Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지

Quantitative Approaches for Agricultural and Rural Policy Evaluation

농업.농촌정책평가를 위한 정량적 분석모형 연구

  • Lee, Seong-Woo (Program in Regional Information, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yun, Seong-Do (Program in Regional Information, Seoul National University)
  • 이성우 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부 지역정보) ;
  • 윤성도 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부 지역정보)
  • Published : 2008.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study construct a new technique that can evaluate diverse rural policies, which have been applied to the rural development programs at the village level. The method incorporates spatial econometrics models with a decomposition method that has little been utilized before. We applies the technique to evaluate the rural development programs that have been carried out by the Korea Forest Service and. Korea Rural Development Agency. The technique proved to be quite useful in that the technique efficiently separate the direct effect caused by the government policy from the effect explained by the endowment effect such as regional or area characteristics, and residual effect that cannot be identified by the models. The present study concludes with suggesting more quantitative methods need to be developed to evaluate diverse government policy programs, which enables us to discern correct policy effects.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명수, 2003, 공공정책평가론, 박영사
  2. 노화준, 2006, 정책평가론, 법문사
  3. 문춘걸, 나성린, 2002, 요인분석에 의거한 국가별 정보화지수의 측정, 응용경제, 4(2), 89-114
  4. 박경수, 1989, 농가부채의 실태와 해결방안, 국회보, 271, 9-15, 국회쟁무위원회
  5. 유병복, 1998, 정책학개론, 용보출판사
  6. 이성우, 박지영, 민성희, 윤성도, 2005, 로짓.프라빗모형응용, 박영사
  7. 이정전, 2005, 경제학에서 본 정치와 정부, 박영사
  8. Alker, H. R. Jr., 1969, A Typology of Ecological Fallacies, in Dogan M. And S. Rokkan eds., Quantitative Ecological Aanalysis in the Social Science, MIT press
  9. Anderson, J. E., 1984, Public Policy-Making, 3rd ed., Rinehart and Winston
  10. Ault, R. W., R. B. Ekeland Jr., J. D. Jacson, R. S. Baba and D. S. Saurman, 1991, Somking and Absenteeism, Applied Economics, 23, 743-754 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849108841031
  11. Basilevsky, A., 1994, Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, A Wiley-Interscience Publication
  12. Blinder, A. S., 1976, On Dogmatism in Human Capital Theory, The Journal of Human Resources, 11(1), 8-22 https://doi.org/10.2307/145070
  13. Blinder, A., S., 1973, Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimation, The Journal of Human Resources, 5(4), 436-455
  14. Campbell, D. and J. Stanley, 1963, Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally & Company
  15. Campbell, D. and L. Ross, 1968, The Connecticut Crack-down on Speeding, Law and Society Review, 3(1), 31-53
  16. Ciarlo, J. A., 1981, Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques, Sage Press
  17. Coleman, J. S., 1979, Equality of Educational Opportunity, Arno Press
  18. Deninston, O. L., I. Rosenstock and V. Getting, 1968, Evaluation of Program Effectiveness, Public Health Reports, 83(4), 333-334
  19. Fisk, D., 1970, The Indianapols Fleet PlanL: an Example of Program Evaluation for Local Government, the Urban Institute
  20. Goodman, L. A., 1970, The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Ineraction among Multiple Classifications, Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 65, 226-256 https://doi.org/10.2307/2283589
  21. Gorsuch, R. L., 1983, Factor Analysis(2nd Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
  22. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln, 1981, Effective Evaluation: Improving the Uselulness of Evaluation results through Responsive and Naturalisitic Approaches, Jossey-Bass
  23. Hatry, H., L. Blair, D. Fisk and W. Kimmel, 1976, Program Analysis for State and Local Government, the Urban Institute
  24. House, E. R., 1980, Evaluationg with Validity, Sage Press
  25. Kerlinger, F. N. and E. J. Pedhazur, 1973, Regression in Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc
  26. LeSage, J. P., 1998, Spatial Econometrics, Web Book, http://www.econ.utoledo.edu/
  27. Madaus, G. F., M. Scriven and D. L. Stufflebeam, 1983, Evaluation Models: Viewpoint on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, Kluwer-Nijhoff
  28. Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent and J. M. Bibby, 2000, Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press
  29. Oaxaca, R., 1973, Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets, International Economic Review, 14(3), 693-709 https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981
  30. Robinson, W. S., 1950, Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals, Sociological Review, 15, 351-357 https://doi.org/10.2307/2087176
  31. Simon, H. A., 1954, Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(267), 467-479 https://doi.org/10.2307/2281124
  32. Smith, M. F., 1989, Evaluability Assessment: A Practical Approach, Kluwer
  33. Van Horn, E. and E. Carl, 1979, Policy Implementation in the Federal System, D.C. Health
  34. Vedung, E., 1995, 이경옥 역,정책평가개론, 한울아카데미
  35. Wachter, S. M. and I. F. Megbolugbe, 1992, Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Homeownership, Housing Policy Debate, 3(2), 333-379
  36. Wholey, J. S., 1979, Evaluation: Promise and Performance, the Urban Institute