Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Kinematics Analysis of Abscission Handicap Wheelchair Table Tennis

절단장애 휠체어 탁구 스트로크의 운동학적 분석

  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to kinematically analyze forehand & backhand strokes of abscission handicap wheelchair table tennis athletes. The participant of this study were picked out of national athletes who have abscission handicap. Forehand stroke movement was expected to show a throw like motion. However, external rotation and internal rotation of the right arm created a backswing and an impact. Backhand stroke was expected to show a push like motion, and as expected, proximal part of the body didn't participate in the stroke motion, but the distal part, the right arm, rotated internally to backswing and external rotated to impact to form a push like motion. Forehand swing was expected to show throw like motion according to the Link Segmental System principle. However, abscission handicap athlete didn't show clear linking structure connecting proximal and distal parts. Successful strokes were dependant only on the angle of arm rotation.

본 연구는 국가대표 절단장애 휠체어 탁구선수를 대상으로 절단장애 휠체어 탁구의 일반적 스트로크 운동형태를 알아보기 위해 실행되었다. 연구대상은 절단장애 1명을 선발하여 10회에 걸쳐 스트로크 하는 영상을 수집하였다. 그 중 대상자와 코치가 지정하는 3개의 영상을 연구대상으로 정하였다. 스트로크 하는 팔의 팔꿈치의 굴곡신전, 어깨의 굴곡신전, 어깨의 회전, 그리고 허리의 회전을 분석하였다. 포핸드 스트로크는 일반적으로 치는 듯한 동작을 나타낼 것으로 예상했으나 오른팔의 외측회전으로 만들어진 백스윙과 내측회전으로 만들어지는 회전에 의지하여 스트로크하고 있었다. 백핸드 스트로크는 예상대로 기시부인 몸통이 스트로크에 관여하지 않고 말초부인 오른팔이 내측회전 백스윙을 이루고 외측회전으로 임팩트를 이루는 미는 듯한 동작을 나타내고 있었다. 포핸드 스트로크 일반적인 스윙동작을 나타내는 다중분절시스템의 원리에 의해 치는 듯한 동작을 보일 것으로 예상했지만 절단장애인인 대상자는 기시부와 말초부로 이어지는 연결구조가 명확하게 나타나지 않았다. 다만 어깨의 회전폭이 스트로크 성공여부를 결정지었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Feltner, M. E., & Dapena, J. (1989). Three-demensional interactions in a two-segment kinetic chain. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 5(4), 420-450.
  2. Champman, A. E., Lonergan, R.,, and Caldwell, G. E. (1984). Kinetic sources of lower-limb angular displacement in the recovery phase of sprinting. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 16, 382 - 388.
  3. Finley, M.A., & Rodger, M. M. (2004) Prevalence and identification of shoulder pathology in athletic and nonathletic wheelchair users with shoulder pain : A pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development,. 41(3B). 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2003.02.0022
  4. Hoy, M. G., and Zernicke, R. F. (1986). The role of inter-segmental dynamics during rapid limb oscillations. J. Biomechanics 19, 867 - 877. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(86)90137-5
  5. Huang, C. ; Li, Q. ; Wei, X.-y.(2004). Kinematic Parameters of Attacking Loop with Backhand Reverse Side of the Table Tennis Penholder Racket. Sports science research ,v.25 no.5, pp.38-41.
  6. Kondric, M. ; Furjan-Mandic, G. ; Medved, V.(2004). Myoelectric and neuromuscular features of table tennis forehand stroke performance executed with balls of different sizes. World congress of science and racket sports, pp.121-126.
  7. Lees & Adrian(2003). Science and the major racket sports: a review. Journal of sports sciences,v.21 no.9, pp.707-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140275
  8. Mena, D., Mansour, J. M. and Simon, S. R. (1981). Analysis and synthesis of human swing leg motion during gait and its clinical applications. J. Biomechanics, 14, 823 - 832. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90010-5
  9. Putnam, C. A. (1980). Segment interaction in selected two-segment motions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
  10. Putnam, C. A. (1983). Interaction between segments during a kicking motion. Biomechanics VIII-B, (Edited by Matsui, H. and Kobayashi, K.), Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., Champaign, IL. 688 - 694.
  11. Winter, D. A., and Robertson, D. G. E. (1978). Joint torque and energy patterns in normal gait. Biological Cybernetics, 29, 137 - 142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337349