜택과 선호 브랜드 유형에 대한 영향. 한국의류학회지, 20(5), 738−752
  21. 황진숙, 정정현. (2005). 인터넷 쇼핑 및 TV 홈쇼핑 위험지각에 따른 의복쇼핑성향, 구매의도, 구매행동. 한국의류학회지, 29(5), 637−648
  22. Aker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press
  23. Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411−454 https://doi.org/10.1086/209080
  24. Alhakami, A. S. & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis. 14(6), 1085−1096 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
  25. Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Proceeding of the Conference of the American Marketing Association, USA, 389−398
  26. Bettman, J. R. & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of choice process on consumer decision process: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 243−248
  27. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1−16 https://doi.org/10.1086/209031
  28. Brucks, M. (1986). A typology of consumer knowledge content. In R. J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 58-63). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research
  29. Cole, G. A., Gaeth, G., & Sing, S. N. (1986). Measuring prior knowledge. In R. J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 64-66). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research
  30. Cowley, E. & Mitchell, A. A. (2003). The moderating effect of product knowledge on the learning and organization of product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 443−454 https://doi.org/10.1086/378620
  31. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1998). Understanding public attitudes to technology. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 221−235 https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377141
  32. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization process. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60−78 https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  33. Haley, R. I. (1968), Benefit segmentation: A decision-oriented research tool. Journal of Marketing, 32(3), 30−35 https://doi.org/10.2307/1249759
  34. Jacoby, J. & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Proceeclings of the Association for Consumer Research, USA, 382−393
  35. Johnson, E. J. & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 542−550 https://doi.org/10.1086/208990
  36. Kim, M. & Lennon, S. J. (2000). Television shopping for apparel in the United States: Effects of perceived amount of information on perceived risks and purchase intentions, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 28(3), 301−330 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X00283002
  37. Park, C. W. & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristic. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223−230 https://doi.org/10.1086/208859
  38. Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71−82 https://doi.org/10.1086/209383
  39. Peter, J. P. & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior: Marketing strategy perspectives. IL: Irwin Inc
  40. Peter, J. P. & Ryan, M. J. (1976). An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. Journal of Marketing, 40(2), 184−188
  41. Punj, G. N. & Staelin, R.(1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 366−380 https://doi.org/10.1086/208931
  42. Rao, A. & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253−264 https://doi.org/10.1086/209162
  43. Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61 https://doi.org/10.2307/1250565
  44. Selnes, F. & Gronhaug, K. (1986). Subjective and objective measure of product knowledge contrasted. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 67-71
  45. Shim, S. Y. & Bickle, M. C. (1994). Benefit segments of female apparel market: Psychographics, shopping orientations, and demographics. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 12(2), 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9401200201
  46. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C.(2000). Salient value similarity, social trust and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353-362 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034
  47. Siegrist, M. & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713-719 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205064
  48. Siegrist, M. (1999). A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2093-2106 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02297.x
  49. Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195-203 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
  50. Zajonic, R. B. & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 123-131 https://doi.org/10.1086/208905

Cited by

  1. Study on Risk Reduction Behavior According to Participation Motivation of Mountain Climbing Activity and Level of Risk Perception vol.15, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.4.523
  2. Purchase intention on naturally dyed clothing depending on fabric benefit sought and attitudes - A cross-cultural study between Korea and the United States - vol.22, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.2.183
  3. A study on the Purchase Appraisal Standard and Post-purchase Satisfaction of Natural Dyeing Products vol.14, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.1.064
  4. The Influence of Perceived Risk of Up-cycling Fashion Product on Trust, Purchase Intention and Recommendation Intention vol.17, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.2.216
  5. The effect of congruency of parent brand image with self-image, perceived risk, and product knowledge on the attitude towards extended product in fashion brand extension - Focusing on moderating effects - vol.23, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.1.063
  6. Perceived Value Dimensions of Up-cycling Fashion Goods and the Relationship with Attitude and Purchase Intention - The Moderating Effect of Fashion Innovativeness - vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.257
  7. The effect of perceived value and risk on purchasing intention of up-cycling fashion product vol.26, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2018.26.6.899