Reproductive and Developmental Biology

  • 제32권2호
  • /
  • Pages.127-133
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1738-2432(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0151(eISSN)
한국동물번식학회 (The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction)
권호 표지

Correlations between Sperm Motility, SCSA (Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay), Reproductive Performance and Heterospermic Fertility in Boars

  • 발행 : 2008.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The objective of this study was two folds: to investigate the relationship between paternal identification rate and sperm quality parameters such as motility and sperm chromatin structure assay after heterospermic insemination; to see if mutual complement between tests and development of useful technique to enhance the fertility in artificial insemination. In individual boar's fertilizing ability, 3 high fertility boars showed significantly high fertility (p<0.05) compared to 3 low fertility boars, but there was no difference in litter size between two groups. Sperm motility test in pooled and individual semen using computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA) revealed that no significant difference among boars. The high fertile boar showed tendency of low %Red (High red fluorescence/green+red fluorescence) in sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) but paternal identification rate from piglets did not differ after heterospermic insemination. The correlation coefficient between individual or pooled semen function test and farrowing rates were well correlated as follows: %Red with litter size (r= - 0.53, p=0.03); %Red with paternal identification rates (r=-0.51, p=0.03); paternal identification rates with litter size (r=0.57, p=0.02). These results indicate that sperm chromatin structure assay and sperm quality parameter test in pooled semen are useful method to predict and evaluate the fertilizing capacity after heterospermic insemination in boars.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bielecki R, Zini A, Phang D, Zenzes MT (2001): Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 75: 674-677 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01796-9
  2. Bochenek M, Smorg Z, Pilch J (2001): Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 56:557-567 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00588-X
  3. Boilard M, Bailey J, Collin S, Dufour M, Sirard MA (2002): Effect of bovine oviduct epithelial cell apical plasma membranes on sperm function assessed by a novel flow cytometric approach. Biol Reprod 67:1125-1132 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1125
  4. Boissenault G (2002): Chromatin remodelling during spermiogenesis; A possible role for the transition proteins in DNA strand break repair. FEBS Lett 514:111-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02380-3
  5. Carver-Ward JA, Moran-Verbeek IM, Hollanders JM (1997): Comparative flow cytometric analysis of the human sperm acrosome reaction using CD46 antibody and lectins. J Assist Reprod Genet 14: 111-119 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765780
  6. Clark LK, Schinckel AP, Singleton WL, Einstein ME, Teclaw RF (1989): Use of farrowing rate as a measure of fertility of boars. J Am Vet Med Assoc 194: 239-243
  7. Collins ED, Flowers WL, Shanks RD, Miller DJ (2008): Porcine sperm zona binding ability as an indicator of fertility. Animal Reproduction Science 104:69-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.01.012
  8. D'Cruz OJ, Haas GG (1996): Fluorescence-labeled fucolectins are superior markers for flow cytometric quantization of the human sperm acrosome reaction. Fertil Steril 65:843-851 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58224-7
  9. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewitz Z, Melamed MR (1982): Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem 30:279-280 https://doi.org/10.1177/30.3.6174566
  10. Evenson D, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz (1990): Acridine orange induced precipitation of mouse testicular sperm cell DNA reveals new patterns of chromatin structure. Exp Cell Res 187:328-334 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(90)90100-O
  11. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Baer RK, Turner TW, Schrader SM (1991): Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Toxicol 5: 115-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6238(91)90039-I
  12. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K (1999): Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 14:1039-1049 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039
  13. Evenson D, Jost L (2000): Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci 22:169-189 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009844109023
  14. Evenson D, Lorna Jost (2002): Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Fertil Steril 78:S191
  15. Gadea J, Matas C, Lucas X (1998): Prediction of porcine semen fertility by homologous in vitro penetration (hIVP) assay. Anim Reprod Sci 54:95-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00144-4
  16. Gadea J, Matas C (2000): Sperm factors related to in vitro penetration of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 54:1343-1357 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00458-1
  17. Galli A, Bosisio M (1988): Quality of semen stored at +15/16$^{\circ}C$ is related to fertility of artificially inseminated swine. Theriogenology 30:1185-1190 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(88)90294-4
  18. Garner DL, Johnson LA (1995): Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod 53:276-284 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.2.276
  19. Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WM (2005): Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 63:445-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.024
  20. Hammitt DG, Martin PA, Callanan T (1989): Correlations between heterospermic fertility and assays of porcine seminal quality before and after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 32:385-399 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(89)90005-8
  21. Hammerstedt RH (1996): Evaluation of sperm quality: Identification of the subfertile male and courses of action. Anim Reprod Sci 42:77-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01535-7
  22. Karabinus DS, Evenson DP, Kaproth MT (1991): Effects of egg yolk-citrate and milk extenders on chromatin structure and viability of cyopreserved bull sperm. J Dairy Sci 74:3836-3848 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78576-7
  23. Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP (2000): Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques. Human Rep 15:1717-1722 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1717
  24. Love CC, Thompson JA, Lowry VK, Varner DD (2002): Effect of storage time and temperature on stallion sperm DNA and fertility. Theriogenology 57:1135-1142 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00689-6
  25. Love CC, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL, Thompson JA, Blanchard TL, Varner DD (2005): Relationship of seminal plasma level and extender type to sperm motility and DNA integrity. Theriogenology 63: 1584-1591 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.05.030
  26. Marchetti C, Obert G, Deffosez A, Marchetti P (2002): Study of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm. Hum Reprod 17:1257-1265 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1257
  27. Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Matas C, Gadea J, Alonso MI, Roca J (1996): Oocyte penetration by fresh or stored diluted boar spermatozoa before and after in vitro capacitation treatments. Biol Reprod 55:134-140 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.1.134
  28. Nagy S, Jansen J, Topper EK, Gadella BM (2003): A triple stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma and acrosome membrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg yolk particles. Biol Reprod 68: 1828-1835 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.011445
  29. Petit JM, Ratinaud MH, Cordelli E, Spano M, Julien R (1995): Flow cytometry and sorting of mouse testis cells : DNA and mitochondrial changes during spermatogenesis. Cytometry 19:304-312 https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990190404
  30. Perez-Llano B, Lorenzo JL, Yenes P, Trejo A, Garcia- Casado P (2001): A short hypoosmotic swelling test for the prediction of boar sperm fertility. Theriogenology 56:387-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00571-4
  31. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR (2002): Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normospermic infertile men : A prospective study. Fertil Steril 78: 313-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03219-3
  32. Schmid TE, Kamischke A, Bollwein H, Nieschlag E, Brinkworth MH (2003): Genetic damage in oligozoospermic patients detected by fluorescence insitu hybridization, inverse restriction site mutation assay, sperm chromatin structure assay and the Comet assay. Hum Reprod 18:1474-1480 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg259
  33. Stahlberg R, Harhzius B, Weitze KF, Waberskila D (2000): Identification of embryo paternity using polymorphic dna markers to assess fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa after heterospermic insemination in boars. Theriogenology 53:1365-1373 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00279-X
  34. Thomas CA, Garner DL, DeJ-arnette JM, Marshall CE (1998): Effect of cryopreservation on bovine sperm organelle function and viability as determined by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 58:786-793 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.3.786
  35. Trish Berger, Martin Dally (2001): Do sire-dam interactions contribute significantly to fertility comparisons in heterospermic insemination trials Theriogenology 56:535-543 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00586-6
  36. Waberski D, Magnus F, Mendonca Ferreira F, Petrunkina AM, Weitze KF, Topfer-Petersen E (2005): Importance of sperm-binding assays for fertility prognosis of porcine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 63: 470-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.025
  37. Ward WS, Coffey DS (1990): Specific organization of genes in relation to the sperm nuclear matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:20-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81015-0
  38. Woelders H (1991): Overview of in vitro methods for evaluation of semen quality. Theriogenology 63: 470-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.025
  39. Zeng WX, Terada T (2001): Protection of boar spermatozoa from cold shock damage by 2-hydroxypropyl- beta-cyclodextrin. Theriogenology 55:615-627 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00430-7