Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Fermentation Ability of Microbes for Whole Crop Rice Silage Inoculant

총체 벼 사일리지용 미생물의 발효능력 평가

  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study on the evaluation of fermentation ability of microbes for whole crop rice silage Inoculant at National Institute of Animal Science, RDA from 2004 to 2005. We collected 28 strains of microbes from whole crop rice silage. According to acidity and growth ability, 5 strains of microbes was isolated (R4-1, R7-1, R7-2, R10-1, R12-1). The cultures of 4 strains were identified to be Lactobacillus plantarum (R4-1, R7-1, R7-2 and R10-1) and one was identified to be Lactobacillus pentosus (R12-1). Whole crop rice was harvested at the yellow ripen stage. It was ensiled in experimental silos (20ℓ capacity) with or without microbial additives (R4-1, R7-1, R7-2, R10-1, R12-1 and three commercial inoculant) and stored at room temperature for 60d. The pH value and acetic acid content of additivetreated silages were lower and lactic acid content was higher than those of the control (p<0.05). There was a trend for acetic acid content to be lowest and lactic acid to be highest in R7-1 treated silage. Crude protein (CP) contents of R7-2 treated silage was higher and acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents of R7-1 treated silage was lower (p<0.05). Although some strains of inoculant could improve silage quality, L. plantarum R7-1 was more effective as an inoculant for whole crop rice silage. This microbe was named NLRI 401 and registered in the Korea Agricultural Culture Collection.

본 시험은 사료용 총체 벼 사일리지 전용 미생물 첨가제 개발을 위하여 2003년부터 2005년까지 축산연구소에서 수행되었다. 새로운 총체 벼 전용 첨가제 개발을 위해 수집된 28점의 총체 벼 사일리지로부터 미생물을 선발하여 전체 5개 균주(R4-1, R7-1, R7-2, R10-1 및 R12-1)를 분리하였다. 분리된 균주중 4종(R4-1, R7-1, R7-2 및 R10-1)은 Lactobacillus plantarum으로 동정되었고 R12-1은 L. pentosus로 동정되었다. 황숙기에 수확된 총체 벼는 사일리지를 제조할때 선발된 5개 균주 이외에 시중에서 판매되는 첨가제 3종을 접종을 하여 60일간 실온에서 저장한 후 평가한 결과는 다음과 같다. 저장된 사일리지의 pH와 초산 함량은 첨가제를 처리한 구에서 낮았고 젖산 함량은 높았다(p<0.05). 특히 R7-1은 초산 함량이 가장 낮았고 젖산 함량이 가장 높았다. 조단백질 함량은 R7-2 첨가제 처리구에서 가장 높았으며 ADF 및 NDF 함량은 R7-1에서 가장 낮았다(p<0.05). 선발된 균주들은 대부분 사일리지 품질개선효과를 나타내었으나 R7-1이 그 중에서 가장 효과적이었다. 본 미생물은 한국농용미생물 협회에 NLRI 401로 등록되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김종근. 1999.수확시기 및 제조방법이 라운드 베일 호밀 사일리지의 품질 및 사료가치에 미치 는 영향.서울대학교 박사학위 논문
  2. 김종근. 정의수.서 성. 김맹중. 이종경. 윤세형. 임영철. 조용민. 2008. 수확시기 및 품종이 총 체 벼 사일리지의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지 28(1):29-34 https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.1.029
  3. 농림부 통계자료. 2007
  4. Cai Yimin. 2005. 사료용 총체 벼 사일리지 품 질 개선 기술.축산연구소.사료용 총체 벼 생산․ 이용 기술 국제 심포지엄 proceeding. pp. 103- 135
  5. Ogawa, Masuhiro. 2003. Research of whole crop rice silage utilization in Japan.축산기술연구소. 사료용 총체 벼 재배․이용 국제 세미나 proceed- ings. pp. 25-58
  6. A.O.A.C. 1991. Official method of analysis. Washington DC
  7. Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC
  8. Hristove, A.N. and T.A. McAllister. 2002. Effect of inoculants on whole-crop barley silage fermentation and dry matter disappearance in situ. J. Anim. Sci. 80:510-516
  9. Keady, T.W.J., R.W.J. Steen, D.J. Kilpatrick and C.S. Mayne. 1994. Effects of inoculant treatment on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake by growing cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 49:284-294 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02003.x
  10. McAllister, T.A., L.B. Selinger, L.R. McMahon, H.D. Bae, T.J. Lysyk, S.J. Oosting and K.J. Cheng. 1995. Intake, digestibility and aerobic stability of barley silage inoculated with mixtures of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 75:425-432 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas95-062
  11. McDonald, P., N. Henderson and S. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, U. K
  12. McDonald, P., N. Henderson and S. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, U. K
  13. Muck, R.E. 1993. The role of silage additives in making high quality silage. In: Silage Production from Seed to Animal. Proc. National Silage Production Conf., Syracuse, New York. pp. 106- 116
  14. Patterson, D.C., C.S. Mayne, F.J. Gordon and D. J. Kilpatrick. 1997. An evaluation of an inoculant/ enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 52:325-335 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1997.tb02363.x
  15. Seale, D. R. 1986. Bacterial inoculants as silage additive. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61(Suppl.) : 9s-26s
  16. Smith, E.J., A.R. Henderson, J.D. Oldham, D.A. Whitaker, K. Aitcheson, D. H. Anderson, and J. M. Kelly. 1993. The influence of an inoculant/ enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage offered in combination with three levels of concentrate supplementation on performance of lactating dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 56:301-310
  17. Steen, R.E.J., E.F. Unsworth, H.I. Gracey, S.J. Kennedy, R. Anderson and D.J. Kilpatrick. 1989. Evaluation studies in the development of a commercial bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. 3. Responses in growing cattle and interaction with protein supplementation. Grass Forage Sci. 44:381-390 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01936.x
  18. Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Bri. Grassl.Soc. 18:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Cited by

  1. Effect of Seeding Methods and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates on the Forage Quality and Productivity of Whole Crop Rice vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.2.87
  2. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria for use as silage additives vol.52, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2016.6060