Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.15-22
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지

중증 치주염에 의해 발거된 치아의 수평부착상실에 대한 연구

Horizontal attachment loss in extracted teeth due to severe periodontitis

  • 김진숙 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Kim, Jin-Suk (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The attachment level is strongly associated with tooth loss and provides useful information on patterns of destruction of the periodontium. The presence of horizontal attachment loss would not be detected in clinical measurement. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to estimate the patterns of periodontal destruction based on the attachment area and horizontal attachment loss in extracted teeth due to severe periodontitis. Materials and Methods: 307 teeth satisfied the criteria for assessment. An indirect method, based on digital images obtained from a digital camera and an image analysis program, was used to calculate the area of root surface and attachment loss and the extent of horizontal attachment loss. The data were analysed using SPSS. Results: No statistically significant differences among root surfaces were observed in anterior teeth on the loss of attachment area. However, in posterior teeth statistically significant differences in palatal surfaces of maxillary and mandibular premolar and molar surfaces compared with buccal surfaces were observed. Horizontal attachment loss was observed in 21.5% of the teeth examined. Frequency of horizontal attachment loss was highest in the maxillary first premolar (34.8%), followed by the maxillary second premolar (27.3%) and maxillary canine (25%). The mean length of horizontal attachment loss was 1.5mm. Conclusion: More meticulous examination will be needed of the palatal surfaces of maxillary and mandibular premolar and molar teeth. The percentage of teeth with horizontal attachment loss greater than 2.1 mm was 5.2%. Considering the length of curette blades, about 5.2% of teeth were not properly debrided. Therefore, Additional supportive therapy such as local drug delivery has to be considered in treatment of the first maxillary, second premolar and canine due to the high prevalence of horizontal attachment loss.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Martha E, Nunn ME. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: an overview of periodontal risk factors. Periodontol 2000 2003;32:11-23 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03202.x
  2. Magnusson I, Listgarten MA. Histological evaluation of probing depth following periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:26-31 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01946.x
  3. Hujoel P, Bollen AM, DeRouen TA. Quantification of periodontal attachment at single-rooted teeth. J Clin Perio- dontol 1989;16:224-228 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb01645.x
  4. Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC. Relationship between linear and area measurements of radiographic bone levels utilizing simple computerized techniques. J Periodontal Res 1984;19: 191-198 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1984.tb00807.x
  5. Hujoel P, Bollen AM, DeRouen TA. Quantification of periodontal attachment at multi-rooted teeth. J Clin periodontol 1992;19:193-196 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00638.x
  6. Klock KS, Gjerdet NR, Haugejorden O. Periodontal attachment loss assessed by linear and area measurements in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:443-447 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00386.x
  7. Brown R. A method of measurement of root area. J Can Dent Assoc 1950;16:130-132
  8. Jepsen A. Root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface area. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:35-46 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309019777
  9. Verdonschot EH, Sanders AJ, Plasschaert AJ. A computer-aided image analysis system for area measurement of tooth root surfaces. J Periodontol 1990;61:275-280 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.5.275
  10. Waerhaug J. A method for evaluation of periodontal problem on extracted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:160-168 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01738.x
  11. Saglie R, Johansen JR, Flotra L. The zone of completely and partially destructed periodontal fibers in pathological pockets. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:198-202 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01742.x
  12. Powell B, Garnick JJ. The use of extracted teeth to evaluate clinical measurements of periodontal disease. J Perio- dontol 1978;49:621-624 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.12.621
  13. Anerud KE, Robertson PB, Loe H et al. Periodontal disease in three young adult populations. J Periodontal Res 1983;18:655-668 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1983.tb00402.x
  14. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Manji F. Periodontal disease in adult kenyan. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:445-452 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01599.x
  15. Okamato H, Yoneyama T, Lindhe J, Haffajee A, Socransky S. Methods of evaluating periodontal disease data in epidemiological research. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:430-439 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01597.x
  16. Papapanou PN, Wennstrom JL, Grondahl K. Periodontal status in relation to age and tooth type. A cross-sectional radiographic study. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:469-478 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01602.x
  17. Yoneyama T, Okamoto H, Lindhe J, Sokransky SS, Haffajee AD. Probing depth, attachment loss and gingival recession. Finding from a clinical examination in Ushiku, Japan. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:581-591 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb02133.x
  18. Yamamoto T, Ishikawa A, Watanabe Y et al. Prevalence of horizontal attachment loss in extracted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:791-795 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00556.x
  19. Waerhaug J. Healing of the dento-epithelial junction following subgingival plaque control II: as observed on extracted teeth. J Periodontol 1978;49:119-134 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.3.119
  20. Hujoel PP. A meta-analysis of normal ranges for root surface areas of the permanent dentition. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:225-229 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00310.x
  21. Splieth C, Giesenberg J, Fanghanel J. Periodontal attachment level of extractions presumably performed for periodontal reasons. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:514-518 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290607.x
  22. Klock KS, Haugejorden O. In vitro determination of the forceps level for extraction of teeth for periodontal reasons. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:155-160 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00337.x
  23. Halazonetis TD, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Relationship of clinical parameters to attachment loss in subsets of subjects with destructive peridontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:563-568 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb02138.x
  24. Fox SC, Bosworth BL. A morphological survey of proximal root concavities: A consideration in periodontal therapy. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 114:811-814 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0167
  25. Leknes KN, Selvig KA. Root groove: a risk factor in periodontal attachment loss. J Periodontol 1994;65:859-863 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.859