Manual Liquid-Based Cytology (Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$) in Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology: Comparison with the Conventional Smears

유방의 세침흡인 세포검사: 수기 액상세포검사법(Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$)과 고식적 도말법과의 비교

  • Jeong, Ji-Yun (Department of Patholog, KyungPook National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Shik (Department of Patholog, KyungPook National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Su (Department of Patholog, KyungPook National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hye-Jung (Department of Radiology, KyungPook National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Ji-Young (Department of Patholog, KyungPook National University Hospital)
  • 정지윤 (경북대학교병원 병리과) ;
  • 김정식 (경북대학교병원 병리과) ;
  • 김영수 (경북대학교병원 병리과) ;
  • 김혜정 (경북대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 박지영 (경북대학교병원 병리과)
  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast is a useful method for diagnosing breast lesions. Yet making the definite diagnosis with performing FNA is limited by some problems, such as the low cellularity, the poor preservation and the obscuring background. Recent studies have found that liquid-based cytology solves such problems, but it is an expensive method and it is limited by the loss of the background information. The purpose of this study is to compare the Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$, a new manual liquid-based method of cytology, and the conventional smears for analyzing breast FNA cytology materials. A total of 31 randomized FNA specimens of breast were studied. In each case, both the conventional smears and the Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$ method were performed, and the smears were evaluated for cellularity, cellular preservation, the background, the cytologic features and the architectural arrangement. The cellularity and architectural arrangement were equal for both preparations. The Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$ specimens showed better cellular preservation, loss of the obscuring background, no overlapping of cells and a smaller area to screen compared with the conventional smears. Moreover, it has the potential advantages of being able to use the remaining specimens for immunohistochemical study and ploidy analysis, and it can reduce the costs for preparation compared with the other liquid-based methods of cytology. But some background information is lost in the Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$ specimens, the same as the other liquid-based methods of cytology. In conclusion, the Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$ and conventional smears showed good correlation, but they have their respective advantages and disadvantages. These results suggest that Liqui-$PREP^{TM}$ can contribute to making the accurate diagnosis with performing breast FNA cytology when it is used along with other methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Atamdede FI, Isaacs JH. The role of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Gynecol Oncol 1993;50: 159-63 https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1993.1185
  2. Kaufman Z, Shpitz B, Shapiro M, Rona R, Lew S, Dinbar A. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration. J Surg Oncol 1994;56:254-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930560413
  3. Collaco LM, de Lima RS, Werner B, Torres LF. Value of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Acta Cytol 1999;43:587-92 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331150
  4. Bedard YC, Pollett AF. Breast fine-needle aspiration. A comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:523-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/111.4.523
  5. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:368-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199704)16:4<368::AID-DC14>3.0.CO;2-I
  6. Dey P, Luthra UK, George J, Zuhairy F, George SS, Haji BI. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material. Acta Cytol 2000; 44:46-50 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326224
  7. Park G, Park G, Lee K, et al. Evaluation for cytopreservability of manual liquid-based cytology Liqui-PREP(TM) and its application to cerebrospinal fluid cytology: comparative study with cytospin. Korean J Cytopathol 2007;18:46-54
  8. Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10372
  9. Lee KR, Papillo JL, St John T, Eyerer GJ. Evaluation of the ThinPrep processor for fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1996;40:895-9 https://doi.org/10.1159/000333999
  10. Kontzoglou K, Moulakakis KG, Konofaos P, Kyriazi M, Kyroudes A, Karakitsos P. The role of liquid-based cytology in the investigation of breast lesions using fine-needle aspiration: a cytohistopathological evaluation. J Surg Oncol 2005;89:75-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20190
  11. Nasuti JF, Tam D, Gupta PK. Diagnostic value of liquidbased (Thinprep) preparations in nongynecologic cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:137-41 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200102)24:2<137::AID-DC1027>3.0.CO;2-5
  12. Linder J. Recent advances in thin-layer cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:24-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199801)18:1<24::AID-DC5>3.0.CO;2-U
  13. Yamashita A, Sakuma K, Shiina Y. Standardization of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast - comparison of Auto Cyto Fix and conventional smears. Cytopathology 2003; 14:79-83 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.01097.x
  14. Veneti S, Daskalopoulou D, Zervoudis S, Papasotiriou E, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L. Liquid-based cytology in breast fine needle aspiration. Comparison with the conventional smear. Acta Cytol 2003;47:188-92 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326502
  15. Tisserand P, Fouquet C, Marck V, et al. ThinPrepprocessed fine-needle samples of breast are effective material for RNA- and DNA-based molecular diagnosis: application to p53 mutation analysis. Cancer 2003;99:223-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11258
  16. Pollett A, Bedard YC, Li SQ, Rohan T, Kandel R. Correlation of p53 mutations in ThinPrep-processed fine needle breast aspirates with surgically resected breast cancers. Mod Pathol 2000;13:1173-9 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880216
  17. Tabbara SO, Sidawy MK, Frost AR, et al. The stability of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression on breast carcinoma cells stored as PreservCyt suspensions and as ThinPrep slides. Cancer 1998;84:355-60 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981225)84:6<355::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-H
  18. Cochand-Priollet B, Prat JJ, Polivka M, et al. Thyroid fine needle aspiration: the morphological features on ThinPrep slide preparations. Eighty cases with histological control. Cytopathology 2003;14:343-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-5507.2003.00098.x