Protein Patterns on a Vaginal Mucus during Spontaneous and Estrus Synchronization using CIDR in Korean Native Cattle (Hanwoo)

  • Chung, Hak-Jae (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Kuk (Animal Genomics and Bioinfromatics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Hwi-Cheul (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Yoon, Hyun-Il (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Suk-Dong (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Jin-Sung (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kwon, Hyeok-Jin (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Oh, Hae-Ryong (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choy, Yun-Ho (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Bok (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, Gi-Jun (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Im, Seok-Ki (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Myeung-Sik (Hanwoo Experimental Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

The aim of the present recent study was to compare the protein patterns in the vaginal mucus of Hanwoo cattles during spontaneous and CIDR induced-estrus. Ten cattles, who had been observed in estrus, received no treatment and served as the group of cattles with normal spontaneous estrus. Thirteen cattles in the CIDR received an CIDR insert on day 14 were removed and cattles were injected GnRH on day 15. Vaginal mucus samples were collected from all cattles at the same time the single AI in cattles with spontaneous estrus and the AI in cattles with induced estrus. Spontaneous and CIDR-induced estrus vaginal mucus samples were analyzed on two different array surfaces: cation-exchange (CM10), anion-exchange (Q10). In addition, using the NaCl solution by which the proteins combined after washing are 0.5, 1 and 2 M, it was fractionated and a protein was collected successively. The results are summarized as follows: 1) Ionic surfaces chemistries (Q10 and CM10) gave the best results in terms of detectable protein peaks, with more than 100 protein peaks in the two fractions and under each condition. 2) Protein mass spectrometer using 11 different proteins in protein identification of 7 were able to determine the protein. List of identified proteins as follows; Ribosome-binding protein 1, GRIP 1-associated protein 1, Katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1, Protein FAM44A, DUF729 domain-containing protein 1, Prolactin precursor, Dihydrofolate erductase. Conclusively, on the basis of this study, protein expression in the vaginal mucus could be used as an indicator for time of estrus manifestation in order to increase conception rates by applying AI at an optional time.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Eknah MM, Homeida AM, Galil AKA and Elbashir AE. 1991. Oxytocin-induced biochemical changes in cervical mucus of the goat. Theriogenology 36:143-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90443-H
  2. Boyd LJ, Gibbons AR, Tasker JB. 1972. Characteristics of cervical mucus from progestagen-treated cattle. Br. Vet. J. 128: 260-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1935(17)36986-5
  3. Bradford WD, Cahoon L, Freel SR, Hoopes LL and Eckdahl TT. 2005. An inexpensive gel electrophoresis-based polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying mRNA levels. Cell Biol. Educ. 4:157-168 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-09-0051
  4. Chretine FC. 2003. Involvement of the glycoproteic meshwork of cervical mucus in the mechanism of sperm orientation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 82:449-461 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00041.x
  5. Cox JF, Alfaro V, Montenegro V and Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2006. Computer-assisted analysis of sperm motion in goat and its relationship with sperm migration in cervical mucus. Theriogenology 66:860-867 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.062
  6. Doehr SA and Moghissi KS. 1973. Human and bovine cervical mucins. In: Blandau RJ, Moghissi KS. Editors. The Biology of the Cervix. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 125-142
  7. Hawk HW. 1987. Transport and fate of spermatozoa after insemination of cattle. J. Daily Sci. 70:1487-1503 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80173-X
  8. Hochstrasser DF, Harrington MG, Hochstrasser AC, Miller MJ and Merril CR. 1988. Methods for increasing the resolution of two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. Analy. Biochem. 173:424-435 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90209-6
  9. Linford E. 1974. Cervical mucus: an agent or a barrier to conception. J. Reprod. Fertil. 37:239-250 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0370239
  10. Prasad A, Kalalyan NR, Bachlaus NK, Arora RC and Pandey RS. 1981. Biochemical changes in the cervical mucus of buffalo after induction of estrus with prostaglandin F2$\alpha$ and cloprostenol. J. Reprod. Fertil. 62:583-587 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0620583
  11. Rae DO, Kunkel WE, Chenoweth PJ, Sand RS and Tran T. 1993. Relationship of parity and body condition score to pregnancy rates on Florida beef cattle. Theriogenology 39: 1143-1152 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90013-U
  12. Roche JF, Ireland J and Mawhinney S. 1981. Control and induction of ovulation in cattle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30:211-222
  13. Van Klinkenberg GA. 1953. Extremely high alkaline phosphatase activity in the vaginal mucus of the cow. Nature 172: 397 https://doi.org/10.1038/172397a0