DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microleakage of Endodontic Temporary Restorative Materials under Dynamic Loading

동적하중 하에서 근관치료용 임시충전재의 미세누출의 평가

  • Jung, Dong-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Noh, Young-Sin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Doo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chang, Hoon-Sang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Ryu, Hyun-Wook (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Min, Kyung-San (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 정동호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 노영신 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이해두 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 장훈상 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 류현욱 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 민경산 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2008.05.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing abilities of four endodontic temporary restorative materials using a methylene blue dye penetration test under dynamic loading. Standardized access cavities were prepared in forty-four intact human permanent molar teeth, and the cavities were restored with Caviton, MD-Temp, IRM, or ZOE. After thermocycling, an intermittent load of 98 N at 1 Hz was applied for 1,000 cycles to the long axis of the functional cusp of each of the teeth, which were immersed in a 1% methylene blue solution. The teeth were split in half, and the linear depth of dye penetration was evaluated according to the criteria. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.05) and Duncan's multiple range test. The results demonstrated that Caviton and MD-Temp showed significantly lower microleakage than IRM and ZOE. It was concluded that Caviton and MD-Temp exhibited better sealing ability than IRM and ZOE under dynamic loading.

본 연구의 목적은 동적하중 하에서 네 종류의 근관치료용 임시충전재의 밀폐효과를 비교하는 것이다. 44개의 건전한 인간 대구치에 표준화된 근관와동을 형성한 후 Caviton, MD-Temp, IRM 및 ZOE를 이용하여 충전하였다. 이 후, 1% 메틸렌블루 용액에 담근 상태에서 반복하중기를 이용하여 1 Hz의 속도로 98 N의 하중을 기능교두에 1,000번 가한 다음 시편을 양분해 미세누출을 평가하고 one-way ANOVA (p = 0.05)와 사후 검정으로 Duncan's multiple range tests로 통계분석 하였다. Caviton 군과 MD-Temp군이 IRM군과 ZOE군보다 통계적으로 적은 미세누출을 보였으며 (p < 0.05), 본 실험결과로 볼 때 Caviton과 MD-Temp가 IRM과 ZOE보다 동적하중 하에서 근관와동 밀폐효과가 우수하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Noguera AP and McDonald NJ. A comparative in vitro coronal microleakage study of new endodontic restorative materials. J Endod 16:523-527, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80214-7
  2. Saunders WP and Saunders EM. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 10:105-108, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00533.x
  3. Delivanis PD, Chapman KA. Comparison and reliability of techniques for measuring leakage and marginal penetration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 53:410-416, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90444-3
  4. Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'sell C. Evaluation of temporary restorations'microleakage by means of electrochemical impedance measurements. J Endod 22:586-589, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80026-4
  5. Anderson RW, Powell BJ, Pashley DH. Microleakage of temporary restorations in complex endodontic access preparation. J Endod 15:526-529. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80194-3
  6. Krakow AA, de Stoppelaar JD, Gron P. In vivo study of temporary filling materials used in endodontics in anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 43:615-620, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90117-7
  7. Mayer T and Eickholz P. Microleakage of temporary restorations after thermocycling and mechanical loading. J Endod 23:320-322, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80414-1
  8. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Frayberg E, Abramovitz I, Metzger Z. Effect of repeated vertical loads on microleakage of IRM and calcium sulfate-based temporary fillings. J Endod 27:724-729, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00003
  9. Cruz EV, Shigetani Y, Ishikawa K, Kota K, Iwaku M, Goodis HE. A laboratory study of coronal microleakage using four temporary restorative materials. Int Endod J 35:315-320, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00446.x
  10. Jung SH, Min KS, Chang HS, Park SD, Kwon SN, Bae JM. Microleakage and fracture pat terns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent 98:270-276, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60100-0
  11. Webber RT, del Rio CE, Brady JM, Segall RO. Sealing quality of a temporary filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 46:123-130, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90446-2
  12. Anderson RW, Powell BJ, Pashley DH. Microleakage of three temporary endodontic restorations. J Endod 14:497-501, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80107-9
  13. Graf H. Bruxim. Dent Clin North Am 13:659-665, 1969
  14. Anderson DJ. Measurements of stress in mastication 1. J Dent Res 135:664-670, 1956
  15. Anderson DJ. Measurements of stress in mastication 2. J Dent Res 135:671?673, 1956
  16. Vail MM and Steffel CL. Preference of temporary restorations and spacers: a survey of Diplomates of the American Board of Endodontists. J Endod 32:513-515, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.009
  17. Widerman FH, Eames WB, Serene TP. The physical and biologic properties of Cavit. J Am Dent Assoc 82:378-382, 1971 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0068
  18. Lee YC, Yang SF, Hwang YF, Chueh LH, Chung KH. Microleakage of endodontic temporary restorative materials. J Endod 19:516-520, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81494-9
  19. Pai SF, Yang SF, Sue WL, Chueh LH, Rivera EM. Microleakage between endodontic temporary restorative materials placed at different times. J Endod 25:453-456, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80278-7

Cited by

  1. Coronal microleakage of four temporary restorative materials in Class II-type endodontic access preparations vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.29