The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services (한국응급구조학회지)
- Volume 12 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.43-52
- /
- 2008
- /
- 1738-1606(pISSN)
- /
- 2384-2091(eISSN)
The Necessity of Education on Medical Oxygen Respiration First Aid
응급현장에서 산소 인공호흡법 교육의 필요성
- Kang, Yong-Su (Daejon Health Sciences College, Dept. of Emergency Medical Technology) ;
- Jo, Jean-Man (Daejon Health Sciences College, Dept. of Emergency Medical Technology) ;
- Lee, Tae-Yong (National Chungnam University, College of Medicine)
- Published : 2008.04.30
Abstract
I studied and analyzed current status about the necessity of Medical Oxygen Respiration First Aid when we perform first aid at emergency locations. As immediate and efficient first aid methods it is necessary to be able to use medical oxygen respiration equipments. I presented the basic data to develop and standardize education system on medical oxygen respiration first aid. Among those who were working at emergency locations in Korea from September 15th, 2005 to September 30th, 2005, I performed a survey on a professional group of 75 people and a non-professional group of 132 people. The results of the survey are summarized as follows. 1) There was difference between the professional group and the non-professional group on recognition about whether general public can perform medical oxygen respiration first aid(p<0.05). 2) On the necessity of medical oxygen respiration first aid, 93.2% of the total answered it is necessary and 6.8% answered it is unnecessary, so both groups thought it is very necessary(p>0.05). 3) On the importance of medical oxygen respiration first aid, 95.2% of the total answered it is important and 4.8% answered it is unimportant, so both groups thought it is very important(p>0.05). 4) On correspondence on necessity and importance of medical oxygen respiration first aid, there was a difference in thoughts between the professional group and the non-professional group(p<0.05). 5) On the necessity of education on medical oxygen respiration first aid, 98.1% of the total answered it is necessary and 1.9% answered it is unnecessary, so both groups thought it is very necessary(p>0.05).