Energy Performance Evaluation of a New Commercial Building using Calibrated As-built Simulation with Monitoring Data

건물에너지 모니터링 및 시뮬레이션을 활용한 신축건물의 에너지성능평가

  • Song, Su-Won (Center for Sustainable Housing, Yonsei University)
  • 송수원 (연세대학교 친환경건축연구센터)
  • Published : 2008.03.10

Abstract

The performance evaluation of a new building is becoming more important because efficient design alone is often not sufficient to deliver an efficient building. However, there is a lack of standard evaluation methods to measure the energy performance of a new construction that has Energy Conservation Design Measures(ECDMs). This study presents an enhanced method based on calibrated whole-building simulation for evaluating the energy performance of new commercial buildings and demonstrates its use using a case-study building, including: an Energy Use Index(EUI) comparison with sub-metered data and an evaluation of the performance of specific ECDMs. The use of this method has determined that the case-study building was shown to use approximately 47% less energy than the base-case building that has the same shape and function as the case-study building(i.e., calibrated as-built simulation mode]), but doesn't include the simulated ECDMs.

Keywords

References

  1. IPMVP, 2001, International performance monitoring and verification protocol, Volume I: Concept and options for determining energy and water savings, Washington, United States Department of Energy
  2. IPMVP, 2003, International performance monitoring and verification protocol, Volume III: Concept and practices for determining energy savings in new construction, Washington, United States Department of Energy
  3. Torcellini, P., Judkoff, A. R. and Crawley, D. B., 2004, Lessons learned:High-performance buildings, ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. S4-S11
  4. Eley, C. and Tathagat. T., 1998, Energy Analysis Report:R. E. Johnson State Office Building, Texas State Energy Conservation Office, Austin, Texas
  5. Song, S., 2006, Development of new methodologies for evaluating the energy performance of new commercial buildings, Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
  6. Haberl, J. S. and Bou-Saada, T. E., 1998, Procedures for calibrating hourly simulation models to measured building energy and environmental data, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 193-204 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2888069
  7. Abushakra, B., Sreshthaputra, A., Haberl, J. S. and Claridge, D. E., 2001, Compliance of diversity factors and schedules for energy and cooling load calculations, Energy System Laboratory Report No. ESL-TR-01/04-01, College Station:Texas A&M University
  8. LBNL, 1993, DOE-2.1E supplement manual, Berkeley, CA:Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  9. Winkelmann, F. C., 1998, Underground surfaces: How to get a better underground surface heat transfer calculation in DOE-2.1e, Building Energy Simulation User News, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 17-25
  10. Kreider, J. and Haberl. J. S., 1994, Predicting hourly building energy usage:The great energy predictor shootout-overview and discussion of results. ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 1104-1118
  11. ASHRAE, 2002, ASHRAE Guideline14:Measurement of energy and demand savings, Atlanta, GA:American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers
  12. Song, S. and Haberl, J. S., 2007, A procedure for the performance evaluation of a new commercial building:Part I-Calibrated as-built simulation, ASHRAE Transactions (Accepted in Dec. 2007)
  13. Song, S. and Haberl, J. S., 2008, A procedure for the performance evaluation of a new commercial building:Part II-Overall Methodology and Comparison of Methods, ASHRAE Transactions (Accepted in Mar. 2008)