Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Influence of Finishing and Polishing Methods on the Gap between Denture Base Resin and Soft Liner

의치의 마무리와 연마법이 의치상 레진과 연성 이장재 간의 공극에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Jung, Seung-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 정승환 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이준석 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Received : 2008.10.08
  • Accepted : 2008.12.25
  • Published : 2008.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The junction between resilient denture liner and the denture base is difficult to finish and polish due to difference of the physical property of the materials. Gaps tend to be formed during finishing and polishing procedures. The purpose of this study was measuring the width of junctional gap between $Molloplast-B^{(R)}$ and denture base material after finishing and polishing procedure, and evaluating the effect of method and direction on gap width. $Molloplast-B^{(R)}$ was processed (according to the manufacturer's instruction) against Lucitone $199^{(R)}$ acrylic resin. 50 specimens were fabricated with a raised center section. All of specimens were examined and photographed with a stereoscopic microscope(x120), and the largest gap along the junction of $Molloplast-B^{(R)}$ and acrylic resin on each specimen was measured. One-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and independent t-test at 95% confidence level were used to analyze the data and to compare groups. The results of this study were as follows. In comparison with finishing tools, the gap width was the largest in $Molloplast^{(R)}$-Cutter and the smallest in FSQ-cross cut bur. There was statistically significant difference between FSQ-cross cut bur and $Molloplast^{(R)}$-Cutter(p<0.05). There was no significant difference in gap width between the direction of polishing. The mean value of gap width was the smallest in case of no polishing, and the largest in case of polishing with pumice & tin oxide. There was statistically significant difference between pumice and pumice & tin oxide. From the results, it is concluded that the use of $Molloplast^{(R)}$-Cutter in clinic need serious consideration even though it has good cutting ability. Further careful study is needed for finishing and polishing methods for decreasing gap width in junction of two materials.

연성 이장재를 의치에 적용했을 때, 의치 변연부에서 나타나는 공극에 의한 문제점을 많이 경험하게 된다. 그래서 변연 공극을 최대한 줄일 수 있는 방법을 연구하여야 하고 특히 최종 과정인 마무리와 연마시의 변연 공극의 양상에 대한 평가가 이루어져야 한다. 본 연구에서는 실리콘 계열의 연성 이장재인 $Molloplast-B^{(R)}$를 적용하였을 때, 의치와 연성 의치 이장재의 접합부에서 나타나는 공극의 양을 측정하고 연마 방법, 연마 방향이 변연 공극에 미치는 영향에 대하여 알아보고자 하였다. 마무리 방법과 연마 방법, 방향에 따라 군 분류를 하였고, 시편의 일관성과 정확성을 위해 금속 틀을 방전 가공하여 제작하였고, 제조사의 지시에 따라 총 50개의 시편을 제작하였다. 공극의 양은 120배 확대의 입체 광학 현미경상에서 가장 큰 값을 가지는 부위를 측정하였고, 모든 측정치는 통계적 분석, 평가 하였다. 실험 결과, 각 분류에 따른 공극을 비교 했을 때, $Molloplast^{(R)}$-Cutter로 마무리 한 후 pumice와 tin oxide를 순행하여 연마를 한 경우가 가장 크게 나타났고, FSQ-cross cut bur를 이용하여 마무리만 한 것이 가장 적게 나타났다. 또한 연마를 할수록 공극의 양이 증가되는 양상을 나타내었다. 방향에 따라서는 통계적 유의성은 나타나지 않았으나 레진에서 연성 이장재 방향으로 시행하였을 때가 더 적은 값을 나타내는 경향을 보였다. 이상의 결과로 보아 삭제력이 우수한 버일수록 레진과 연성 이장재의 접합부에서 나타나는 공극이 커짐을 알 수 있었고, 또한 연마를 시행 할수록 공극의 양이 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내었다. 접합부에서의 공극을 줄일 수 있는 마무리와 연마 방법에 대한 더 많은 연구가 이루어져야 하고 부가적으로 최종 연마가 끝나고 공극을 막아 줄 수 있는 재료에 대한 연구가 필요한 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 단국대학교

References

  1. Craig RG, editor. Restorative dental materials. 10th ed. St Louis. Mosby 1997. p.532-7
  2. Causton BE. Denture base polymers and liners. In O'Brian WJ, editor. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed. Chicago. Quintessence 1997. p. 90-2
  3. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia. WB Saunders 1996:264-6
  4. Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:114-9
  5. Amin WM, Fletcher AM., Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethylmethacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90007-5
  6. Kutay O. Bond strength of Molloplast-B soft denture liner to acrylic resin and metal denture base materials. [Dr Med Dent Thesis], Istanbul, Univ of Istanbul, 1989:73-8
  7. Wright PS. Characterization of the adhesion of soft lining materials to polymethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 1982;61:1002-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610080101
  8. Sarac D. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:143-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.012
  9. Loney RW, Moulding MB. The effect of finishing and polishing on surface roughness of a processed resilient denture liner. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6: 390-6
  10. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Hacker CH, Ritsco RG. Finishing and polishing of a poly(fluoroalkoxyphosphazene) resilient denture liner. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:362-7
  11. Pesun IJ, James Hodges, Juey H. Lai. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the gap width between a denture base resin and two long-term, resilient denture liners J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:311-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.122162
  12. Horton CB, Paulus HM, Pelleu GB, Rudolph JJ. An evaluation of commercial pastes for finishing composite resin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37: 674-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90218-9
  13. Jepson NJ McCabe JF, Storer R. Evaluation of the viscoelastic properties of denture soft lining materials. J Dent 1993;21:163-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90027-N
  14. Radford DR, Watson TF, Walter JD, Challacombe SJ. The effects of surface machining on heat polymerized acrylic resin and two soft denture base materials: a scanning electron microscope and confocal microscope evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:200-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70126-4
  15. Scheffé H. Using the 3-way interaction as the error term. In The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley 1959. p. 98-107
  16. Mattew, E. Soft resin lining for dentures. Br. Dent. J 1945;78:140
  17. Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthetic dentistry: a review. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:477-83
  18. Masella RP, Dolan CT, Laney WR. The prevention of the growth of Candida on Silastic 390 soft liner for dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:250-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80081-3
  19. Pinto JRR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP. Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:288-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.005