한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제41권1호
  • /
  • Pages.87-100
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 대안평가지수 개발

Development of Alternative Evaluation Index Using Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques

  • 정은성 (서울대학교 공학연구소) ;
  • 이길성 (서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 박경신 (서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부)
  • 발행 : 2008.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 유역통합관리를 위한 대안들의 우선순위를 다양한 요소를 객관적으로 고려하여 산정하기 위해 대안평가지수(alternative evaluation index, AEI)를 개발하였고 이를 적용하였다. 이를 위해 물순환 건전화를 위한 다양한 대안들에 대한 연속유출 모의모형의 효과분석 결과, 다기준 의사결정 기법과 지속가능성 평가모형인 DPSIR(Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response)을 이용하여 대안의 평가지수 및 순위를 산정하였다.

The alternative evaluation index (AEI) is developed and applied to determine the priorities of some options for integrated watershed management. Based on the results of continuous simulation model, AEIs of some feasible alternatives are calculated using multicriteria decision making techniques and sustainability evaluation model, DPSIR (Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고석구, 이광만, 고익환 (1992). '다기준 의사결정기법에 의한 다목적 저수지의 운영률 평가.' 한국수문학회지, 한국수문학회, 제25권, pp. 75-82
  2. 곽승준, 유승훈, 허재용, Clifford, R.I. (2003). '퍼지다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 댐 건설영향에 대한 지역주민들의 의견평가.' 국토연구, 제38권, pp. 107- 121
  3. 김우구, 이광만, 박두호 (2006). 'MCDA 기법을 이용한 댐사업의 투자우선순위 결정.' 한국자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제39권, 제12호, pp. 1067-1080
  4. 이길성 (2007). 안양천 유역의 물순환 건전화 기술개발. 서울대학교, 과학기술부
  5. 정은성, 이길성 (2007). '다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 공간위험순위 산정.' 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제40권, 제12호, pp. 969-983
  6. 정은성, 이준석, 이길성, 김상욱, 김경태 (2007). 'HSPF모형을 이용한 안양천 유역의 대안기술 효과분석.' 한국물환경학회지, 한국물환경학회, 제22권, 제6호, pp. 962-964
  7. Abrishamchi, A., Ebrahiman, A., Tajrishi, M., and Mariňo, M.A. (2005). 'Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply.' Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, pp. 326-335 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:4(326)
  8. Bardossy, A., and Bogardi, I. (1983). 'Network design for the spatial estimation of environmental variables.' Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 12, pp. 339-369 https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(83)90046-2
  9. Borja, A., Galparsoro, I., Solaun, O., Muxika, I., Tello, E.M., Uriarte, A, and Valencia, V. (2006). 'The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status.' Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 66, pp. 84-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.021
  10. Cai, X., Lasdon, L., and Michelsen, A.M. (2004). 'Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis.' Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 4-14 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(4)
  11. Elliott, M. (2002). 'The role of the DPSIR approach and conceptual models in marine environmental management: An example for offshore wind power.' Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 44, pp. 3-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00146-7
  12. Elshorbagy, A. (2006). 'Multicriterion decision analysis approach to assess the utility of watershed modeling for management decisions.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, W9407 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004264
  13. European Environment Agency (1999). Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. Copenhagen, Denmark
  14. Fassio, A., Giupponi, C., Hiederer, R., and Simota, C. (2005). 'A decision support tool for simulating the effects of alternative policies affecting water resources: An application at the European scale.' Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 304, pp. 462-476 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.048
  15. Feas, J., Giupponi, C., and Rosato, P. (2004). 'Water management, public participation and decision support systems: the MULINO approach.' International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, University of Osnabruck, Germany
  16. Ganoulis, J. (2003). 'Evaluating alternative strategies for wastewater recycling and reuse in the Mediterranean area.' Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 11-19
  17. Gershon, M., Duckstein, L., and McAniff, R. (1982). 'Multi-objective river basin planning with qualitative criteria.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 193-202 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i002p00193
  18. Giupponi, C., Mysiak, J., Fassio, A., and Cogan, V. (2004). 'MULINO-DSS: A computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale.' Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 64, pp. 13-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2003.07.003
  19. Hartmann, L., Torno, C., Bogardi, I., and Higler, L. (1987). Methodological Guidelines for the Integrated Environmental Evaluation of Water Resources Development. Unep/Unesco Project FP/5201-85-01, Paris
  20. Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K.S. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York
  21. Lee, Y.W., Bogardi, I., and Stansbury, J. (1991). 'Fuzzy decision making in dredged-material management.' Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 117, No. 5, pp. 614-630 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1991)117:5(614)
  22. OECD (1993). 'OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews.' OECD Environment Monographs, No. 83, OECD, Paris
  23. Raju, K.S., Duckstein, L., and Arondel, C. (2000). 'Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: A case study in Spain.' Water Resources Management, Vol. 14, pp. 435-456 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011120513259
  24. Sanchez, M., Prats, F., Agell, N., and Ormazabal, G.(2005). 'Multiple-criteria evaluation for value management in Civil Engineering.' Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 131-137 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:3(131)
  25. Seo, S., Aramaki, T., Hwang, Y., and Hanaki, K. (2003).'Evaluation of solid waste management system using fuzzy composition.' Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 129. No. 6, pp. 520-531 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:6(520)
  26. Simon, H.A. (1960). The New Science of Manage- ment Decision. Harper and Brothers, New York
  27. Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P., and Faria, A.S. (2004). 'An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios.' Water Resources Management, Vol. 18, pp. 35-54 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WARM.0000015348.88832.52
  28. Stirrup, M. (2001). 'Sizing a new CSO storage tank using continuous SWMM.' Models and Applications to Urban Water System, Vol. 9 in Monography, Computational Hydraulics Institute
  29. Torno, H.C., Hartmann, L., Bogardi, I., Verhoog, F.H., and Higler, L.W.G. (1988). Trainning Guidance for the Integrated Environmental Evaluation of Water Resources Development Projects. Unep/Unesco Project FP/5201-85-01, Paris
  30. Yurdusev, M.A., and O'Connel, P.E. (2005a). 'Environmentally-sensitive water resources planning: 1. Methodology.' Water Resources Management, Vol. 19, pp. 375-397 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-7999-x
  31. Yurdusev, M.A., and O'Connel, P.E. (2005b). 'Environmentally-sensitive water resources planning: 2. A case study.' Water Resources Management, Vol. 19, pp. 399-421 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-8000-8

피인용 문헌

  1. Group Decision Making Approach to Flood Vulnerability Assessment vol.46, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.2.99
  2. Application of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques for Robust Prioritization vol.33, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.917
  3. Development of a Heavy Rain Damage Prediction Function by Risk Classification vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.503