Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

EFFECT ON THE OSTEOGENESIS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS AFTER HORIZONTAL DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS WITH NITRIFIED DISTRACTOR

질화 표면처리된 신장기를 이용한 수평적 치조골신장술 후 임플란트 식립시 골유착 효과에 관한 연구

  • Park, Chul-Min (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Kyun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Moon, Seong-Yong (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Baik, Sung-Mun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Chul (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • 박철민 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김학균 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 문성용 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오지수 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 백성문 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 임성철 (조선대학교 의과대학 병리학교실)
  • Published : 2008.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated whether there is a difference between a conventional titanium distraction device and a TiN-coated device in terms of implant osseointegration after horizontal distraction osteogenesis in narrow alveolar bone. Four adult mongrel dogs, each weighing $9{\sim}10kg$, were used in this study. The lower premolars were extracted and horizontal distraction was performed with conventional titanium distraction devices (group 1) or TiN-coated devices (group 2). After an 8-week consolidation period, the implants were installed, and the dogs were sacrificed after another 8 weeks. The osseointegration around the implants was evaluated histomorphologically. There was one failure in experimental group 1 because of fracture of the device. Direct bone contact was achieved and there were no significant differences between the control group and experimental groups 1 and 2 in terms of osseointegration around the implants at 8 weeks. In summary, intraoral distraction osteogenesis is a good option for augmenting severely atrophied alveolar ridges, and the TiN-coated device may be useful because of its advantages, which include surface hardness, corrosion resistance, and reduced bacteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Codivilla A : On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Clin Orthop Apr 301 : 4, 1994
  2. Ilizarov GA : Basic principles of transosseous compression and distraction osteogenesis. Orthop Tranumatol Protez 32 : 7, 1971
  3. Ilizarov GA : The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 48 : 1, 1988
  4. Synder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM et al : Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plas Reconstr Surg 51 : 506, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  5. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199289010-00001
  6. Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C : Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 309, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90750-8
  7. Chin M, Toth BA : Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 454, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90120-2
  8. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Vrespa G et al : Bacterial adhesion on titanium nitride-coated and uncoated implants: an in vivo human study. J Oral Implantol. 29 : 80, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0080:BAOTNA>2.3.CO;2
  9. Tetsu T, Katsuyuki F, Hironari S et al : Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 291, 2004
  10. Fugazzotto PA : Report of 302 consecutive ridge augmentation procedures: Technical considerations and clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 : 358, 1998
  11. von Arx T, Cochran DL, Hermann JS et al : Lateral ridge augmentation and implant placement: An experimental study evaluating implant osseointegration in different augmentation materials in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 : 343, 2001
  12. Ley J, Cranin AN : Distraction osteogenesis for augmenting the deficient alveolar ridge in preparation for dental implant placement: a case report. J Oral Implantol 30 : 14, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2004)030<0014:DOFATD>2.0.CO;2
  13. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H : Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractions, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 15 : 701, 2000
  14. Davies J, Turner S, Sandy JR : Distraction osteogenesis-a review. Br Dent J 185 : 462, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809838
  15. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R et al : Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part I: clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 89, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2000.0033
  16. Tomoo O, Hidebaru S, Masataka Y et al : Horizontal Alveolar Distraction of the narrow maxillary ridge for implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 1530, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.009
  17. Nosaka Y, Kitano S, Wada K et al : Endosseous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 846, 2002
  18. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL : The electrochemical and mechanical behavior of passivated and TiN/AlN-coated CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V alloys. Biomaterials 25 : 851, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00606-9
  19. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL : In vitro corrosion testing of modular hip tapers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 64 : 78, 2003
  20. Kim SG : Mastery of OSSTEM implant. Koonja Publishing Co., 2007
  21. Bolton J, Hu X : In vitro corrosion testing of PVD coatings applied to a surgical grade Co-Cr-Mo alloy. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13 : 567, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015126810485
  22. Dalmiglio M, Schaaff P, Holzwarth U et al : The effect of surface treatments on the fretting behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008 (in press)
  23. Tamura Y, Yokotama A, Watari F et al : Surface properties and biocompatibility of nitrided titanium for abrasion resistant implant materials. Dent Mater J 21 : 355, 2002 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.355
  24. Huang HH, Hsu CH, Pan SJ et al : Corrosion and cell adhesion behavior of TiN-coated and ion-nitrided titanium for dental applications. Appl. Surf. Science 244 : 252, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.144
  25. Groessner-Schreiber B, Neubert A, Mu¨ller WD et al : Fibroblast growth on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res A 64 : 591, 2003