상악동저 거상술 후 Osstem Implant (US II / SS II)의 다기관 후향적 임상연구

A RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER CLINICAL STUDY OF INSTALLED US II / SS II IMPLANTS AFTER MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION

  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소, 2단계 BK 21) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소, 2단계 BK 21) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김영균 (분당서울대학교병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 조용석 (건강한세상 앞선치과병원) ;
  • 최갑림 (대동병원) ;
  • 오영학 (올치과의원) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소, 2단계 BK 21)
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, 2nd Stage of Brain Korea 21) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, 2nd Stage of Brain Korea 21) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Chosun University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Seok (Apsun Dental Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Gab-Lim (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daedong Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Young-Hak (All Dental Private Office) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, 2nd Stage of Brain Korea 21)
  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the $Osstem^{(R)}$ implants (US II/SS II implants) through the retrospective study for the clinical success rate during the installation of the $Osstem^{(R)}$ implants (US II/SS II implants) by using of the procedures of maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: The current study was researched in the 6 medical institutions: Chonnam National University, Chosun University, Pusan DaeDong Hospital, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, Ap-Seon Clinic, and All Clinic. Based on the total number of 116 patients whose treatment was the installation of the US II/SS II implants with the procedures of the maxillary sinus floor elevation, they were conferred on the dental records of the patients under the joint consultation of the 6 medical institutions. On the dental recording charts, there were included in as the following; the name of the institutions, gender, age, with or without smoking or drinking, with or without the generalized diseases, the height of the alveolar bone on the operational sites, elapsed edentulous state period, the state of the opposed or adjacent teeth, the methods of the maxillary sinus floor elevation, secondary time period for surgery, the lengths, types, and diameters of implants, with or without bone transplantation or the types of bone, postoperative current bone height, current adjacent soft tissue state of the implants, with or without the success of the installations of the implants. We have done our survey with the clinical and radiolographical examinations and dental questionaries. The success and survival rate of the implants was evaluated. Results 1. Total number of the patients with the installation of the US II implants were 62. The 252 numbers of US II implants were installed on the 89 maxillary sinuses. The patient's mean age was 54.1 years old and there were 36 men and 27 women. 2. Total number of patients with the installation of SS II implant were 57. The 165 numbers of SS II implants were planted on the 80 maxillary sinuses. Their mean age was 48.7 years old and there were 37 men and 20 women. 3. The follow-up period was 30.7 months(21-49 mon) on average. The vertical bone loss of installed implants after the procedures of the maxillary sinus elevation was 1.1 mm on average in SS II and 1.3 mm on average in US II. There existed no statistical significance on each group. The mean enlarged bone height after the maxillary sinus floor elevation was 8.2 mm. 4. For the procedures of the maxillary sinus elevation, the Lateral approach technique occupied 87.1%, which was the most used one. In addition, the most frequently used transplanted bone was autogenous bone only which was 72.7% during the maxillary sinus floor elevation. 5. The complication of maxillary sinus floor elevation were perforation of sinus membrane, disesthesia on doner site, exposure of cover screw and exposure of maxillar bone. 6. The survival rate of US II and SS II after maxillary sinus floor elevation was 99.2% and 95.8%, respectively. And the success rate of US II and SS II after maxillary sinus floor elevation was 97.6% and 89.7%, respectively. Conclusion : On the evaluation of the analysis of our study, both US II and SS II implants showed the excellent clinical results by use of the procedures of maxillary sinus floor elevation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FHM: Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites : A prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endocrinol 2006;101:705-710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.022
  2. Degidi M, Piattelli A: Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:99-107
  3. Simsek B, Simsek S: Evaluation of success rates of immediate and delayed implants after tooth extraction. Chinese Med J 2003;116:1216-1219
  4. 대한구강악안면임플란트학회: 구강악안면임플란트학, Vol II Advanced concepts and techniques, 제1판. 서울: 나래출판사:2006;326
  5. Alberktsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  6. Branemark P, Adell R: An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillaty sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:497-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90008-9
  7. Hall HD, Mckenna SJ: Bone graft of maxillary sinus floor for Branemark Implant. Oral and Maxillfac Surg Clin of North America 1991;3:869-874
  8. Park LY, Lee JH, Kim OH: A clinical study of maxillary sinus graft for implant placement. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Rec Surg 1998;20:166-172
  9. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR: Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants with augmented maxillary sinus : A 5 year clinical investigation. Int J Oral and Maxillofac implants 1996;11:466-475
  10. Tatum H: Lectures presented at the Alabama implant study group. October 1977;3-4
  11. Boyne PJ, James RA: Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:630-635 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90096-6
  12. Misch CE: Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants : Organised alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantology 1987;4:49-58
  13. Misch CE: Contemporary implant dentistry. mosby Co.1993:241
  14. Isaksson S, Alberius P: Maxillary alveolar ridge aubmentation with onlay bone-grafts and immediate endosseous implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20:2-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80187-8
  15. Isaksson S, Ekfeldet A, Alberius P, Blomqvist JE: Early results from reconstruction of severely atrophic (class IV) maxillae by immediate endosseous implants in conjunction with bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:144-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80239-5
  16. Isaksson S: Evaluation of three bone grafting techniques for severely resorbed maxillae in conjunction with immediate endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1994;9:679-688
  17. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Homes RE: Maxillary sinus aubmentation : Histomorphometric analysis of graft mlaterials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:857-862 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X
  18. Jensen OT, Greer R: Immediate placement of osseointegrating implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex : Second-stage surgical and histologic findings, in Laney WR, Tolman DE(eds) : Tissue integration in Oral Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago, IL, Quintessence. 1992:321-333
  19. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL, Misch C, Rosenlicht JL, Tatum OH, Wagner JR: Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants : Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:151-186
  20. Norbert Velich, Zsolt Nemeth, Christian Toth, Gyorgy Szabo: Long-term results with different bone substitutes uses for sinus floor elevation. The journal of craniofacial surgery 2004;15:38-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013