Foraging Behavior in Beauty Goby, Pterogobius zacalles: Relationship between Foraging Modes and Prey Size

다섯동갈망둑, Pterogobius zacalles의 채식행동: 채식방법과 먹이생물 크기의 관계에 관하여

  • Received : 2008.04.15
  • Accepted : 2008.06.17
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

The foraging behavior of the beauty goby, Pterogobius zacalles, was studied at Mutu Bay, Aomori province, Japan. P. zacalles harvested invertebrates prey from benthic substrates by using two distinct foraging modes: picking substrate among boulders and sucking surface of boulder. Among others, picking substrate among boulders was primarily used foraging mode. The foraging modes of P. zacalles were followed by three stages: searching for prey, feeding and chewing. For foraging, it takes less time to suck out the surface of boulder than pick up substrate among boulders, because the resting site of P. zacalles is close to the place where they do sucking. The diets of P. zacalles primarily consisted of benthic amphipods regardless of their foraging modes. Only the difference was that they can get bigger amphipods when they did picking rather than sucking. Even though it needs more time and energy to do picking, P. zacalles was compensated by getting a high-calorie diet eventually, therefore prey size can be the determinant of their foraging modes.

2000년 10월부터 11월까지 일본 Aomori현 Mutu만에서 다섯동갈망둑, Pterogobius zacalles의 섭식행동에 관하여 연구를 실시하였다. 다섯동갈망둑은 돌 틈에서 펄과 함께 먹이를 채식하는 쪼기와 돌 표면에서 먹이생물을 흡입하는 두 가지 유형의 채식방법이 있지만, 주로 돌 틈에서 먹이를 채식하는 방법을 이용한다. 다섯동갈망둑의 두 가지 채식방법 모두는 먹이를 찾아 유영하는 찾기, 섭식장소에서 먹이생물을 발견하고 먹는 섭식, 섭식한 후에 먹이를 씹고 이물질을 뱉어내는 씹기의 3단계로 구성된다. 다섯동갈망둑은 두 가지 채식방법 중에서 돌 틈에서 섭식하는 쪼기를 이용할 때 더 먼 거리를 유영하여 먹이를 찾으며, 긴 시간동안 먹이를 씹는다. 다섯동갈망둑은 채식방법에 상관없이 단각류가 주요 먹이생물이지만, 돌 표면에서 채식하였을 때보다 돌 틈에서 채식하였을 때 상대적으로 크기가 큰 단각류나 십각류를 섭식한다. 이들은 돌 틈에서 먹이를 섭식할 때 더 많은 에너지와 시간을 소비하지만, 높은 칼로리의 먹이를 섭식한다. 따라서 먹이생물의 크기는 이들의 섭식방법을 결정하는 요인으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김익수.최 윤.이충렬.이용주.김병직.김지현. 2005. 한국원 색어류대도감. 교학사, 서울, 613pp
  2. 허성회.곽석남. 1998. 광양만 잘피밭에 서식하는 줄망둑(Acentrogobius pflaumi)의 식성. 한국어류학회지, 10: 24-31
  3. 허성회.곽석남. 1999. 광양만 잘피밭에 서식하는 문절망둑 (Acanthogobius flavimanus)의 식성. 한국수산학회지, 32: 10-17
  4. Aarino, K. and E. Bonsdorff. 1993. Seasonal variation in abundance and diet of the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus (Pallas) in a northern Baltic archipelago. Ophelia, 37: 19-30
  5. Behrents K.C. 1989. The foraging ecology of two sympatric gobiid fishes: importance of behavior in prey type selection. Environ. Biol. Fish., 26: 105-118 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001027
  6. Choi, S.H. 2003. A study on foraging behavior of four species in the genus Pterogobius (Pisces; Gobiidae), with note on speciation. Ph. D. dissertation, Hiroshima University, 155pp
  7. Cooper, S.D., D.W. Smith and D.W.Jr. Bence. 1985. Prey selection by fresh water predators with different foraging strategies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42: 1720-1732 https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-216
  8. Costello, M.J., J. Edwards and G.W. Potts. 1990. The diet of the two-spot goby, Gobiusculus flavescens (Pisces). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 70: 329-342 https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531540003544X
  9. Croy, M.I. and R.N. Hughes. 1991. Effects of food supply, hunger, danger and competition on choice of foraging location by the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Anim. Behav., 42: 131-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80613-X
  10. Dill, L.M. 1983. Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behaviour of fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 40: 398-408 https://doi.org/10.1139/f83-058
  11. Ellis, T. and R.N. Gibson. 1997. Predation of 0-group flatfishes by 0-group cod: handling times and size-selection. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 149: 83-90 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps149083
  12. Ellison, J.P., C. Terry and Jr. J.S. Stephens. 1979. Food resource utilization among five species of Embiotocids at King Harber, California, with preliminary estimates of caloric intake. Mar. Biol., 52: 161-169 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390424
  13. Fausch, K.D. 1993. Experimental analysis of microhabitat selection by juvenile steelhea (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (O. Kisutch) in a British Columbia stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50: 1198-1207 https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-136
  14. Fausch, K.D., S. Nakano and S. Kitano. 1997. Experimentally induced foraging mode shift by sympatric charrs in a mountain stream. Behav. Ecol., 8: 414-420 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/8.4.414
  15. Grant, J.W.A. and D.L.G. Noakes. 1987. Movers and stayers: Foraging tactics of Young-of-the-year Brook Charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. J. Anim. Ecol., 56: 1001-1013 https://doi.org/10.2307/4962
  16. Grantner, A. and M. Taborsky. 1998. The metabolic rates associated with resting, and with the performance of agonistic, submissive and digging behaviours in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). J. Comp. Physiol. B, 168: 427-433 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003600050162
  17. Griffiths, D. 1980. Foraging costs and relative prey size. Am. Nat., 116: 743-752 https://doi.org/10.1086/283666
  18. Grossman, G.D., R. Coffin and P.B. Moyle. 1980. Feeding ecology of the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae). Effects of behavioral, ontogenetic, and temporal variation on diet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 44: 47-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(80)90100-8
  19. Hoyle, J.A. and A. Keast. 1987. The effect of prey morphology and size on handling time in a piscivore, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Can. J. Zool., 65: 1972-1977 https://doi.org/10.1139/z87-300
  20. Hoyle, J.A. and A. Keast. 1988. Prey handing time in two piscivores, Esox americanus vermiculatus and Micropterus salmoides, with contrasting mouth morphologies. Can. J. Zool., 66: 540-542 https://doi.org/10.1139/z88-079
  21. Humphries, P. and I.C. Potter. 1993. Relationship between the habitat and diet of three species of atherinids and three species of gobies in a temperate Australian estuary. Mar. Biol., 116: 193-204 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350009
  22. Katano, O. 1996. Foraging tactics and home range of dark chub in a Japanese river. Oecologia, 106: 199-205 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328599
  23. Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies. 1997. Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. 4th ed. Blackwell Science, Inc., 456pp
  24. Killen, S.S., J.A. Brown and A.K. Gamperl. 2007. The effect of prey density on foraging mode selection in juvenile lumpfish: balancing food intake with the metabolic cost of foraging. J. Anim. Ecol., 76: 814-825 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01237.x
  25. Magnhagen, C. and A.M. Wiederholm. 1982. Habitat and food preferences of Pomatoschistus minutus and P. microps (Gobiidae) when alone and together: an experimental study. Oikos, 39: 152-156 https://doi.org/10.2307/3544479
  26. Masuda, H., K. Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno and T. Yoshino. 1984. The fishes of the Japanese archipelago. Tokai Univ Press, Text: i-xxii+1-437, Atlas: pls. 1-370
  27. Nakano, S., K.D. Fausch and S. Kitnao. 1999. Flexible niche partitioning via a foraging mode shift: A proposed mechanism for coexistence in stream-dwelling charrs. J. Anim. Ecol., 68: 1079-1092 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00355.x
  28. Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of the world, 4th ed. John wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 601pp
  29. Nielsen, J.L. 1992. Microhabitat-specific foraging behavior, diet, and growth of Juvenile coho salmon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 121: 617-634 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1992)121<0617:MFBDAG>2.3.CO;2
  30. Onadeko, C.A. 1992. The food and feeding habits of the sleeper goby, Batanga lebretonis (Steindachner) (Pisces: Teolestei: Eleotrididae) in the Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. J. Afr. Zool., 106: 176-189
  31. Osugi, T., Y. Yanagisawa and N. Mizuno. 1998. Feeding of a benthic goby in a river where nektonic fishes are absent. Environ. Biol. Fish., 52: 331-343 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007377116976
  32. Okuda, N. and Y. Yanagisawa. 1996. Filial cannibalism by mouthbrooding males of the cardinal fish, Apogon doederleini, in relaition to their physical condition. Environ. Biol. Fish., 45: 397-404 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002532
  33. Pyke, G.H. 1984. Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15: 523-575 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515
  34. Russell, J.S. and S.J. Holbrook. 1984. Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia, 63: 6-12 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379778
  35. Shiogaki, M. 1981. Life history of the gobiid fish Pterogobius zacalles. Japan. J. Ichthyol., 28: 70-79
  36. Stephens, D.W., J.S. Brown and R.C. Ydenberg. 2007. Foraging: behavior and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 608pp
  37. Swenson, R.O. and A.T. McCray. 1996. Feeding ecology of the tidewater goby. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 125: 956-970 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0956:FEOTTG>2.3.CO;2