한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제28권8호
  • /
  • Pages.901-921
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석

Analysis of Elementary Teachers' Views on Barriers in Implementing Inquiry-based Instructions

  • 발행 : 2008.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 초등학교 과학과 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식을 조사하는 것이다. 이 연구의 목적을 위해 경기도에서 5년 이상 근무경력을 가진 초등 교사 22명을 대상으로 반구조화된 심층 면담을 실시하였다. 면담 질문은 자료의 삼각측정법을 통해 신빙성을 확보할 수 있도록 Seidman(1998)의 면담 단계에 따라 생성하였으며, 예비 면담을 통해 분석적 유도 방법으로 면담 질문을 수정 보완하였다. 면담은 개별로 진행되었으며 모든 면담 내용은 녹음 및 기록하였다. 연구 결과는, 외적 저해 요인과 내적저해 요인으로 분석되었다. 외적 요인으로 교사들이 제시한 내용은 시간 부족, 시설 및 자료의 부족, 학생의 능력 부족, 다인수 학급, 교육과정 상의 문제점, 탐구에 대한 평가의 어려움, 선행학습으로 인한 방해, 안전사고의 위험성, 전문성 향상 기회 부족이었다. 내적 저해 요인으로는 교사의 준비 부족, 탐구 수업의 비효율성, 교사의 배경지식 부족, 교사의 지도능력 부족, 자신감 부족, 인내심 부족 등이었다. 교사들이 제시한 저해 요인들과 그 원인을 심도있게 분석하였고 과학교육학의 관점에서 탐구교육의 활성화를 위한 제언을 하였다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary teachers' views on the barriers in implementing inquiry-based instruction in science education. For this, semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed with 22 elementary school teachers who have served for more than five years in the Gyeonggi province. The interview questions were developed through triangulation of Seidman's phase to achieve reliability in the interview data, then interview questions were modified and completed through an analytic induction method in pre-interviews. In-depth interviews were performed individually and all the interviews were recorded. The data of teachers' views on the barriers were categorized and analyzed into external and internal factors of teachers. The study found that the external factors referred by teachers included the following; the lack of a unit time, lack of materials and equipments, too many students in a class, problems in science curriculum management, difficulty in the assessment of students' inquiry activities, the students' learning, lack of opportunities for teaching inquiry activities, harmfulness of accidents, and so on. Internal factors included the following; lack of preparation for inquiry activities, lack of self-confidence, lack of patience, and so on. The various barriers presented and their causes were analyzed in detail, and possible efforts in activating inquiry activities in elementary science education were suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김정애, 노석구(2003). 제7차 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학 교과서의 체제와 내용에 대한 인식조사. 초등과학교육, 22(1), 37-50
  2. 김찬진(2002). 사설학원 없는 교육환경 조성. 경제교육연구, 8(1), 33-49
  3. 노석구, 여상인, 장병기, 임채성, 송민영(2002). 제7차 과학과 교육과정에 관한 초등 교사의 인식. 초등과학교육, 21(2), 213-226
  4. 박정희, 김정률, 박예리(2004). 탐구 학습에 관한 중등 과학 교사들의 인식. 한국지구과학학회지, 25(8), 731-738
  5. 박현주(2004). 중학생의 학원 과학교육과 학교 과학교육에 대한 인식 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 309-319
  6. 송경혜, 이항로, 임청환(2004). 초등학교 고학년 학생의 과학 탐구능력 측정을 위한 평가 도구 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1245-1255
  7. 신현옥, 이기영, 김찬종(2005). 초등 과학 포트폴리오 평가와 다른 과학 평가 방법 간의 상관관계 분석. 초등과학교육, 24(3), 301-309
  8. 양일호, 조현준, 한인경(2006). 초등과학교육에서 실험활동의 목적에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6(1), 235-252
  9. 이돈희, 곽병선, 최석진, 허경철, 조난심, 박순경, 홍후조, 소경희(1997). 제7차 교육과정 개정에 따른 교과교육과정 개발 체제에 관한 연구. 한국교육개발원, 연구보고 CR 97-36, 12-21
  10. 이명제(2004). 과학교육과정 개혁 연구의 쟁점들. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), 916-929
  11. 이봉우(2005). 외국 과학교육과정의 탐구기준 비교 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7), 873-884
  12. 이양락(2004). 교육과정 개발 체제 및 총론과 과학과 교육과정의 연계성 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 468-480
  13. 이현욱, 심규철, 여성희, 장남기(1998). 중고등학교 과학 교사의 탐구 수업 환경 요인에 관한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), 443-450
  14. 임채성(2002). 초등학교 '과학' 교과서와 '실험관찰' 생물영역의 탐구요구수준 분석. 2002년 한국생물교육학회 하계 학술발표대회 초록집. 한국생물교육학회
  15. 정은영, 홍미영(2004). 초등학교 과학과 실험 및 관찰 수업 사례에서 나타난 수업의 문제점: 도시 지역의 수업 사례를 중심으로. 초등과학교육, 23(4), 287-296
  16. 한기애, 노석구(2003). 제7차 초등학교 과학과 교사용 지도서의 활용 실태 분석. 초등과학교육, 22(1), 51-64
  17. 홍미영(2002). 우리나라 중학생들의 과학적 탐구 및 과학의 본성 영역에서의 국제 성취도 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), 336-344
  18. 홍미영(2004). 초등학교 과학 수업에서의 실험실 안전 교육 내용 분석. 교육과정평가연구, 7(2), 267-283
  19. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
  20. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teacher. Science Education, 81(1), 29-50 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:1<29::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-3
  21. Akerson. V. L. (2005). How do elementary teachers compensate for incomplete science content knowledge? Research in Science Education, 35(2-3), 245-268 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3176-8
  22. Akerson, V. L., Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of young children's ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 363-385 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<363::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-#
  23. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  24. Anderson, R. D., & Helms, J. V. (2001). The Ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 3-16 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V
  25. Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. (2004). The basics of communication research. CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning
  26. Beck, J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers' beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323-343 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009481115135
  27. Bradley, A. (1999). Zeroing in on teachers: Quality counts '99. Education Week, 18(17), 46-52
  28. Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A. Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers' views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784-802 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20151
  29. Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835-868 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10113
  30. Bybee, R. W. (2004). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Scientific inquiry and nature of science, (pp. 1-14). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  31. Costenson, K., & Lawson, A. E. (1986). Why isn't inquiry used in more classrooms? The American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150-158 https://doi.org/10.2307/4448241
  32. Davis, K. S. (2003). Change is hard: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037
  33. Dickinson, V. L., & Flick, L. B. (1996). How to succeed in physics without really crying. Science and Children, 33(8), 37-38
  34. Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453-467 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20130
  35. Gallagher, J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-133 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750111
  36. Hassard, J. (2005). The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle school and high school. NY: Oxford University Press
  37. Hogan, K., & Berkowitz, A. R. (2000). Teachers as inquiry learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 1-25 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009468730080
  38. Ibrahim, A. I. (2003). Design and initial validation of an instrument for measuring teacher beliefs and experiences related to inquiry teaching and learning and scientific inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University
  39. Inverness Research Associates (1999). Critical elements for the systemic reform of elementary education in urban districts(Reform: Supporting Reform Report. (pp. III-1- 22). Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://www.inver ness-research.org/reports/reports_proj.html.pdf
  40. Jarrett, O. S. (1998). Playfulness: A motivatior in elementary science teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 98(4), 181-187 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17414.x
  41. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. Van Zee (Eds), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, (pp. 283-315). Washington, DC: AAAS Publication
  42. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-523 https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_3
  43. Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 241-258 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4585-2
  44. Mao, S., & Chang, C. (1998). Impacts of an inquiry teaching method on earth science students' learning outcomes and attitudes at the secondary school level. Proceedings of the National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(3), 93-101
  45. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  46. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Principals, techniques, analysis. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Longman
  47. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press
  48. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press
  49. Plourde, L. A. (2002). The influence of student teaching on preservice elementary teachers' science selfefficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(4), 245-253
  50. Rankin, L. (2000). Lessons learned: Addressing common misconceptions about inquiry by Lynn Rankin. In foundations, a monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education. Arlington, VA: The National Science Foundation
  51. Reiff, R. (2002). If inquiry is so great, why isn't everyone doing it? Paper presented at the annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, January 10-13, 2000. Charlotte, NC
  52. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000070261
  53. Rop, C. F. (2002). The meaning of student inquiry questions: A teacher's beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717-736 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095294
  54. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. NY: Teachers College Press
  55. Shapiro, B. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the "face of science that does not yet know". Science Education, 80(5), 535-560 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<535::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-C
  56. Smolleck, L. D., Zembal-Saul, C., & Yoder, E. P. (2006). The development and validation of an instrument to measure preservice teachers' self-efficacy in regard to the teaching of science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 137-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9015-6
  57. Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 2-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10204.x
  58. Thompson, S. L. (2003). Development of a framework to measure science teachers' inquiry perceptions and practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, January 29-February 2, 2003. ST. Louis, MO
  59. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80(2), 223-241 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199604)80:2<223::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-I
  60. Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 374-379 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18179.x
  61. Trautmann, N., Makinster, J., & Avery, L. (2004). What makes inquiry so hard?(And why is it worth it?). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April 1-3, 2004. Vancouver, BC, Canada
  62. Uno, G. E. (1997). Learning about learning through teaching about inquiry. In A. P. McNeal & C. D'Avanzo (Eds.), Student-active science: Models of innovation in college science teaching, (pp. 189-198). Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing
  63. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 147-158
  64. Veermans, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Patterns of guidance in inquiry learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 179-194
  65. Wellington, J. J. (1998). Practical work in school : Time for a re-appraisal, In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in School Science. NY: Routledge, 3-15
  66. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the Classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
  67. White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 761-774 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180703
  68. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experience reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Teacher Education, 87(1), 112-143
  69. Yung, B. H. W. (2001). Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 985-1005 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010017129