Biological Hydrogen Production from Mixed Waste of Food and Activated Sludge

음식물쓰레기와 폐활성슬러지의 혼합물로부터 혐기성 바이오 수소 생산

  • 정종민 (한국과학기술연구원 환경기술연구단) ;
  • 홍석원 (한국과학기술연구원 환경기술연구단) ;
  • 박철희 ((주)SK 기술원) ;
  • 김영오 (현대건설기술연구소 환경기술연구부) ;
  • 이상협 (한국과학기술연구원 환경기술연구단)
  • Received : 2008.08.18
  • Accepted : 2008.10.13
  • Published : 2008.10.15

Abstract

The influence of bacterial stress on anaerobic hydrogen-producing microorganisms was investigated in batch tests using serum bottles. Several physical and chemical stresses (i.e., heating, adding methane producing inhibitor and chemical acidification) were adapted as a pretreament of the seed sludge. In this experiment, the cultivation temperature were set at mesophilic ($35^{\circ}C$) and thermophilic conditions ($55^{\circ}C$) with adjusting pH at 5, 6, and 7 when using the mixture of food waste and activated sludge as a substrate. In conjunction with the pretreatment, hydrogen production was significantly enhanced as compared with that from untreated sludge. However, less biogas (hydrogen and methane) was produced without the pH control, resulted from the decrease of pH to below 4, mainly due to the formation of VFAs. Hydrogen and carbon dioxide gas were analyzed as main components of the biogas while methane not detected. With an application of chemical acidification, the highest hydrogen production value of 248 ml/l/day achieved at pH 7 and $35^{\circ}C$. In addition, more hydrogen gas produced when the ratio of butyric/acetic acid ratio increased. The optimum pH and temperature for hydrogen production were found to be 7 and $35^{\circ}C$, respectively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : (주) SK 에너지

References

  1. 환경부, (2007) 환경백서 2007
  2. APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.
  3. Momirlan, M, and T. Veziroglu. Recent directions of world hydrogen production. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 3:219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00017-3
  4. Cohen, A., B. Distel, A. Van Deursen, and J. G. Van Andel (1985) Role of anaerobic spore-forming bacteria in the acidogenesis of glucose-changes induced by discontinuous or low-rate feed supply, J. microbiol. 51, 179-192.
  5. Chen, C. C. and Lin, C. Y. (2003) Using sucrose as a substrate in an anaerobic hydrogen-producing reactor, Advances in Environmental Research, 7, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00035-7
  6. Das, D., Veziroglu, T. N. (2001) Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 26:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00058-6
  7. Fang, H. H. P and Liu, H. (2001) Effect of pH on hydrogen production from glucose by a mixed culture, Bioresource Technology, 82, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00110-9
  8. Fang, H. H. P., Liu, H. and Zhang, T. (2002) Characterization of a hyfrogen-producing granular sludge, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 78(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10174
  9. Fang, H. H. P., Member, A. and Yu., H. (2000) Effect of HRT on mesophilic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater, Journal of Environment Engineering, 126, 1145-1148.
  10. Han, S. J. and Shin, H. S. (2004) Biohydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of food waste, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.001
  11. Kapdan, I. K. and Kargi, F. (2006) Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38, 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.09.015
  12. Lay J.J. (2001) Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol and Bioengineering, 74, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.1118
  13. Leclerc, M. Bernalier, A., Donadille, G. and Lelait, M. (1997) H2/CO2 Metabolism in Acetogenic Bacteria Isolated From the Human Colon, Anaerobe, 3, 99. 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.1997.0117
  14. Lee, Y. J., Miyahara, T. and Noike, T. (2002) Effect of pH on microbial hydrogen fermentation, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 77, 694-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.623
  15. Levin D, Pitt L, Love M (2004) Biohydrogen production: prospectus and limitations to practical application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 29, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(03)00094-6
  16. Lin, C. Y. and Chang, R. C. (1999) Hydrogen production during the anaerobic acidogenic conversion of glucose, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 74, 498-500. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199906)74:6<498::AID-JCTB67>3.0.CO;2-D
  17. Owen, W. F. and Stuckey, D. C., Healy, J. B., Young, L. Y. and McCarty, P. L. (1979) Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research. 13, 485. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
  18. Sparling, R., D. Risbey and H. M. Poggi-Varakdo (1997) Hydrogen production from inhibited anaerobic composters, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 22, 563-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00137-1
  19. Tanisho, S., Kamiya, N. and Noriaki, K. (1898) Hydrogen evolution of Enterobacter aerogenes depending on culture pH, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 973, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80393-7