DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Pig Breeds on Proximate, Physicochemical, Cholesterol, Amino Acid, Fatty Acid and Sensory Properties of Loins

돼지 품종이 등심의 일반성분, 물리화학적, 콜레스테롤, 아미노산, 지방산 조성 및 관능적 품질 특성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, I.S. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Jin, S.K. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Kim, C.W. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Song, Y.M. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Cho, K.K. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Chung, K.H. (Department of Animal Resource Technology, Jinju National University)
  • 김일석 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 진상근 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 김철욱 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 송영민 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 조광근 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 정기화 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과)
  • Published : 2008.02.01

Abstract

A total of 100 pigs were used to investigate the effects of pig breed on proximate, physicochemical, cholesterol, amino acid, fatty acid and sensory properties of loins. Crossbred pigs were alloted into one of five experimental groups [×Duroc(LYD), ×Berkshire (YBB), British Berkshire(BB), Kagoshima Berkshire(KB), Korean native black pig×Wild boars(KW; Sus coraanus)]. Pigs were slaughtered at 110 kg live weight. Moisture content was significantly(p<0.05) higher in KW than those of other pig breeds. Crude protein content was significantly(p<0.05) higher in YBB and KW than in LYD, BB, and KB. Cholesterol content was significantly(p<0.05) higher in YBB than those of other pig breeds. WHC and pH value had lower and shear force had higher(p<0.05) in YBB than those of other pig breeds. In color, LYD was significantly(p<0.05) higher in L* than those of other pig breeds. There was no significant different in a* and brittleness value among the breeds. In fatty acid and amino acid composition, KW had a higher(p<0.05) UFA/SFA, EFA/UFA ratio and EAA content but lower (p<0.05) SAAA. Total amino acid content was significantly(p<0.05) higher in LYD(20.44%) and BB (20.81%) than those of other pig breeds. In fresh meat, breeds affected meat color, drip loss, marbling score, and overall acceptability(p<0.05). Nevertheless, no significant differences were found among the breeds in the sensory parameters evaluated in the cooked meat, except for flavor

[Landrace×Yorkshire]×Duroc(LYD) 및 [Yorkshire×Berkshire]×Berkshire(YBB) 삼원교잡종과 흑색계 영국 Berkshire(BB; British berkshire), 가고시마 Berkshire(KB; Kagoshima Berkshire), [재래돼지×멧돼지(KNW; Native black pig×Wild boars)] 이원교잡종에서 생산된 돼지 100두를 생체중 110 kg 도달시 도축한 후 등심을 채취하여 분석하였다. 수분 함량은 KW, 조단백질은 YBB와 KW, 콜레스테롤 함량은 YBB가 다른 품종들보다 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.05). 다른 품종들에 비해 YBB는 보수력과 pH는 낮고, 전단가는 높았다(p<0.05). LYD에서 명도(L*)가 유의적으로 높게 나타났으며(p<0.05), 적색도(a*)와 파쇄성에서는 품종들 간에 유의적인 차이가 없었다(p>0.05). UFA/SFA와 EFA/UFA 비율과 EAA은 KW가 높게 나타났으나(p<0.05) SAAA는 유의적으로 낮았다(p<0.05). 총 아미노산 함량은 LYD와 BB가 각각 20.44%, 20.81%로 다른 품종에 비해 유의적으로 많았다(p<0.05). 신선육 상태에서 품종은 육색, 드립로스, 마블링과 전체적인 기호도에 영향을 미쳤지만(p<0.05), 조리육의 경우 풍미를 제외한 관능검사 항목에는 영향을 미치지 않았다(p>0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington. D. C. pp. 931-943
  2. Barton-Gade, P. A. 1988. The effect of breed on meat quality characteristics in pigs. In: Proc. 34th Int. Congr. Meat Sci. and Technol. Brisbane, Australia. pp. 568-570
  3. Bouton, P. E., Carrol, F. D., Fisher, A. L., Harris, P. V. and Shorthose, W. R. 1983. Influence of pH and fiber contraction state upon factors affecting the tenderness of bovine muscle. J. Food Sci. 38:404-410 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1973.tb01440.x
  4. Cameron, N. D., Warriss, P. D., Porter, S. J. and Enser. M. B. 1990. Comparison of Duroc and British Landrace pigs for meat and eating quality. Meat Sci. 27:227-237 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(90)90053-9
  5. Enfalt, A. C., Lundstrom, K., Hansson, I., Lundeheim, N. and Nystrom, P. E. 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed(Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Sci. 45(1): 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00101-5
  6. Fjelkner-Modig, S. and Persson, J. 1986. Carcass properties as related to sensory properties of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 63:102-108 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.631102x
  7. Folch, J., Lees, M. and Sloan-Stanley, G. N. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497-509
  8. Hamm, R. 1986. Muskelfarbstoff und Fleischfarbe. Fleischwirtschaft. 55(10):1415-1420
  9. Hammell, K. L., Laforest, J. P. and Dufour, J. J. 1993. Evaluation of the growth performance and carcass characteristics of commercial pigs pro- duced in Quebec. Can. J. Sci. 73:495-501 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas93-054
  10. Honikel, K. O., Kim, C. J. and Hamm, R. 1986. Sarcommere shortening of prerigor muscles and its influence on drip loss. Meat Sci. 16:267-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90038-0
  11. Jeremiah, L. E., Gibson, J. P., Gibson, L. L., Ball, R. O., Aker, C. and Fortin, A. 1999. The influence of breed, gender, and PSS(halothane) genotype on meat quality, cooking loss, and palatability of pork. Food Research International. 32:59-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00077-0
  12. Jin, S. K, Kim., C. W., Song, Y. M., Jang, W. H., Kim, Y. B., Yeo, J. S., Kim, J, W. and  Kang, K. H. 2001. Physicochemical characteristics of longissimus muscle between the Korean Native pig and landrace. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 21:142-148
  13. Jin, S. K., Kim, I. S., Hur, S. J., Kim, S. J. and Jeong, K. J. 2006. The influence of pig breeds on qualities of loin. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor.). 48:747-758 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2006.48.5.747
  14. Jin, S. K., Kim, I. S., Song, Y. M., Hur, S. J., Hah, J. H. and Hah, K. H. 2005. Effects of crossbreed method on meat quality in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor.). 47:457-464 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.3.457
  15. Kang, S. M. and Lee, S. K. 2007. Quality comparison of M. longissimus from crossbred wild boars, Korean native black pigs and modern genotype pigs during refrigerated storage. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor.). 49:257-268 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.2.257
  16. Kim, Y. B., Rho, J. H., Richardson, I. and Wood, J. 2000. Comparison of physicochemical properties of pork from 4 different pig breeds. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor). 42(2):195-202
  17. Lan, Y. H., McKeith, F. K., Novakofski, J. and Carr, T. R. 1993. Carcass and muscle characteristics of Yorkshire, Meishan, Yorkshire x Meishan, Meishan x Yorkshire, Fenjing x Yorkshire, and Minzhu x Yorkshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 3344-3353
  18. Langlois, L. and Minvielle, F. 1989. Comparisons of three-way and backcross swine : I. Growth performance and commercial assessment of the carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 67:2018-2025 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.6782018x
  19. Latorre, M. A., Lazaro, R., Valencia, D. G., Medel, P. and Mateos, G. G. 2004. The effects of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:526-533
  20. Lee, S. K., Ju, M., K., Kim, Y. S., Kang, S. M. and Choi, Y. S. 2005. Quality cpmparison between Korean native black bround pork and modern genotype ground pork during refrigerated storage. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 25:71-77
  21. Lundstrom, K., Essen-Gustavsson, B., Rundgren, M., Edfors-Lilja, I. and Malmfors, G. 1989. Effect of halothane genotype on muscle metabolism at slaughter and its relationship with meat quality: a within-litter comparison. Meat Sci. 25:251-262 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(89)90043-0
  22. McGloughlin, P., Allen, P., Tarrant, P. V., Joseph, R. L., Lynch, P. B. and Hanrahan, T. J. 1988. Growth and carcass quality of crossbred pigs sired by Duroc, Landrace and Large White boars. Livestock Production Sci. 18:275-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(88)90036-X
  23. Oliver, M. A., Gispert, M. and Diestre, A. 1993. The effects of breed and halothane sensitivity on pig meat quality. Meat Sci. 35:105-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90073-Q
  24. SAS. 1999. SAS user's Guide:Satistics, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
  25. Sather, A. P., Jones, S. D. M., Tong, A. K. W. and Murray, A. C. 1991. Halothane genotype by weight interactions on pig meat quality. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71(3):645-658 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-080
  26. Sellier, P. 1988. Meat quality in pig breeding and in crossbreeding. In: Proc. Int. Mtg. on Pig Carcass and Meat Quality. pp 145-148. Univ. di Bologna, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  27. Veith, U., von Lengerken, G. and Pfeiffer, H. 1979. Meat quality of hybrid swine in random sample tests. Hierzuckt. 33(12):556-562
  28. Yang, S. J., Kim, Y. K., Hyun, J. S., Moon, Y. H. and Jung, I. C. 2005. Amino acid contents and meat quality properties on the loin from crssbred black and crossbred pigs reared in Jejudo. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 25:7-12

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality between Duroc and Crossbred Pigs vol.34, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.2.238
  2. Influence of Duroc breed inclusion into Polish Landrace maternal line on pork meat quality traits vol.88, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620140679
  3. Physicochemical properties of M. longissimus dorsi of Korean native pigs vol.60, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0163-y