Bearing Properties of Domestic Larix Glulam

국내산 낙엽송집성재의 지압특성

  • Kim, Keon-Ho (Department of Wood Science & Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Il (Department of Wood Science & Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 김건호 (강원대학교 산림환경과학대학 임산공학과) ;
  • 홍순일 (강원대학교 산림환경과학대학 임산공학과)
  • Received : 2008.03.28
  • Accepted : 2008.05.08
  • Published : 2008.07.25

Abstract

Bearing strength test was investigated to determine the bearing properties of domestic larix glulam according to the load direction (in parallel to grain and in perpendicular to grain), the fastener (bolt and drift-pin), and the direction of laminae. The specimen was 5 ply glulam. The diameters of fastener are 12, 16 and 20 mm. The results were as follows. 1) In according to the diameter of bolt and drift-pin, the average of maximum bearing strength in parallel to grain loading was similar to that in perpendicular to grain loading. The average of maximum bearing strength was 1.50~2.31 times higher in parallel to grain loading than in perpendicular to grain loading. The average of maximum bearing strength in parallel to grain loading was lowered by 20% with increasing the diameter from 16 mm to 20 mm, but that in perpendicular to grain loading didn't show a clear tendency. 2) The average of bearing stiffness in parallel to grain loading was the highest at 16 mm in diameter. The average of bearing stiffness is similar to the shearing stiffness in drift-pin connection with increasing diameter. 3) In parallel to grain loading, the failure mode of specimens was the splitting along the grain in decreasing diameter. The failure mode in perpendicular to grain loading was the splitting along the grain. In this case, split occured more in specimens using bolt than in those using drift-pin. 4) The 5% offset yield strength in parallel to grain loading was similar to the predicted bearing strength of KBCS, NDS. In perpendicular to grain loading, the NDS's equation can be applied to predict the bearing strength.

하중방향(섬유평행방향, 섬유직각방향)과 접합구(볼트, 드리프트 핀) 적층면방향(평행, 수직)에 따른 국내산 낙엽송집성재의 지압강도시험을 실시하였다. 지압시편은 5 ply의 집성재를 사용하였고, 접합구의 직경은 12, 16, 20 mm를 사용하였다. 시험결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 볼트와 드리프트 핀의 각 직경에 따른 평균최대지압강도는 섬유평행하중방향의 경우 비슷한 경향을 보였으며, 섬유평행하중방향의 평균최대지압강도가 섬유직교방향보다 1.50~2.31배 높게 나타났다. 평균지압강도의 경우 섬유평행하중방향시편은 직경 16 mm에서 20 mm로 증가할 때 20% 감소하였으며, 섬유직교방향은 뚜렷한 경향이 없었다. 2) 평균지압초기강성의 경우 섬유평행하중방향은 직경 16 mm일 때 가장 크게 나타났다. 드리프트 핀 접합부의 전단강도실험 시 초기강성과 평균지압초기강성은 직경이 증가할수록 비슷한 경향을 보였다. 3) 지압강도시험 시 섬유평행방향시편의 파괴형상은 직경이 작을수록 할렬파단을 보였다. 섬유직교방향의 시편은 대부분이 섬유평행방향으로 할렬파단이 일어났으며 볼트가 드리프트 핀 시편보다 더 많이 나타났다. 4) 지압강도예측식을 통해 구한 예측지압강도와 실제 5% 유사항복지압강도를 비교하였을 경우 섬유평행방향은 KBCS, NDS의 예측지압강도와 비슷하게 나타났으나, 섬유직교방향은 NDS에서 제안한 예측식이 잘 적용되는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김건호, 홍순일. 2008. 낙엽송집성재의 bolt, drift pin 접합부의 전단강도 성능 평가. 목재공학. 36(1): 69-78.
  2. 건축구조 설계기준. 2005. 대한건축학회.
  3. America Society of Civil Engineer. 1997. National Design and Specification for Timber Construction of U.S. ASCE. New York.
  4. Eurocode 5. 1995. Design of timber structures European pre-standard ENV 1995-1-1: general rules and rules for building, CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  5. Hirai T. 1989. Basic properties of mechanical wood-joints properties of wood under a bolt. Res. bull. The College Experiment Forest, Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, 46(4):967-988
  6. Johansen, K. W. 1949. Theory of timber connections. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. 9: 249-262.
  7. Korea Standard Association. 2002. KS F 2156. Method of dowel-bearing strength test for wood and wood-based products.
  8. Hwang. K. and K. Komatsu. 2002. Bearing properties of engineered wood products I : effects of dowel diameter and loading direction. J wood Sci. 48: 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00831350
  9. Kawamoto N, K. Komatsu and M. Harada. 1993. Lateral strengths of drift-pin in perpendicular to the grain loadings 3:estimation of yield loads by european yield theory (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 39:1386-1392.
  10. NFPA 1986. National design specification. National Forest Product Association, 1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
  11. Rammer, D. R. and S. G. Winistorfer, 2001. Effect of Moisture Content on Dowel-Bearing Strength. Wood and Fiber Science. 33(1): 126-139.
  12. Soltis, L. A., S. Karnasudirdja, and J. K. Little, 1987. Angle to grain strength of dowel-type fasteners. Wood and Fiber Science. 19(1): 68-80.
  13. Takuro H. 1984. Effect of loading direction on the bearing characteristics of wood under a bolt. 木材學會誌. 30(12): 959-964.
  14. Whale LRS and I. Smith. 1986. The derivation of design values for nailed and bolted joints in EUROCODE 5. Working Commission 18, Timber Struct., Meeting 19. Int. Council for Build. Research Studies and Documentation.
  15. Wilkinson T. L. 1991. Dowel bearing strength. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-505 Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Product Laboratory.