References
- Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63:146-8, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
- Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 55:446-7, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90173-3
- Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-9, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
- Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 9:2-5, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8
- Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 13:146-50, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80115-7
- Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res. 77:1435-45, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060801
- He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effect of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater 23:533-38, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.012
- Uno S, Tanka T, Inoue S. The influence of configuration factors on cavity adaptation in compomer restoration. Dent Mater 18:19-31, 1999 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.18.19
- Shirai K, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and agind on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110-124, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
- Wattanawongpitak N, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of bonding system and composite type on adaptation of different C-factor restorations. Dent Mater 25:45-50, 2006 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.45
- Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-40, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
- Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13:324-8, 2000
- Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'Nobottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives: a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-80, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
- Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 78:898-905, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780041001
- Mallmann A, Soares FZM, Placido E, Ferrari M, Cardoso PEC. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching and single-bottle adhesive systems in different cavity configurations. J Adhes Dent 5:121-7, 2003
- 김보경. 와동의 형태가 상아질과 복합레진 사이의 결합력에 미 치는 영향. 석사 학위 논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 서울, 2007
- Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 4:379-83, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80053-8
- Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 10:241-6, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-X
- Inoue T, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Anisotropy of tensile strengths of bovine dentin regarding dentinal tubule orientation and location. Dent Mater 21:32-43, 2002 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.32
- Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness and Ca-concentration vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229-33, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90090-Y
- Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 27:265- 74, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00060-8
- Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 5:33-8, 1992
- Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins, Dent Mater 6:45-50, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90044-F
- Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29:462-9, 2004
- Ruttermann S, Kruger S, Raab WH, Janda R. Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials - a comparative study. J Dent 35:806-13, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.014
- Kishikawa R, Koiwa A, Chikawa H, Cho E, Inai N, Tagami J. Effect of cavity form on adhesion to cavity floor. Am J Dent 18:311-4, 2005
Cited by
- Difference in bond strength according to filling techniques and cavity walls in box-type occlusal composite resin restoration vol.34, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.4.350
- Effect of Chlorhexidine Application Methods on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin in Class I Cavities vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2341/09-360-L
- Effect of Er:YAG lasing on the dentin bonding strength of two-step adhesives vol.36, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.409
- Effect of different chlorhexidine application times on microtensile bond strength to dentin in Class I cavities vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.9