Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology

The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (대한전기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Robust and Computationally Efficient Optimal Design Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Using Adaptive Response Surface Method

  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents a robust and computationally efficient optimal design algorithm for electromagnetic devices by combining an adaptive response surface approximation of the objective function and($1+{\lambda}$) evolution strategy. In the adaptive response surface approximation, the design space is successively reduced with the iteration, and Pareto-optimal sampling points are generated by using Latin hypercube design with the Max Distance and Min Distance criteria. The proposed algorithm is applied to an analytic example and TEAM problem 22, and its robustness and computational efficiency are investigated.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Rippa, "An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation," Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 11, pp. 193-210, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018975909870
  2. L. Wang and D. Lowther, "Selection of approximation models for electromagnetic device optimization," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1227-1230, Apr. 2006 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.871954
  3. S. L. Ho et al., "A RSM based on improved compactly supported radial bases function and its application to rapid optimizations of electromagnetic devices," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2111-2117, Jun. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.848610
  4. J. Webb, "Construction of device performance models using adaptive interpolation and sensitivities," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1768-1771, May 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.845997
  5. X. K. Gao et al., "Robust design for torque optimization using response surface methodology," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1141-1144, Mar. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/20.996292
  6. D. Han and A. Chatterjee, "Adaptive response surface modeling-based method for analog circuit sizing," Proceedings of IEEE International SOC Conference, 2004, pp. 109-112
  7. Y. Yao, C. S. Koh, S. Yang, and G. Ni, "A Global Optimization algorithm based on $C^1$ piecewise response surface patches," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1629-1632, Apr. 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.892484
  8. S. L. Ho, P. H. Ni, S. Y. Yang, and K. F. Wong, "An adaptive interpolating moving least squares response surface model applied to the design optimizations of electromagnetic devices," Proc. of CEFC, 2006, pp. 59
  9. J. R. Koehler and A. B. Owen, Computer Experiments, Handbook of Statistics, Elsevier Science, New York, 1996, pp. 261-308
  10. B. Brandstaetter, "SMES optimization benchmark, TEAM problem 22, 3 parameter problem," http://www.igte.tu-graz.ac.at/archive/team_new/team3.php
  11. R. H. C. Takahashi, J. A. Vasconcelos, J. A. Ramirez, and L. Krahenbuhl, "A multiobjective methodology for evaluating genetic operators," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 39, pp. 1321-1324, May 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2003.810371

Cited by

  1. A Robust Global Optimization Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Utilizing Gradient Index and Multi-Objective Optimization Method vol.47, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2080664
  2. A Global Optimization Algorithm for Electromagnetic Devices by Combining Adaptive Taylor Kriging and Particle Swarm Optimization vol.49, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2238907
  3. Comparative Study on Kriging Surrogate Models for Metaheuristic Optimization of Multidimensional Electromagnetic Problems vol.51, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2361956
  4. Utilizing Kriging Surrogate Models for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices vol.50, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2284925
  5. A Numerically Efficient Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm: Combination of Dynamic Taylor Kriging and Differential Evolution vol.51, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2362938
  6. Co-Kriging Assisted PSO Algorithm and Its Application to Optimal Transposition Design of Power Transformer Windings for the Reduction of Circulating Current Loss vol.52, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2480868
  7. An Optimal Design of Large Scale Permanent Magnet Pole Shape Using Adaptive Response Surface Method With Latin Hypercube Sampling Strategy vol.45, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2012565