DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Variations of Serving Sizes and Composition of Manufactured Milk and Soymilk Products and Implications for Dietary Assessment

시판되는 우유와 두유 제품의 제공량 및 성분의 다양성이 식이섭취조사에 미치는 영향

  • Noh, Hwa-Young (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang, Eun-Joo (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shim, Jae-Eun (Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Min-Kyung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University) ;
  • Paik, Hee-Young (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University)
  • 노화영 (서울대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 장은주 (서울대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 심재은 (서울대학교 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 박민경 (서울대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 백희영 (서울대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Published : 2008.02.29

Abstract

Accuracy of dietary assessment depends on correct estimation of quantity as well as correct data on composition of the products. Milk and soymilk were considered quite homogeneous in items of package size and composition. One serving size of fluid milk and soymilk is considered 200 mL but there are products with different amounts on the market. This study was conducted to investigate variations of amounts and composition of fluid milk and soymilk products of one portion siz on Korean market. Twenty-nine milk products were purchased and categorized into 8 groups-regular, low-fat, skim, chocolate, strawberry-flavored, banana-flavored, and black soybean-added. Sixteen fluid soymilk products were purchased and categorized into 4 groups-regular, infant, black sesame or black soybean added and others. Actual volume of each product was measured by mass cylinder and compositions of major nutrients on the package were compared to the values in the most widely used nutrient DB in Korea. Amounts of milk specified on the package of purchased products were 182.3-318.5 ml, the largest being banana-flavored milk. Amounts of soy milk were 184.3-240.5 mL, the largest being regular soymilk. Measured amount of each products were close to the amount on the package (<5%). Contents of macronutrients on the package were different from the food composition table in several products. The amounts of calcium varied greatly among the products due to the popularity of adding calcium to milk and soymilk products recently. These variations in the amount and contents of major nutrients in milk and soymilk products can lead to considerable error to the results of dietary assessment unless the amount and the composition of each product are regularly updated in the food composition table whenever the new products are introduced in the market.

Keywords

References

  1. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. 2004. Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 12(3): 562-568 https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.64
  2. Kim OH, Kim ES, Yu IS. 2002. A Study on the Current Status of Calcium Fortification in the Processed Foods in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 31(1):170-176 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.1.170
  3. Korea Association of Conveniences Stores. 2006. Operating trend of convenience stores. 80-81 (http://www.cvs.co.kr)
  4. Korea Dairy Industries Association. 2006. List of new milk products by year, 2004-2005 (http://www.koreadia.or.kr/)
  5. Korea Health Industry Development Institute In Ministry of Health and Wealth. 2005. Report on 2005 National Health and Nutrition Survey (Nutrition survey )
  6. Kral TVE, Rolls BJ. 2003. Energy density and portion size: their independent and combined effects on energy intake. Physiology & Behavior. 82:131-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.063
  7. Ministry of Health and Wealth. 1998. Basic DB supplementation for National Health and Nutrition Survey
  8. Nielson SJ, Popkin BM. 2003. Patterns and Trends in food portion sizes, 1997-1998. JAMA. 289:450-453 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.4.450
  9. Nonghyup. 2006. Nonghyup Internet Hanaro Club(http://shopping. nonghyup.com)
  10. Pyun JW, Hwang IK. 1996. Preparation of Calcium-fortified Soymilk and in Vitro Digestion Properties of Its Protein and Calcium. Korean J. Food Sci Technol. 28(6):995-1000
  11. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. 2006. Larger Portion sizes Lead a Sustained Increase in Energy Intake Over 2 Days. J. Am Diet Assoc. 106:543-549 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.014
  12. Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS. 2002. Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 76(6):1207-1213 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1207
  13. Rolls BJ, Engell D, Birch LL. 2000. Serving portion size influences 5- year-old but not 3-year-old children's food intakes. J Am Diet Assoc. 100(2):232-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00070-5
  14. Shinsegae Emart. 2006. Emart Internet Shopping Mall (http://www. emart.co.kr)
  15. Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Micle SJ. 2003. Food commonly eaten in the United States, 1989-1991 and 1994-1996: Are portion sizes changing?. J Am Diet Assoc. 103: 41-47
  16. The Korean Nutrition Society. 2005. Dietary Reference Intakes For Koreans
  17. Young JR, Nestle M. 1995. Food labels consistently underestimate the actual weights of single-serving baked products. J Am Diet Assoc. 95(10):1150-1151 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00309-6
  18. Young JR, Nestle M. 1995. Portion sizes in dietary assessment: Issues and policy implications. Nutr Rev. 53(6):149-158 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1995.tb01542.x
  19. Young LR, Nestle M 2002. The contribution of expanding portion size to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health. 92:246-249 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.2.246
  20. Young LR, Nestle M. 2003. Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc. 103:231-234 https://doi.org/10.1053/jada.2003.50027
  21. Williamson DA, Davis Martin P, Allen HR, Most MM, Alfonso A, Thomas V, Ryan DH. 2002. Changes in food intake and body weight associated with basic combat training. Mil Med. 167:248-253 https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/167.3.248