Fashion & Textile Research Journal (한국의류산업학회지)

The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry (한국의류산업학회)
권호 표지

The Study on the Perceived Risk and Product Innovativeness Evaluation of Smart Clothing

스마트 의류의 지각된 위험과 제품혁신성 평가에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2008.08.07
  • Accepted : 2008.10.21
  • Published : 2008.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to explore the perceived risk of smart clothing, to classify consumers by risk perception of smart clothing, and to investigate the differences among the segmented groups in regard to the evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. In addition, the relationship among perceived risk, evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing were examined. A questionnaire was administered to 338 male and female subjects aged from 17 to 50. Analysis was performed by factor analysis, cluster analysis, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation analysis. The results showed that the perceived risk of smart clothing was composed of 4 factors: economic risk, social risk, functional risk and physical risk. Consumers were classified into four groups: high risk perception group, low economic risk perception group, low functional risk perception group, and low social risk perception group. ANOVA showed that there were significant differences among four groups regard to the evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. High risk perception group most highly evaluated the newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. There were positive correlation among the perceived risks, the evaluation of the newness and innovativeness of smart clothing.

Keywords

References

  1. 강경영, 진현정. (2007). 스마트 의류 newness와 혁신성 평가. 한국의류산업학회지, 9(5), 493-499
  2. 김종배. (1992). 신제품 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 실증적 연구. 마케팅 연구, 7(1), 121-145
  3. 김찬주. (1991). 의복구매시 소비자가 지각하는 위험에 관한 연구 I: 위험의 유형분류, 소비자 인구변인과의 관련을 중심으로. 한국의류학회지, 15(4), 405-416
  4. 박선형, 이주현. (2001). 웨어러블 컴퓨터(wearable computer) 개념을 기초로 한 디지털 패션 상품의 디자인 가능성 탐구 1. 패션비지니스학회지, 5(3), 111-128
  5. 박재진. (2004). 소비자 혁신성이 온라인쇼핑 행동에 미치는 영향: 혁 신기술수용모델을 중심으로. 광고연구, 63, 79-101
  6. 손미숙, 박준석, 한동원, 조일연. (2006). 웨어러블 시스템 사용자 상 호작용 시장 분석 및 기술 동향. 전자통신동향분석, 21(2), 184-191
  7. 옥선경, 이은영. (1986). 의복 구매시 인지되는 위험 유형과 정보원 활용과의 관계. 한국의류학회, 10(3), 49-61
  8. 유재미, 김상훈, 이유재. (2006). 제품혁신성 지각의 결정요인과 제품 수용의향과의 관계: 소비자 관점을 중심으로. 마케팅 연구, 21(2), 27-52
  9. 유필화, 이승희. (1994). 신제품수용시 소비자의 혁신저항에 관한 연 구: 혁신저항모형을 중심으로. 경영학연구, 23(3), 217-249
  10. 이규혜, 최자영. (2007). 패션 제품 온라인 쇼핑 시 지각되는 위험과 구매 의도의 관계에 있어서 태도의 역할. 복식문화연구, 15(3), 472-482
  11. 이정순. (2002). 스마트 의복의 전망 및 개발사례 연구. 충남생활과학연구지, 15, 64-75
  12. 조길수, 김주영, 김화연, 이명은, 이선. (2000). 디지털 의복. 섬유기술과 산업, 4(1), 148-157
  13. 조길수, 조자영. (2007). 미래 일상생활용 스마트 의류 기술 개발. 섬유기술과 산업, 11(2), 111-118
  14. 차세대 컴퓨팅 산업협회. (2006). 2005년도 차세대 PC산업 실태조사 . 자료검색일 2007, 10. 12, 자료출처 http://www.anci.or.kr
  15. 최선윤, 이정란. (2006). 스마트 의류 개발과 활용을 위한 소비자 인 식 조사. 한국의류산업학회지, 8(4), 420-426
  16. 최홍석. (2001). 전자상거래 특성이 지각된 위험 및 구매의도에 미치 는 영향에 관한 연구: 인터넷 쇼핑몰을 중심으로. 영남대학교 경 영대학원 석사학위 논문
  17. 허경옥. (2003). 소비자 위험인지가 소비자 만족도에 미치는 영향: 이 동전화 사용을 중심으로. 마케팅과학연구, 11, 165-181
  18. 황영미, 이정란. (2006). 스마트 의류 개발을 위한 소비자 선호도 조 사: 연령별 비교를 중심으로. 패션비지니스학회지, 10(4), 130-139
  19. Admit, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversation in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295 https://doi.org/10.2307/3149462
  20. Bass, F. M. (1980). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15, 215-227
  21. Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. S. Hancock (Ed.) Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Proceeding of the 43th Conference of the American Marketing Association (pp. 390). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association
  22. Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A product analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 243-248
  23. Blythe, J. (1999). Innovativeness and newness in high-tech consumer durables. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(5), 415-429 https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429910296028
  24. Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 466-476 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172631
  25. Engle, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior(4th ed.). Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press. pp. 321-326
  26. Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D. R., & Mazursky, D. (2001). The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science, 47, 69-84 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.69.10670
  27. Gourville, J. T. (2006). Eager sellers and stony buyers. Harvard Business Review, 27-37
  28. Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 362-375 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861
  29. Holak, S. Lehmann, D. R., & Sultan, F. (1987). The role of expectations in the adoption of innovative consumer durables: Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Retailing, 63, 243-259
  30. Horsky, D. (1990). A diffusion model incorporating product benefits price, income, and information. Marketing Science, 9, 342-365 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.4.342
  31. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. In M. Venkatesan (Ed.) Proceedings from 3rd Annual Conference (pp. 382-393). Association for Consumer Research
  32. Johannessen, J., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31 https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060110365547
  33. Karni, E. (1985). Increasing risk with state-dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 35(1), 172 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90068-7
  34. Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Cooper, R. G. (1991). The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8, 240-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(91)90046-2
  35. Lawton, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1980). The impact of the marketing concept on new product planning. Journal of Marketing, 44, 19-25 https://doi.org/10.2307/1250030
  36. Prasad, V. K. (1975). Socioeconomic product risk and patronage preferences of retail shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 39(3), 42-47 https://doi.org/10.2307/1250900
  37. Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208-218
  38. Sheth, J. N. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance: The less developed concept(LDC) in diffusion research. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.) Research in Marketing (pp.273-292). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Inc
  39. Tanawat, H., & Audhesh, P. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: Implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198 https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610674310
  40. Veryzer, R. W. Jr. (1998). Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 136-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00075-1
  41. Wearable computer market to grow 500% by '06. (2003, March 14). Venture Development Cooperation. Retrieved June 23, 2006, from http://vdc-corp.com