DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improved Broiler Chick Performance by Dietary Supplementation of Organic Zinc Sources

  • Jahanian, Rahman (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Moghaddam, Hasan Nassiri (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Rezaei, Abbas (Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2007.10.13
  • 심사 : 2008.05.13
  • 발행 : 2008.09.01

초록

Two inorganic (zinc sulfate and zinc oxide) and three organic (zinc acetate, zinc-methionine, and zinc-lysine) zinc sources were evaluated for their effects on the performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. The birds were randomly assigned to one control (non-supplemented) and 15 treatment (supplemented) groups consisting of four replicates of 10 chicks each in a $5{\times}3$ factorial arrangement of treatments (five zinc sources and three supplemental zinc levels). Birds were kept in floor pens in a temperature-controlled room from 1 to 42 d of age and fed a non-supplemented basal diet (control) or the basal diet supplemented with 40, 80 or 120 mg/kg of Zn as mentioned sources. Dietary zinc source had considerable effect on feed intake in all experimental periods. Increasing Zn level from 80 to 120 mg/kg decreased the average feed intake in the growth stage (p<0.01) and also in the entire experimental period (p<0.001). Similarly, the average daily gain during the entire trial period was affected by the type of Zn source (p<0.001) and supplemental level (p<0.01). One degree of freedom contrast comparisons showed that the inclusion of organic zinc sources into the diets caused significant increases in feed intake and body gain when compared with inorganic counterparts. Except in wk 1, dietary supplementation with organic sources improved (p<0.05) feed conversion ratio; FCR values were not affected by dietary Zn source or supplementation level. Breast meat yield increased with supplemental levels of organic Zn sources; however, other carcass parameters were not affected by dietary Zn source. On the other hand, organic versus inorganic zinc supplementation caused a significant increase in liver, breast and carcass weight percentages. The present findings suggest that supplemental levels of organic Zn compounds had beneficial effects on broiler performance, and Zn requirements can be reduced using these feed supplements in poultry rations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anonymous. 1982. Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Nor Walk, CT.
  2. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
  3. Baker, D. H. and C. B. Ammerman. 1997. Zinc bioavailability. In: Bioavailability of nutrients for animals: amino acids, minerals, and vitamins (Ed. C. B. Ammerman, D. H. Baker and A. J. Lewis). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 367-398
  4. Batal, A. B., T. M. Parr and D. H. Baker. 2001. Zinc bioavailability in tetrabasic zinc chloride and the dietary zinc requirement of young chicks fed soy concentrate diet. Poult. Sci. 80:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.87
  5. Cao, J., P. R. Henry, S. R. Davis, R. J. Cousins, R. D. Miles, R. C. Littell and C. B. Ammerman. 2002. Relative bioavailability of organic zinc sources based on tissue zinc and metallothionein in chicks fed conventional dietary zinc concentrations. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 101:161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00051-2
  6. Cheng, J., E. T. Komegay and T. Schell. 1998. Influence of dietary lysine on the utilization of zinc from zinc sulfate and a zinclysine complex by young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1064-1074. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7641064x
  7. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  8. Edwards, Jr., H. M. 1959. The availability of chicks to zinc in various compounds and ores. J. Nutr. 69:306-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/69.3.306
  9. Edwards, Jr., H. M. and D. H. Baker. 1999. Bioavailability of zinc in several sources of zinc oxide, zinc sulfate, and zinc metal. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2730-2735. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77102730x
  10. Ellis, R., E. R. Morris and A. D. Hill. 1982. Bioavailability to rats of iron and zinc in calcium-iron-phytate and calcium-zincphytate complex. Nutr. Res. 2:319-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(82)80013-4
  11. Falchuk, K. H. and B. L. Vallee. 1985. Zinc and chromatin structure, composition and function. In: Trace elements in man and animals (Ed. C. F. Mills, I. Bremner and J. K. Chesters). CAB Publishing, UK, pp. 48-55.
  12. Fordyce, E. J., R. M. Forbes, K. R. Robbins and J. W. Erdman, Jr. 1987. Phytate${times}$calcium/zinc molar ratios: Are they predictive of zinc bioavailability? J. Food Sci. 52:421-428.
  13. Hahn, J. D. and D. H. Baker. 1993. Growth and plasma zinc responses of young pigs fed pharmacologic levels of zinc. J. Anim. Sci. 71:3020-3024. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71113020x
  14. Hempe, J. M. and R. J. Cousins. 1989. Effect of EDTA and zincmethionine complex on zinc absorption by rat intestine. J. Nutr. 119:1179-1187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/119.8.1179
  15. Hill, D. A., E. R. Peo, Jr., A. J. Lewis and J. D. Crenshaw. 1986. Zinc-amino acid complexes for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 121-130. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.631121x
  16. Kaim, W. and B. Schwederski. 1994. Bioinorganic chemistry: inorganic elements in the chemistry of life. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, England. pp. 401
  17. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
  18. Oberleas, D., M. E. Muhrer and B. L. O'Dell. 1962. Effects of phytic acid on zinc availability and parakeratosis in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 21:57-61. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.21157x
  19. O'Dell, B. L., J. M. Yohe and J. E. Savage. 1964. Zinc availability in the chick as affected by phytate, calcium and ethylenediamine tetraacetate. Poult. Sci. 43:415-419. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0430415
  20. Puchala, R., S. G. Pierzynowski, T. Sahlu and S. P. Hart. 1995. Effects of amino acids administered to a perfused area of the skin in Angora goats. J. Anim. Sci. 73:565-570. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.732565x
  21. Puchala, R., T. Sahlu and J. J. Davis. 1999. Effects of zincmethionine on performance of Angora goats. Small Ruminant Res. 33: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(98)00194-1
  22. Reis, P. J. 1989. The influence of absorbed nutrients on wool growth. In: The biology of wool and hair (Ed. G. E. Rogers, P. J. Reis, K. A. Ward and R. C. Marshall). Chapman and Hall Publishing, London, UK, pp. 185-203.
  23. Reis, P. J. and T. Sahlu. 1994. The nutritional control of growth and properties of mohair and wool fibres: a comparative review. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1899-1906. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7271899x
  24. Roberson, R. H. and P. J. Schaible. 1960. The availability to the chicks of zinc as the sulfate, oxide or carbonate. Poult. Sci. 39:835-837. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0390835
  25. Sahin, K., M. O. Smith, M. Onderci, N. Sahin, M. F. Garsu and O. Kucuk. 2005. Supplementation of zinc from organic and inorganic source improves performance and antioxidant status of heat-stressed quail. Poult. Sci. 84:882-887. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.882
  26. Sandoval, M., P. R. Henry, C. B. Ammerman, R. D. Miles and R. C. Littell. 1997. Relative bioavailability of supplemental inorganic zinc sources for chicks. J. Anim. Sci. 75:3195-3205. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.75123195x
  27. Sandoval, M., P. R. Henry, R. C. Littell, R. D. Miles, G. D. Butcher and C. B. Ammerman. 1999. Effect of dietary zinc source and method of oral administration on performance and tissue trace mineral concentration of broiler chicks. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 1788-1799. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7771788x
  28. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS Statistics User's Guide. Statistical Analytical System. 5th rev. ed. Carry, NC, SAS Institute Inc.
  29. Spears, J. W. 1989. Zinc methionine for ruminants: Relative bioavailability of zinc in lambs and effects of growth and performance of growing heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 67:835-843. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.673835x
  30. Swinkels, J. W. G. M., E. T. Kornegay, K. E. Webb, Jr. and M. D. Lindemann. 1991. Comparison of inorganic and organic zinc chelate in zinc depleted and repleted pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 69 (Suppl. 1):358 (Abstr.). https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.691358x
  31. Wedekind, K. J. and D. H. Baker. 1990. Zinc bioavailability in feed-grade sources of zinc. J. Anim. Sci. 68:684-689. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683684x
  32. Wedekind, K. J., A. E. Hortin and D. H. Baker. 1992. Methodology for assessing zinc bioavailability: Efficacy estimates for zinc-methionine, zinc sulfate, and zinc oxide. J. Anim. Sci. 70:178-187. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.701178x

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of copper, iron, zinc, and manganese supplementation in a corn and soybean meal diet on the growth performance, meat quality, and immune responses of broiler chickens vol.20, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00204
  2. Effects of diets supplemented with zinc and manganese on performance and related parameters in laying hens‡ vol.83, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00976.x
  3. Effects of different levels of dietary crude protein and threonine on performance, humoral immune responses and intestinal morphology of broiler chicks vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2014000100005
  4. Effects of dietary substitution of zinc-methionine for inorganic zinc sources on growth performance, tissue zinc accumulation and some blood parameters in broiler chicks vol.99, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12213
  5. Effects of dietary inclusion of silymarin on performance, intestinal morphology and ileal bacterial count in aflatoxin-challenged broiler chicks vol.101, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12556
  6. Organic or inorganic zinc in poultry nutrition: a review vol.73, pp.04, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000769
  7. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic zinc on laying performance, egg quality and some biochemical parameters of laying hens pp.09312439, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12793
  8. Marginal deficiencies of dietary arginine and methionine could suppress growth performance and immunological responses in broiler chickens pp.09312439, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12695
  9. Bioactive Compounds in Functional Meat Products vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020307
  10. Effects of dietary supplementation of choline and carnitine on growth performance, meat oxidative stability and carcass composition of broiler chickens fed diets with different metabolisable energy levels vol.59, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1476677
  11. Immunological Responses of Broiler Chicks Can Be Modulated by Dietary Supplementation of Zinc-methionine in Place of Inorganic Zinc Sources vol.22, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80473
  12. The effect of prebiotic and organic zinc alone and in combination in broiler diets on the performance and some blood parameters vol.11, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2012.e55
  13. Scientific Opinion on the potential reduction of the currently authorised maximum zinc content in complete feed vol.12, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3668
  14. Effects of different levels of zinc-glycine and zinc hydroxide on the performance, carcass quality, immunity and duodenum morphometric of the broiler chickens vol.20, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.1953408
  15. Broiler welfare is preserved by long-term low-dose oral exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles: preliminary study vol.15, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2021.1905099
  16. Comparison of Zinc Sulfate and Zinc Threonine Based on Zn Bioavailability and Performance of Broiler Chicks vol.199, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02354-x
  17. Comparative effect of potentiated zinc oxide and antibiotic growth promoters on intestinal morphometry and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens vol.54, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-03012-7