Histomorphometric analysis of an immediate non-functional loaded implant in dogs

  • Ha, Jeong-Wan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Hyun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Moon, Seong-Yong (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Chul (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2008.02.29

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of immediate non-functional loading by analyzing histomorphology around the implant tissues in dogs. Five eight- to nine-month-old full-grown dogs weighing around 12 kg were used in the study. Group I (control group) comprised those in which delayed loading was applied to the right side of the mandible, and Group II (experimental group) consisted of dogs in which immediate loading was performed on the left side of the mandible. Resorbable blast media (RBM)-treated double-threaded US III implants measuring 3.5 mm in diameter and 11 mm long were used in the study. Each animal received four implants in each group, for a total of 40 implants. Cemented type abutments were used after implantation. An 8-week period was allowed for bone healing and an abutment was placed after exposing the periosteum for loading. An implant sample was obtained from bone blocks taken when the dogs were killed at 16 weeks after loading. A Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to evaluate statistical significance. Student's t-test was used for the histological evaluation. The bone formation ratio in Groups 1 and 2 was 88.23 and 86.41%, respectively. No significant difference in new bone formation was observed in the two groups. As no significant difference was seen in new bone formation between the delayed and immediate loading groups, early loading might be possible after implant placement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim SG: Immediate post-extraction implant and immediate loading implant. Seoul, Daehan Publishing Co, 2005, p 139
  2. Corso M, Sirota C, Fiorellini J, Rasool F, Szmukler-Moncler S, Weber HP: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded free-standing dental implants with various coatings in beagle dogs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:428-435 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70029-6
  3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  4. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L: State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:474-481 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
  5. Romanos GE, Testori T, Degidi M, Piattelli A: Histologic and histomorphometric findings from retrieved, immediately occlusally loaded implants in humans. J Periodontol 2005;76:1823-1832 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1823
  6. Lum LB, Beirne OR, Curtis DA: Histologic evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated versus uncoated titanium blade implants in delayed and immediately loaded applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:456-462
  7. Sagara M, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H: The effects of early occlusal loading on one-stage titanium alloy implants in beagle dogs: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:281-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90107-Y
  8. Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S, Classi A: Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: Ten consecutive case reports with 1-to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:319-324
  9. Brunski JB: Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update 1993;4:77-81
  10. Kawahara H, Kawahara D, Hayakawa M, Tamai Y, Kuremoto T, Matsuda S: Osseointegration under immediate loading: biomechanical stress-strain and bone formationresorption. Implant Dent 2003;12:61-68 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000034394.75768.E3
  11. Frost HM: The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:283-293
  12. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H: Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:599-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90289-Z
  13. Roberts WE, Garetto LP, DeCastro RA: Remodeling of devitalized bone threathens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with threaded or smooth surface: Indications for provisional loading and axially directed occlusion. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1989;68:19-24
  14. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH: Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:831-836
  15. Zubery Y, Bichacho N, Moses O, Tal H: Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 1999;19:343-353
  16. Froum S, Emtiaz S, Bloom MJ, Scolnick J, Tarnow DP: The use of transitional implants for immediate fixed temporary prostheses in cases of implant restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:737-746
  17. Ledermann PD, Schenk Rk, Buser D: Long-lasting osseointegration of immediately loaded, bar-connected TPS screws after 12 years of function: a histologic case report of a 95-year-old patient. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:552-563