Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

Desirability Function Modeling for Dual Response Surface Approach to Robust Design

  • Kwon, You Jin (Department of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Young Jin (Department of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Cha, Myung Soo (Department of Industrial Engineering Kyungsung University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many quality engineering practitioners continue to have a considerable interest in implementing the concept of response surface methodology to real situations. Recently, dual response surface approach is extensively studied and recognized as a powerful tool for robust design. However, existing methods do not consider the information provided by customers and design engineers. In this regard, this article proposes a flexible optimization model that incorporates that information via desirability function modeling. The optimization scheme and its modeling flexibility are demonstrated through an illustrative example by comparing the proposed model with existing ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Box, G. E. P. (1985), Discussion of Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Methods, Journal of Quality Technology, 17, 189-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1985.11978965
  2. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
  3. Copeland, K. and Nelson, P. (1996), Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1996.11979683
  4. Del Castillo, E. and Mongomery, D. (1993), A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem, Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1993.11979454
  5. Del Castillo, E., Mongomery, D., and McCarville, D. (1996), Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1996.11979684
  6. Derringer, G. C. (1994), A Balancing Act: Optimizing a Product's Properties, Quality Progress, 27(6), 51-58.
  7. Derringer, G. C. and Suich, R. (1980), Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables, Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
  8. Harrington, E. C., Jr. (1965), The Desirability Function, Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494-498.
  9. Kim, K.-J. and Lin, D. (1998), Dual Response Surface Optimization: A Fuzzy Modeling Approach, Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1998.11979814
  10. Lin, D. and Tu, W. (1995), Dual Response Surface Optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1995.11979556
  11. Myers, R. H. (1971), Response Surface Methodology. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, MA.
  12. Myers, R. H. and Carter, W. H. (1973), Response Surface Techniques for Dual Response Systems, Technometrics, 15, 301-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/1266990
  13. Myers, R. H.; Khuri, A. I.; and Carter, W. H. (1989), Response Surface Methodology: 1966-1988, Technometrics, 31, 137-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268813
  14. Vining, G. G. and Myers, R. H. (1990), Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach, Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1990.11979204