Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Effect of Commitment Typed HRM Practice on Business Performance Focusing on Adjusting effects of Labor-management Relations Character

몰입형 인적자원관리 관행이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 분석 노사관계 성격의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • 김동현 (한국항만연수원 인천연수원) ;
  • 정재훈 (인하대학교 경영학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In today's business environment faced in very quick change, Human Resource Management play a key role in sustaining corporate competitive advantage and boosting organizational competency. Based on a former study, the purpose of this study is to find how individual Human Resource Management practice effects business performance and labor relations. Business performance is a positive influence on employee royalty and devotion. Also it is more influenced statistically significant impact on industrial relation of corporate. As a result of this study, we can find the significant influence from Human Resource Management practice and industrial relation.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상표(2006), 몰입형 인적자원관리와 중소기업의 성과 사이의 관계,인적자원관리연구, 제13권 제4호, 한국인적자원관리학회
  2. 박성수.황호영.김공수.이경근(2007), 디지로그시대의 인적자원관리, pp. 27
  3. 양혁승(2002), 전략적 인적자원관리: 기존 연구결과 및 향후 연구과제 개관, 인사관리 연구제 26집 2권, 한국인사관리학회
  4. 유병주.남기섭(2006),고용형태별 직무불안정성 지각이 조직구성원의 반응(EVLN)에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 인사관리연구, 제30집 3권, 한국인사관리학회
  5. 정재훈(2005), 인적자원관리, pp. 3-4
  6. 정재훈(2005), 인적자원관리, pp. 20
  7. 정재훈(2006), 노사관계론, pp. 101-102
  8. 허찬영.이현도(2006), 고성과 지향의 전략적 인적자원관리와 기술혁신: 노동자 태도의 매개효과 노동정책연구, 제6권 제4호 pp. 195-231. 한국노동연구원
  9. 송보화(2006), 인적자원관리시스템과 조직성과의 연계에 대한 실증적 고찰-제조업을 중심으로, 경영학연구, 35권 1호 pp.331-363. 한국경영학회
  10. Ashford, S. J., Cynthia, L., & Philip B.(1989), "Content, Causes, and Consequences of Job Insecurity : A Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 803-829 https://doi.org/10.2307/256569
  11. Barney, J. B. (1997), "Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage", Addison Wesley
  12. Becker, B. E., & Gerhart. B.(1996), "The impact of human resource management on organizational performance; Progress and prospects". Academy of Management Journal, 39(4). pp. 779-801 https://doi.org/10.2307/256712
  13. Lester, R. A.(1961), Labor and Industrial Relations, The Macmillan Co., p.3
  14. Elizabeth. G. C., Mark. F., Helen. H.., Steven. M. h., & Edward. G. M., "The War for Talent," Mckinsey Quarterly 3
  15. Greenhalgh, L., Zehava, R.(1984), "Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity.", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, N.3, pp. 438-448 https://doi.org/10.2307/258284
  16. Kats, H. C., Kochan, T. A., & Weber, M. R.(1985), "Assessing the Effects of Industrial Relations Systems and Effort to Improve the Quality of Working Life on Organizational Effectiveness", Academy of Management Journal 28. pp. 519
  17. Hart. S., & Banbury. C.(1994). "How Strategy-Making Processes Can Make a Difference", Strategic Management Journal. 15. 251-269 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150402
  18. Ichniowski. C., Kochan. T. A., Olson. C., & Strauss. G.(1996), "What works at work; Overview and assessment". Idustrial Uelations, 35, pp. 299-333
  19. Lawler. E. E. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage : Creating the High Involvement Organization. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
  20. King, J. E.(2000), "White collar reactions to job Insecurity and the role of the psychological contact: implications for human resource management.", Human Resource Management, 139, 1: pp. 79-92
  21. McKinlay. A. & Starkey. K(1998). Competitive Strategies and Organizational Change. Organization Studies. 9. 555-571 https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900406
  22. O'Reilly. C. & Pfeffer. J.(1998). Hidden Value. Harvard Business School Press
  23. Pfeffer. J.(1998). The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press
  24. Ulrich. D.(1997) Human Resource Champion: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results, Harvard Business School Press
  25. Walton. R. E.(1985). From Control to Commitment in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review. March-April. 77-84