FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF MANDIBULAR SYMPHYSIS DEFECTS USING RECONSTRUCTION PLATES

유한 요소법을 이용한 하악골 이부 결손수복에 사용된 재건용 금속판의 응력분포에 관한 연구

  • Oh, Jung-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Min, Jee-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Mun, Sung-Jun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Baek-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 오정환 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 한정수 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 민지현 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 문성준 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이백수 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.11.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate distribution and maximal value of mechanical stresses on the reconstruction plate, bridging mandibular symphysis defect, and to optimize the most appropriate locations of the plate to distribute the stress causing the fracture of the plate. Materials and methods: Four types of reconstruction were constructed by different number and location of the reconstruction plates on the 3 D finite element model (FEM) of a human edentulous mandible; Type I: one plate on the inferior border of the anterior mandible, Type II: one plate on the middle of the anterior mandible, Type III: one plate on the superior border of the anterior mandible, and Type IV: two plates on the inferior and superior border of the anterior mandible. Results: The results showed that the maximal stress of type I (234.29 Mpa) was lower than that of type II (260.91 Mpa) and type III (247.37 Mpa), but higher than that of type IV (186.64 Mpa). We could also observe that the stresses are tending to focus on the inner side and inferior part of the plate which connected proximal segment from the vertical load. Conclusions: On the basis of the findings, it was concluded that using a plate on the inferior border of mandible or two plates on the inferior and superior border of mandible are more favorable to distribute mechanical stresses, which could reduce the fracture of the plate.

Keywords

References

  1. Schupp W, Arzdorf M, Linke B et al : Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 : 924, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.306
  2. Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H et al : Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37 : 597, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.03.002
  3. Curtis DA, Plesh O, Hannam AG et al : Modeling of jaw biomechanics in the reconstructed mandibulectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 81 : 167, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70244-1
  4. Shibahara T, Noma H, Furuya Y et al : Fracture of mandibular reconstruction plates used after tumor resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 182, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.29817
  5. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G et al : Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 31 : 18, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01179.x
  6. Maurer P, Pistner H, Schubert J : Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 10 : 37, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-005-0656-y
  7. Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P : Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34 : 201, 2006
  8. Curtis DA, Plesh O, Miller AJ et al : A comparison of masticatory function in patients with or without reconstruction of the mandible. Head Neck 19 : 287, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199707)19:4<287::AID-HED7>3.0.CO;2-X
  9. Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW et al : Primary mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate: evaluation of 51 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 : 93, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199507000-00014
  10. Gullane PJ : Primary mandibular reconstruction: analysis of 64 cases and evaluation of interface radiation dosimetry on bridging plates. Laryngoscope 101 : 1, 1991
  11. Boyd JB : Use of reconstruction plates in conjunction with soft-tissue free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 21 : 69, 1994
  12. Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Kroll SS et al : Use of the AO plate for immediate mandibular reconstruction in cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 88 : 588, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199110000-00005
  13. Schoning H, Emshoff R : Primary temporary AO plate reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86 : 667, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90201-3
  14. Katakura A, Shibahara T, Noma H et al : Material analysis of AO plate fracture cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 348, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.009
  15. Lindqvist C, Soderholm AL, Salo A et al : A comparative study on four screw-plate locking systems in sheep: a clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 160, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2000.0037
  16. Ueyama Y, Naitoh R, Yamagata A et al : Analysis of reconstruction of mandibular defects using single stainless steel A-O reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 858, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90536-4
  17. Markwardt J, Pfeifer G, Eckelt U et al : Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling. Onkologie 30 : 121, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1159/000098848
  18. Korkmaz HH : Evaluation of different miniplates in fixation of fractured human mandible with the finite element method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 : 1, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.016
  19. Korioth TW, Hannam AG : Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res 73 : 56, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730010801