Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Reconstructing Archival Appraisal Regime of Foreign Countries in Electronic Record Environments : Focusing on Archival Appraisal Strategies in a National Point of Views

전자기록 환경에서의 세계 각국 평가체제 개편에 관한 연구 - 국가적 차원의 영구보존기록 평가전략을 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Myoung-Hun (Department of Archives and Information, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 김명훈 (한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보기록관리학과)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This article intends to provide a direction for reconstructing the national regime of archival appraisal in electronic record environments. Functional appraisal, which inevitably carries out for appraising electronic records, has defects in aspect of selecting archives important in a national point of views. To do so, this article discusses defects of functional appraisal, and then suggests the necessity of archival appraisal strategies that complements functional appraisal. To investigate this archival appraisal strategies, it analyzes Australia's Whole-of-Government Functional Analysis, United Kingdom's Acquisition Policy and Appraisal Policy, Germany's Cooperative Cross-Archives Appraisal and Canada's Macro Appraisal. Ultimately, this analysis is able to establish a base of the regime of archival appraisal which will harmonize primary value at current stage with secondary value at non-current stage in a national point of views.

본고는 전자기록 환경에서의 국가 평가체계 정비 방향을 모색하기 위한 시론적 연구로서의 의미를 지닌다. 전자기록 환경에서의 필연적인 평가방식이라 할 수 있는 기능평가는 국가적 차원의 영구보존 기록 선별에는 일정 한계를 지닌다. 이에 본고에서는 우선 기능평가가 지닌 한계를 논의한 다음, 이를 보완하기 위한 방안으로 영구보존 대상 평가전략의 필요성을 제기하였다. 그리고 이에 대한 구체적인 사례를 고찰하기 위해, 호주의 범정부 기능분석, 영구의 평가정책 및 수집정책, 독일의 다기관협력 평가전략, 캐나다의 거시평가 전략을 분석하였다. 결국 이러한 분석은 현용 가치와 사회적 가치가 조화된 국가 평가체계의 토대를 제공해주게 된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원. 2006. LG CNS 컨소시엄. 기록관리시스템 혁신 ISP사업 최종결과보고서: 2. 추진과제별 개선모델 설계-2.2 기록관리 항목 관리방안. 국가기록원.
  2. 국가기록원. 2006a. 업무 및 기록분류체계 통합에 의한 기관 단위과제별 보존기간표 및 기록물보존업무처리기준표 작성 방안. 기록물 보존업무 처리기준표 작성: 2006.6. 27 중앙행정기관 자료. 국가기록원.
  3. 국가기록원. 2006b. 업무 및 기록분류체계 통합에 의한 기관별 업무 및 기록분류표 작성 방안. 국가기록원 평가자문회의 자료. 국가기록원.
  4. 국가기록원. 2007. 단위과제 보존기간 책정. 조정 지침. 국가기록원.
  5. 김명훈, 현종철. 2007. 매뉴스크립트 평가체계 구축에 관한 사례연구. 한국기록학회 발표문.
  6. 김명훈. 2005a. 전자기록 환경에서의 평가에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 11.
  7. 김명훈. 2005b. 전자기록물의 평가에 관한 기반 연구. 기록보존, 18: 135-137.
  8. 김명훈. 2006. ISO 15489를 기반으로 한 전자기록 평가모형 설계. 미발표논문.
  9. 김익한. 1998. 기록물 관리체제론 및 평가분류의 새로운 흐름. 기록보존, 11.
  10. 김현진. 2006. 독일 기록관리 담론에서의 평가론. 기록학연구, 14.
  11. 나영선. 2007. 캐나다 거시평가 제도의 이론적 배경과 운영현황에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 정보기록관리학과.
  12. 유혜림. 2007. 전자기록 환경의 도래와 영국 평가.수집제도 개편에 관한 연구. 석사학위 논문, 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 정보기록관리학과
  13. Australian Government & NAA. 2005. Provisional Macro-appraisal Rank ings of the Functions of the Aus tralian Government, 1975-2004. NAA. [cited 2005.6.16]. .
  14. Bailey, Catherine. 1997. “From the Top Down: The Practice of Macro-Appraisal.” Archivaria, 43.
  15. Bantin, Philip C. 1999. “Strategies for Managing Electronic Records: A New Archival Paradigm? An Affirmation of Our Archival Traditions?” Archival Issues. [cited 2008.5.11]. .
  16. Beaven, Brian P. N. 1999. “Macro-Ap praisal : From Theory to Practice.” Archivaria, .48.
  17. Booms, Hans. 1987. “Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage : Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.” Archivaria, 24.
  18. Booms, Hans. 1991-1992. “Uberlieferungs bildung: Keeping Archives as a Social and Political Activity.” Archivaria, 33.
  19. Brown, Richard. 2001. “Preserving the Archival and Historical Memory of Government.” [cited 2008.4.16]..
  20. Cook, Terry. 2001a. “Appraisal Methodology: Macro - Appraisal and Functional Analysis - Part A: Concepts and Theory.” [cited 2005.12.7]. .
  21. Cook, Terry. 2001b. “Appraisal Methodology: Macro - Appraisal and Functional Analysis - Part B: Guidelines for Performing an Archival Appraisal on Government Records.” [cited 2005.12.7]. .
  22. Cook, Terry. 2004. “Macro-appraisal and Functional Analysis: Documenting Governance rather than Government.” Journal of Society of Archivists, 25(1).
  23. Cook, Terry. 2005. “Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice : Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950-2000.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  24. Craig, Barbara. 2004. Archival Appraisal: Theory and Practice. Munchen: K.G. Saur.
  25. Cunningham, Adrian & Oswald, Robyn. 2005. “Some Functions are More Equal than Others: The Development of a Macroappraisal Strategy for the National Archives of Australia.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  26. Cunningham, Adrian. 2005. “Some Functions Are More Equal than Others: The National Archives’ Macro- Appraisal Project.” [cited 2007.2.13]. .
  27. Davies, Howard. 2006. “Selection Policies for All: The Advent of Generic Operational Selection Policies for Use across Government.” Record Keeping 8. [cited 2007.8.22]. .
  28. Eastwood, Terry. 1982. “Archives and Social History.” Archivaria, 14.
  29. Fortier, Normand. 2005. “Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability : Developing a Knowledge Infras tructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  30. Hurley, Chris. 2004. “What, If Anything, Is Records Management?.” RMAA Conference Paper. [cited 2007.4.15]. .
  31. Kelly, Russell. 2001. “The National Archives of Australia’s New App roach to Appraisal.” Archives and Manuscripts, 29(1).
  32. Kolsrud, Ole. 1992. “The Evolution of Basic Appraisal Principles : Some Comp arative Observations.” American Archivists, 55(1).
  33. Kretzschmar, Robert. 2005. “Archival Appraisal in Germany : A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  34. Laberge, Danielle. 1987. “Information, Knowledge, and Rights: The Preservation of Archives as a Political and Social Issue.” Archivaria, 25.
  35. LAC. 2000. “Government-Wide Plan for Disposition of Records, Version 5: 1999.” .
  36. LAC. 2004a. “Checklist of Sources to Support Research for the GRAD Program.”(미간행자료). LAC.
  37. LAC. 2004b. “Guide to Research in Support of Developing a Memeorandum of Understanding(MOU) for the Disposition of Government Records.”(미간행자료). LAC.
  38. LAC. 2005. “Multi-Institutional Disposition Authorities.” [cited 2006.11.30]. .
  39. Loewen, Canadace. 2005a. “The Evolution, Application, and Future of Macro appraisal.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  40. Loewen, Candace. 2005b. “Accounting for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada: From Disposition to Acquisition and Accessibility.” Archival Science, 5(2-4).
  41. Man, Elizabeth. 2005. “A Functional Approach to Appraisal and Retention Scheduling.” Records Management Journal, 15(1).
  42. McKemmish, Sue. 1998. “The Smoking Gun: Recordkeeping and Account ability.” [cited 2007.5.18]. .
  43. Menne-Haritz, Angelika. 1994a. “Appraisal or Documentation: Can We Appraise Archives by Selecting Content?” American Archivist, 57(2).
  44. Menne-Haritz, Angelika. 1994b. “Appraisal or Selection-Can a Content Oriented Appraisal be Harmonized with the Principle of Provenance?” The Principle of Provenance: First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 sept 1993. Stoc kholm: Swedish National Archives.
  45. Menne-Haritz, Angelika. 1999. “Appraisal and Disposal of Electronic Records and the Principle of Provenance: Appraisal for Access-Not for Oblivion.” Principles of Appraisal and Their Application in Electronic Environment : European Models and Concepts. [cited 2007.8.14]. .
  46. Mercer, Helen & TNA Inspection and Client Manager Unit. 2006a. How to Compile an Appraisal Report(version 2). TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  47. Mercer, Helen & TNA Inspection and Client Manager Unit. 2006b. Preparation for Undertaking Review of Paper Records(version 2). TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  48. Mercer, Helen. 2004. Appraisal Policy (version 1). TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  49. Millar, Laura. 2004. “Evidence, Memory, and Knowledge : The Relationship between Memory and Archives.” 15th International Congress on Archives. [cited 2006.1.31]. .
  50. Mills, Tom. 2005. “Strategic Approaches to Appraisal.” Manual on Appraisal (Draft): A Practical Guide for the Daily Problems of Appraising and Selecting Documents. ICA/CAP.
  51. NAA. 2003a. Appraisal. NAA. .
  52. NAA. 2003b. Macro-Appraisal(Revisions). NAA. [cited 2005.6.16]. .
  53. NAA. 2003c. Why Records are Kept: Directions in Appraisal(Revisions). NAA. [cited 2005.6.16]. .
  54. NAA. 2006a. “Macro-appraisal Project: Results of Consultation.”[cited 2005.6.16]. .
  55. NAA. 2006b. Whole-of-Government Functional Analysis : The Relative Significance of Functions of the Australian Government, 1975-2005. NAA.
  56. Nesmith, Tom. 1982. “Archives from the Bottom Up: Social History and Archival Scholarship.” Archivaria, 14.
  57. Piggott, Michael. 2001. “Appraisal: The State of the Art.” ASA South Australia Branch Workshop Paper. [cited 2005.6.18]. .
  58. Reed, Barbara. 2003. “Diverse Influence: An Exploration of Australian Appraisal Practice-Part I.” Archives and Manuscripts, 31(1).
  59. Reed, Barbara. 2005. “Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the Potential of Pluralised Recordkeeping.” Archiv es and Manuscripts, 33(1).
  60. Roberts, David. 1998. “The New Australian Records Management Standard.” State Records New South Wales. [cited 2007.8.16]. .
  61. Schwirtlich, Anne-Marie. 2002. “The Functional Approach to Appraisal: The Experience of the National Archives of Australia.” Comma, 2002 (1-2): 57-58.
  62. Simpson, Duncan & Graham, Susan. 2002. “Appraisal and Selection of Records: A New Approach.” Comma. 2002 (1-2).
  63. Stephens, David O. & Roberts, David. 1996. “From Australia : The World’s First National Standard for Records Management.” Records Management Quarterly, 30(4).
  64. TNA, Appraisal Project Board. 2004. The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper: The ‘Grigg System’ and beyond. TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  65. TNA. 1999. “Acquisition Policy.” [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  66. TNA. 2002. Evaluating Information Assets: Appraising the Inventory of Electronic Records. TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  67. TNA. 2007. Acquisition and Disposition strategy. TNA. [cited 2007.10.18]. .
  68. Twigge, Stephen. 2005. “The Appraisal of Electronic Records.” Manual on Appraisal( Draft) : A Practical Guide for the Daily Problems of Appraising and Selecting Documents. ICA/CAP.