Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제50권1호
  • /
  • Pages.69-78
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

탈피대두박 급여가 흑돼지의 생산성, 도체 및 육질 특성에 미치는 영향

Effects of Feeding Dehulled Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality Parameters in Berkshire Pigs

  • 송영민 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 김회윤 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 신인수 (미국대두협회) ;
  • 이형석 (미국대두협회) ;
  • 이성대 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 정현정 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 박준철 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 문홍길 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 양돈과)
  • Song, Y.M. (Dept. of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Kim, H.Y. (Dept. of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Sin, I.S. (International Marketing TM, American Soybean Association) ;
  • Lee, H.S. (International Marketing TM, American Soybean Association) ;
  • Lee, S.D. (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Jung, H.J. (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Park, J.C. (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Moon, H.K. (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • 발행 : 2008.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

생시체중 25kg인 흑돼지 360두에 단백질 원료인 탈피대두박(DSBM)과 일반대두박(NDSBM)를 80kg까지 각각 급여하였다. 비육기에는 고에너지(ME 3.265kcal/kg)와 저에너지(ME 2,940 kcal/kg) 사료를 출하까지 급여하여 생산성, 도체 및 육질 특성을 분석하였다.생산형질에서 T1 처리구가 일당증체량에서 다른 처리구에 비하여 높았다(P<0.05). 사료요구율은 T1이 다른 처리구에 비하여 낮았다(P<0.05). 도체 특성에서, 도체율은 T2 처리구가 T1과 T4에 비하여 높았다(P<0.05), 등지방두께에서는 T2 처리구가 T1과 T3에 비하여 낮았다(P<0.05). 도체등급은 B이상 상위 등급출현 비율은 T2 처리구에서 높게 나타나는 경향이다. 육질특성에서 각 처리구에서 일반성분 함량은 유의차가 없었다. 보수력은 T4 처리구가 높은 경향을 나타내었고, 전단가는 T1 처리구에서 높은 경향을 나타내었다. 신선육의 육색은 L* 및 a*값은 T2 처리구가 높은 경향을 나타냈다. 지방색에서 L*값은 T1 처리구가 높은 경향을 나타냈다.이상의 결과를 보면, 일반대두박에 비하여 탈피 대두박은 흑돼지 생산성과 도체 특성을 개선시킬 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

A total of 360 Berkshire(hog) weighing 25kg were fed experimental diets containing either dehulled soybean meal(DSBM) or non-dehulled soybean meal(NDSBM) as a major protein source until they reach 80kg. The pigs were then fed the finisher diets either high(3,265 kcal/kg) or low(2,940 kcal/kg) in ME to evaluate the effects of dietary energy level for finisher phase on the growth performances, carcass and meat quality parameter. In growth performance, daily weight gain(kg/day) was higher(P<0.05) in T1 than in other groups. Feed conversion(feed/gain) was lower(P<0.05) in other groups. In carcass parameter, carcass percentage was higher(P<0.05) in T2 than in T1 and T4. Backfat thickness was lower(P<0.05) in T2 than in T1 and T3. The ratio of up B grade in carcass grade tender to be higher in T2 than in other groups. In meat quality, chemical composition was similar between groups. WHC was slighter higher in T1 than in other groups. Shear force was tender to be higher in T1 than in other groups. Hunter L and a in meat color were tender to be higher in T2 than in other groups. Hunter L in backfat color was thender to be higher in T1 than in other groups. The results indicate that growth performance and carcass parameter of Berkshire were improved by the dehulled soybean meal as comparison with non-dehulled soybean meal during growing and finishing periods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington. DC
  2. Bushman, D. H. and Lee, S. H. 1998. Dehulled soybean meal, non-fish meal diets and parametric formulation for increased profit with broilers. A draft paper obtained from ASA, Seoul
  3. Erickson, D. R. 1995. Practical handbook of soybean processing and utilization. Published jointly by AOCS press, Champaign, Illinois and United Soybean Board, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  4. Furuya, S. and Kaji, Y. 1991. Additivity of the apparent and true ileal digestibility amino acid supply in barley, maize, wheat or soya-bean meal based diets for growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32:321-331 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(91)90036-R
  5. Jhung, K. K., Lee, B. D. and Park, H. S. 1989. Effects of feeding dehulled soybean meal and full fat soybean on the performance and profitability of growing-finishing pigs. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 31:26-34
  6. Kang, Y. F., Li, D. F., Xing, J. J., Mckinnon, P. J. and Sun, D. Y. 2003. Effect of de-hulling on ileal amino acids digestibility of soybean meals fed to growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:928-938 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.928
  7. Kim, J. D., Tibbetts, S. M., Milley, J. E. and Lall, S. P. 2007. Effect of the incorporation level of dehulled soybean meal into test diet on apparent digestibility coefficients for protein and energy by juvenile haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus L. Aquacul. 267:308-314 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.02.052
  8. Lee, J. H., Han, In K., Ha, J. K., Kim, J. W. and Kim, I. B. 1994. The determination of amino acid digestibility of soybean meals in pigs. Kor. J. Anim. Nutr. Feed. 18:354-362
  9. Lim, S. R., Choi, S. M., Wang, X. J., Kim, K. W., Shin, I. S., Min, T. S. and Bai, S. C. 2004. Effects of dehulled soybean meal as a fish meal replacer in diets for fingerling and growing Korean rockfish Sebastes schlegeli. Aquacul. 231: 457-468 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.09.008
  10. Mcgoogan, B. B. and Gatlin III, D. M. 1997. Effects of replacing fish meal with soybean meal in diet for red drum Sciaenops ocellatus and potential for palatability Enhancement. J. World Aquac. Soc. 28:374-385 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1997.tb00284.x
  11. Park, H. S. and Lee, B. D. 1998. Economic evaluation of two imported soybean meals and two dietary protein levels for broilers. Kor. J. Poul. Sci. 25:91-98
  12. Park, Y. H., Kim, H. K., Kim, H. S., Lee, H. S., Shin, I. S. and Whang, K. Y. 2002. Effects of three different soybean meal sources on layer and broiler performance. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:254-265 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.254
  13. Rudolph, B. C., Boggs, L. S., Knabe, D. A., Tanksly, T. D. and Anderson, S. A. 1983. Digestibility of nitrogen and amino acid in soybean products for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 57:373- 386 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.572373x
  14. SAS. 1995. SAS/STAT User's Guide : Version 6, 11th edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
  15. Swick, R. A. 1998. US soybean meal: Present quality and future trends. ASA Technical Bulletin. MITA No. 096/11/97. AN14-1998. ASA. Singapore
  16. Swick, R. A. 1999. Economics of using dehulled soybean meal. Zootec. Inter. 22:38-44
  17. Tandsley, T. D. Jr., Knabe, D. A., Purser, K., Zebrowska, T. and Corley, J. R. 1981. Apparent digestibility of amino acid and nitrogen in three cottonseed meals and one soybean meal. J. Anim. Sci. 52:769-777 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.524769x
  18. Thacker, P. A., Sauer, W. C. and Jorgensen, H. 1984. Amino acid availability and urea recycling in finishing swine fed barley-based diets supplemented with soybean meal or sunflower meal. J. Anim. Sci. 59:409-415 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.592409x