Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Accuracy of Implant Torque Controllers

수종의 임플란트 토크 조절기의 정확성 비교

  • Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • 김대곤 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2008.01.25
  • Accepted : 2008.06.25
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Tightening of the screws in implant restorations should be accurate and precise. If applied torque is too low, screw loosening would be occurred. With too high torque, the screw fracture might take place. Various torque generating devices are developed and employed to apply a proper torque. The purpose of this investigation was to determine and compare the accuracy of the torque controllers. In this study, 4 types of torque controllers were used; electronic torque controller, torque limiting device, torque indicating device and contra angle torque driver. Digital torque gauge was employed to measure the de-torque value. Thirty cycles of tightening and loosening were done with each torque controller. All implant torque controllers have shown slight errors and deviations. The torque liming device exhibited the most accurate data. No significant difference was found among the mean de-torque values of the electronic torque controller, torque indicating device and contra angle torque driver. In the limitation of this study, it would be recommended that the implant torque controllers should be checked whether uniformed and precise torque can be generated and a measuring error should be corrected.

네 종류의 토크 조절기(전자 토크 조절기($Br{\aa}nemark$), 토크 최대값 제한 장치(Pentaborn), 토크 표시 장치(ITI), 콘트라앵글 토크장치(Anthogyr))를 이용하여 나사의 조임 및 풀림 토크값을 측정하여 적정 토크 값과 토크 조절기를 통해 적용되는 실제 토크값에 대한 차를을 측정하여 토크 조절기의 정확도를 비교, 분석하였다. 풀림토크의 평균값 및 최대값과 최소값을 살펴 본 결과 Pentaborn과 같은 토크 최대값 제한 장치의 정확도가 다른 세 종류의 토크 조절기에 비해 우수한 것으로 나타났으며 15회 정도의 조임과 풀림은 큰 영향을 미치지 않지만 그 이상의 조임과 풀림은 정확한 토크 조절에 나쁜 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었다. 그러므로 토크 조절기가 일정하고 정확한 토크값을 반복적으로 유지하는지 확인 및 교정하면서 임상적으로 적용해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry
  2. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(3):270-6
  3. Priest G. Single-tooth implants and their role in preserving remaining teeth: a 10-year survival study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(2):181-8
  4. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(2):119-30 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
  5. Khraisat A, Hashimoto A, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(4):326-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.001
  6. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Nelson EW, Tietge JD. Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6(5):435-9
  7. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Comparison of "look-alike" implant prosthetic retaining screws. J Prosthodont 1995;4(1):23-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00310.x
  8. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 ;7(1):26-33
  9. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(5):421-33
  10. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4(3):241-7
  11. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent 1994 ;3(1):17-21 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199404000-00002
  12. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(5):529-36
  13. Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29(5):242-5 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0242:ISMATS>2.3.CO;2
  14. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. Marcel Dekker, New York 1995;515-64
  15. Binon PP. The external hexagonal interface and screw-joint stability: A primer on threaded fasteners in implant dentistry. Quint Dent Tech 2000;23: 91-104
  16. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42(1): 71-89
  17. Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(3):353-9
  18. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent 1994 ;3(1):17-21 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199404000-00002
  19. Dellinges M, Curtis D. Effects of infection control procedures on the accuracy of a new mechanical torque wrench system for implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(1):93-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90424-2
  20. Goheen KL, Vermilyea SG, Vossoughi J, Agar JR. Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(2): 149-55
  21. Binon PP. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a technique to prevent screw loosening. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79(4):430-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70157-X
  22. Dellinges MA, Tebrock OC. A measurement of torque values obtained with hand-held drivers in a simulated clinical setting. J Prosthodont 1993;2(4): 212-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00411.x
  23. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(1):24-32 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116230
  24. Lang LA, May KB, Wang RF. The effect of the use of a counter-torque device on the abutment-implant complex. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(4):411-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80007-9
  25. Mitrani R, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Ma T. Accuracy of electronic implant torque controllers following time in clinical service. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 ;16(3):394-9
  26. Gutierrez J, Nicholls JI, Libman WJ, Butson TJ. Accuracy of the implant torque wrench following time in clinical service. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10(6):562-7
  27. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Chwu MY, Sun TT. Accuracy of mechanical torque - limiting devices for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(2): 220-4
  28. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Accuracy of an electric torque-limiting device for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(2):278-81
  29. Cehreli MC, Akça K, Tönük E. Accuracy of a manual torque application device for morse-taper implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 ;19(5):743-8
  30. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 ;71(6):592-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90443-X