임플란트 표면에 따른 인공치면세균막 형성에 관한 연구

THE STUDY OF THE DENTAL PLAQUE FORMATION ON DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES

  • 김진우 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 한세진 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김경욱 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Se-Jin (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Wook (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the artificial dental plaque by Streptococcus mutans on 4 different implant surfaces. In this study, the specimens were divided into 4 groups according to implant surface treatment. Uncoated implant group(n=5) which has an uncoated, smooth surfaced implant(Osstem, Korea), SLA implant group(n=5) which has an sandblasted large grit and acid-etched surface implant(Bicon, USA). Oxidized implant group(n=5) which has an oxidized surfaced implant (Osstem, Korea), and RBM implant group(n=5) which has resorbable blasting media(RBM) surfaced implant(Osstem, Korea). Acquired pellicle by human saliva and dental plaque by Streptococcus mutans were made on each implant surface. To analyze the plaque condition on implants surfaces, cell count and optical density were taken as a microbiologic method, and SEM(Scanning Electronic Microscope) findings was also taken for evaluation of surface condition. The following results were obtained. 1. Cell counting results of artificial dental plaque were Uncoated group($658.0{\pm}102.0$), RBM group($878.0{\pm}170.0$), SLA group ($946.0{\pm}42.0$), Oxidized group($992.0{\pm}40.0$), and there was difference between Oxidized group and Uncoated implant group(p<0.05). In case of modified cell counting results by v/w% were RBM group($197.8{\pm}45.2$), Oxidized group($207.04{\pm}8.34$), Uncoated group($261.6{\pm}40.6$), SLA group($315.4{\pm}14.0$), and there was difference between RBM group and SLA group(p<0.05). 2. Optical density results of artificial dental plaque after ultrasonic treatment was that there was difference among groups, and optical density of RBM group was higher than that of Uncoated group(p<0.05). In case of modified optical density results by v/w%, there was difference among groups, and the modified optical density of Uncoated group and SLA group was higher than those of Oxidized group and RBM group(P>0.05). 3. SEM findings of artificial dental plaque on the surfaces of implant as follows; there were artificial dental plaque on the surfaces of all test implants. Streptococcus mutans and by-product were observed at 10,000 times magnified condition on all test implants. Adhesion area of artificial dental plaque was about 1/2 of total surface after 24 hours incubate at $37^{\circ}C$. These results showed that there were differences among implant surfaces on the growth of Streptococcus mutans, and bacteria and by-product were covered about 1/2 area of total implant surfaces at 24 hours incubate at $37^{\circ}C$.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Finger M, Guerra IR: Prosthetic consideration reconstructive implantology. Dent North Am 1986;30:69-83
  2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A: The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: part I surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90237-7
  3. Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME : Dental implant : A review. J Periodontol 1992;63:859-870 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  4. Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT : Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing Co., 1989
  5. Albreksson T, Zarb G, Worthinton P, et al. : The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and prognosis criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  6. Lavelle CL: Mucosal seal around end osseous dental implants. Oral Implantol 1981;9:357-371
  7. Silverstein LH, Garg A, Callan D, et al.: The key to success: maintaining the long-term health of implants. Dent Today 1998;17(2):104-108
  8. Silverstein LH, Kurtzman GM: Oral hygiene and maintenance of dental implants. Dent Today 2006;25(3):70-75
  9. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, et al.: Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. Clin Oral Impl Res 1992;3:9-16 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x
  10. Lang NP, Bragger U, Walther O, et al.: Ligature-induced periimplant infection in cynomolgus monkey. Clin Oral Impl Res 1993;4:2-11 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040101.x
  11. Shou S, Holmstrup P, Keiding NE: Microbiology of ligature- induced marginal inflammation around osseointegrated implants and ankylosed teeth in cynomolgus monkeys(Macaca fascicularis). Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:190-200 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070301.x
  12. Isidor E: Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-152 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x
  13. Isidor E: Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x
  14. Gristina AG: Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588-1595 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3629258
  15. Gibbons RJ, J. van Houte: Bacterial adherence in oral microbial ecology. Annu Rev Microbiol 1975;29:19-44 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.29.100175.000315
  16. Nakazato G, Tsuchiya H, Sato M: In vivo plaque formation on implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:321-326
  17. Slots J, Rams TE: Microbiology of periodontal disease, p. 425-443. In Slots J, Taubman MA (ed), Contemporary oral microbiology and immunology. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, Mo 1992
  18. 이승호, 구영, 이용무, et al.: 타이태늄 임플란트 표면에 형성된 타액성 단백질에 관한 생체연구. 대한치주과학회지 2003;33(2):127-137
  19. 이선구, 임성빈, 정진형, et al.: 다양한 구강위생기구를 이용하여 임플란트 표면의 Prophylaxis 시행시 표면형태의 변화분석. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34(1):1-17
  20. 김우영, 이만섭, 박준봉, et al.: 염산테트라싸이클린의 적용시간에 따른 임플란트 표면변화에 관한 주사전자현미경적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(3):523-537
  21. 송우석, 권영혁, 이만섭, et al.: 구연산의 적용시간에 따른 임플란트 표면변화에 대한 주사전자현미경적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(4):697-709
  22. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al.: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental imlplants. A review of proposed criteria of sucess. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  23. Meffert RM: The soft tissue interface in dental implantology. Int J Oral Implatol 1988;5:55-58
  24. Bruser D, Warrer K, Karring T, et al.: Titanium implants with a true periodontal ligament; An alternative to osseiointergrated implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:113-116
  25. Hemidahl A, Kondell P, Nord CE, et al.: Effect of insertion of osse- ointegrated prosthesis on the oral microflora. Swed Dent J 1983;41:199-204
  26. Christersson CE, Fornalik MS, Baier RE, et al.: In vitro attachment of oral microorganisms to solid surfaces. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:151-158
  27. Fijioka HY, Akagawa Y, Minagi S, et al.: Adherence of streptococcus mutans to implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:913-920 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210707