DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COMPARISON OF THE RESIDUAL STRESS OF THE NANOFILLED COMPOSITES

Nanofilled 복합레진의 잔류응력 비교

  • Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Yongdong Severance Hospital)
  • 박정원 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실 영동세브란스 치과병원 보존과)
  • Published : 2008.09.30

Abstract

"Residual stress" can be developed during polymerization of the dental composite and it can be remained after this process was completed. The total amount of the force which applied to the composite restoration can be calculated by the sum of external and internal force. For the complete understanding of the restoration failure behavior. these two factors should be considered. In this experiment. I compared the residual stress of the recently developed nanofilled dental composite by ring slitting methods. The composites used in this study can be categorized in two groups. one is microhybrid type-Z250, as control group, and nanofilled type-Grandio, Filtek Supreme. Ceram-X, as experimental ones. Composite ring was made and marked two reference points on the surface. Then measure the change of the distance between these two points before and after ring slitting. From the distance change, average circumferential residual stress $({\sigma}{\theta})$ was calculated. In 10 minutes and 1 hour measurement groups, Filtek Supreme showed higher residual stress than Z250 and Ceram-X. In 24 hour group, Filtek showed higher stress than the other groups. Following the result of this experiment, nanofilled composite showed similar or higher residual stress than Z250, and when comparing the Z250 and Filtek Supreme, which have quite similar matrix components. Filtek Supreme groups showed higher residual stress.

중합수축이 일어난 후 복합 레진 내에는 중합수축에서 기원한 응력이 내부에 남아있을 수 있는데 이를 "잔류응력"이라 한다. 수복물에 가해지는 총힘은 외부에서 가해지는 힘과 내부에 남아있는 응력의 합으로 결정이 되며 수복물의 실패를 이해하기 위해서 이 두 가지 요소가 반드시 고려되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 ring slitting방법을 이용하여 최근 임상에 소개된 나노충진형 복합레진간의 잔류응력을 비교하였다. 실험에 사용한 복합레진은 대조군으로 microhybrid-type인 Z250과 nanofiller를 함유한 Grandio, Filtek Supreme, Ceram-X를 이용하여 복합레진 링을 제작하고 2개의 기준점을 표시한 후 이 사이의 거리를 링 절단 전과 후에 각각 측정하여 거리 변화를 측정하였다. 거리의 변화로부터 average circumferential residual stress $({\sigma}{\theta})$를 계산하였다. 10분과 1시간 경과 후 측정한 군에서는 Filtek Supreme이 Z250이나 Ceram-X보다 높은 잔류응력을 보여 주었고, 24시간 경과한 군에서는 Filtek Supreme이 나머지 군보다 높은 잔류응력을 보여주었다. 본 실험 결과에 의하면 nanofiller를 함유한 복합레진의 잔류응력은 대조군으로 사용한 Z250보다 높거나 같은 값을 나타냈으며 거의 비슷한 기질조성을 가진 Z250과 Filtek Supreme을 비교했을 때 Filtek supreme이 모든 측정시간대에서 높은 잔류응력을 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Distribution of transient properties during polymerization of a lightinitiated restorative composite. Dent Mater 20:543- 553, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.006
  2. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 20:554-564, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.007
  3. Toschi F, Melandri C, Pinasco P, Roncari E, Guicciardi S, de Portu G. Influence of residual stresses on the wear behavior of alumina/alumina-zirconia laminated composites. J Am Ceram Soc 86:1547-1553, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03512.x
  4. Whittle AJ, Burford RP, Hoffman MJ. Influence of Residual Stress on the Relationship Between Pipe Pressure and C-Ring Tests. Polym Eng Sci 40:2311- 2316, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11363
  5. Choi KK, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ, Ferracane JL. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29:462-469, 2004
  6. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396- 1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  7. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 17:103-111, 1986
  8. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent 16:239-243, 2003
  9. Alkhiary YM, Morgano SM, Giordano RA. Effect of acid hydrolysis and mechanical polishing on surface residual stresses of low-fusing dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 90:133-142, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00277-4
  10. Taskonak B, Mecholsky Jr JJ, Anusavice KJ. Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics. Biomaterials 26:3235-3241, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.025
  11. Kemp-Scholte CK, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  12. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-444, 1991
  13. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfiller particles. Dent Mater 14:256-260, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00036-0
  14. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 3:177-183, 2001
  15. Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 134:721-728, 2003 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0258
  16. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 21:36-42, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.004
  17. Witzer MF, Calheiros FC, Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. J Dent 33:773-779, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.005
  18. Lu J. Introduction, In: Handbook of measurement of residual stress. Lu J editor. Lilburn, GA: The Fairmont press Inc. pp. 1-4, 1996
  19. Seif MA, Kishawy HA, Hassan MA. Residual stresses in plastic pipes by laser speckle technique. J Test Eval 25:465-470, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE11355J
  20. Seif MA, Short SR. Determination of residual stresses in thin-walled composite cylinders. Exp Techniques 26:43-46, 2002
  21. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method. Dent Mater 21:882-889, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.006
  22. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Residual stress in composites with the thin-ring-slitting approach. J Dent Res 85:945-949, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501015
  23. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87:642-649, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.125179

Cited by

  1. Microleakage of the experimental composite resin with three component photoinitiator systems vol.34, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.4.333