Seismic Performance Evaluation of Flat Plate Structures Retrofitted with Steel Plates and Braces

강판과 가새로 보강된 무량판 구조물의 내진 성능평가

  • 신우승 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김진구 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2008.10.30

Abstract

In this study 3- and 6-story flat plate structures designed only for gravity load are retrofitted with steel plates and braces and their seismic performances are evaluated to verify the effect of seismic retrofit. According to the analysis results obtained from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses both the strength and stiffness are significantly enhanced as a result of the seismic retrofit. Especially the effect of column jacketing could be enhanced significantly when slabs were reinforced to prevent premature punching shear failure. When buckling-restrained braces are used instead of conventional braces, the structures showed more ductile behavior, especially in the 3-story structure.

본 논문에서는 중 약진 지역에서 중력 저항시스템인 중간 모멘트골조로 설계된 3층, 6층 RE 플랫플레이트 구조물을 KBC 2005를 만족하도록 RC구조물에 강판과 가새/ BRB 등의 보강방법을 적용하여 보강하고, 내진성능을 평가하여 보강 효과를 검증하였다. 비탄성 정적해석과 동적해석 결과에 따르면 내진 보강된 구조물은 강도와 강성이 크게 향상된 것으로 나타났다 특히 기둥을 철판으로 보강한 경우 슬래브를 철판으로 보강하여 조기 뚫림 전단파괴를 방지함으로써 강도를 크게 향상할 수 있다. BRB로 보강된 구조물은 Brace로 보강된 구조물보다 다소 연성적 거동을 보였으며, 그 효과는 3층 모델에서 현저하게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 송호범, 송진규 (2006) 철근콘크리트 무량판 구조시스템의 횡 저항 성능 평가, 한국지진공학회 학술대회 논문집, 10, pp.151-158
  2. 박영미, 한상환, 오승룡 (2006) 플랫 플레이트 슬래브 해석을 위한 강성감소계수, 대한건축학회 논문집, 22(11), pp.105-114
  3. 최정욱, 송진규, 윤정배, 이수곤 (2002) 횡하중을 받는 RC 무 량판 구조의 골조해석 모델, 대한건축학회 논문집, 18(3), pp.37-46
  4. 한상환, 유종혁 (2007) 포스트 텐션 플랫 플레이트 골조의 해석모델, 한국지진공학회 논문집, 11(6), pp.23-32 https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2007.11.6.023
  5. ACI Committe 318 (2005) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, American Concrete Institude, Detroit
  6. Elwood, K.J., Moehle, J.P. (2008) Dynamic collapse analysis for a reinforced concrete frame sustaining shear and axial failures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, online publish
  7. FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  8. Hueste, M.B.D., Wight, J.K. (1999) Nonlinear punching shear failure model for interior slab-column connection, Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(9), pp.997-1008 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:9(997)
  9. Korea Building Code (2005) Architectural Institute of Korea
  10. Luo, Y.H., Durrani, A.J. (1995) Equivalent beam model for flat-slab buildings - partI: interior connections, ACI Structural Journal, 92(1), pp.115-124
  11. Luo, Y.H., Durrani, A.J. (1995) Equivalent beam model for flat-slab buildings - partII: exterior connections, ACI Structural Journal, 92(2), pp.250-257
  12. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., Park, R. (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, 113(8), pp.1804-1826
  13. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L. (2006) Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation OpeenSees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California
  14. Somerville, P. Smith N., Puntamurthual, S., Sun, J. (1997) Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, Background document, Report No. SAC/BD-97/04
  15. Susantha, K.A.S., Ge, H., Usami, T. (2001) Uniaxial stress-strain relationship of concrete confined by various shaped steel tubes, Engineering Structures, 23(10), pp.1331-1347 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00020-7
  16. Vanderbilt, M.D., Corley, W.G. (1983) Frame analysis for concrete buildings, Concrete International : Design & Construction, 5(12), pp.33-43
  17. Vanmarcke, E.H., Gasparini, D.A. (1976) A program for artificial motion generation: User's manual and documentation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology