The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

A CONTROLLED CYCLIC LOADING ON THE SURFACE TREATED AND BONDED CERAMIC: STAIRCASE METHOD

  • Yi, Yang-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Effect of surface treatment of ceramic under loading does not appear to have been investigated. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatment of esthetic ceramic, which is performed to increase the bonding strength, on the fracture stress under controlled cyclic loading condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty 1.0 mm-thick specimens were made from Mark II Vitablocs (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) and divided into 3 groups: polished (control), sandblasted, and etched. Specimens of each group were bonded to a dentin analog material base including micro-channels to facilitate the flow of water to the bonding interface. Bonded ceramics were cyclically loaded with a flat-end piston in the water (500,000 cycles, 15Hz). Following completion of cyclic loading, specimens were examined for subsurface crack formation and subsequent stress was determined and loaded to next specimen by the staircase method according to the crack existence. RESULTS: There were significant differences of mean fatigue limit in the sandblasted (222.86 ${\pm}$ 23.42 N) and etched group (222.86 ${\pm}$ 14.16 N) when compared to polished group (251.43 ${\pm}$ 10.6 N) (P<.05; Wald-type pair-wise comparison and post hoc Bonferroni test). Of cracked specimens, surface treated group showed longer crack propagation after 24 hours. All failures originated from the radial cracking without cone crack. Fracture resistance of this study was very low and comparable to failure load in the oral cavity. CONCLUSION: Well controlled cyclic loading could induce clinically relevant cracks and fracture resistance of Mark II ceramic was relatively low applicable only to anterior restorations. Surface treatment of inner surface of feldspathic porcelain in the matsicatory area could influence lifetime of restorations.

Keywords

References

  1. Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Polack MA, Lloyd IK, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. Biomaterials 2004;25:2885-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.050
  2. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Lloyd IK, Janal MN, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Materials design of ceramic-based layer structures for crowns. J Dent Res 2002;81:433-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100615
  3. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crown like layer structures: a review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:495-510 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119581
  4. Rhee YW, Kim HW, Deng Y, Lawn BR. Contact-induced damage in ceramic coatings on complied substrates: Fracture mechanics and design. J Am Ceram Soc 2001;84:1066-72 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00791.x
  5. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia- based ceramics. J Dent. 2000;28:529-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-0
  6. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent. 2004;32:91-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.006
  7. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of grinding, sandblasting, polishing and heat treatment on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina-reinforced dental ceramic. Biomaterials 2004;25:2153-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.056
  8. 2001Malament KA, Socransky SS. Survival of Dicor glassceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:511-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119415
  9. Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ, Naman A, Morris HF. Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed allceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1994;73:1824-32 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730120601
  10. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:381-6
  11. Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heatpressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003
  12. Nakazato T, Takahashi H, Yamamoto M, Nishimura F, Kurosaki N. Effect of polishing on cyclic fatigue strength of CAD/CAM ceramics. Dent Mater J 1999;18:395-402 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.18.395
  13. Saracoglu A, Cura C, Cotert HS. Effect of various surface treatment methods on the bond strength of the heat-pressed ceramic samples. J Oral Rehabil 2004 ;31:790-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01305.x
  14. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky JJ Jr. Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic Dent Mater. 2003;19:693-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00015-0
  15. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7
  16. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1
  17. Pagniano RP, Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Wang R, Katsube N. The effect of a layer of resin luting agent on the biaxial flexure strength of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:459-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.012
  18. Yi Y, Kelly JR. Effect of occlusal contact size on interfacial stresses and failure of a bonded ceramic: FEA and monotonic loading analyses. Dent Mater 2008;24:403-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.017
  19. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:652-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
  20. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1979;58:1093-6 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580031101
  21. Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Piotrowski TJ. Tensile fatigue limits of prosthodontic adhesives. J Dent Res 1991;70:208-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700031001
  22. Yoshida K, Morimoto N, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Flexural fatigue behavior of machinable and kight activated hybrid composites for esthetic restorations. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004;70B:218-22 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30035
  23. Collins JA. Staircase or up=and-down methods. In: Failure of materials in mechanical design. New York: John Wiley and sons. 1981:369-74
  24. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:536-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90075-9
  25. Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R, Cima MJ. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:430-40
  26. Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ. Effect of surface etching on the flexure strength and fracture toughness of Dicor disks containing controlled flaws. J Dent Res 1994; 73:505-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730020401
  27. Tsai YL, Petsche PE, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:27-32
  28. Deng Y, Lawn BR, Lloyd IK. Characterization of damage modes in dental ceramic bilayer structures. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:137-45 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10091
  29. Shrotriya P, Wang R, Katsube N, Seghi R, Soboyejo WO. Contact damage in model dental multilayers: an investigation of the influence of indenter size. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003:14:17-26 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021541101823
  30. Zhang Y, Song J, Lawn BR. Deep-penetrating conical cracks in brittle layers from hydraulic cyclic contact. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2005;73B: 186-93 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30195
  31. Yen TW, Blackman RB, Baez RJ. Effect of acid etching on the flexural strength of a feldspathic porcelain and a castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:224-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90056-T
  32. Malament KA, Socransky SS. Survival of Dicor glassceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:23-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70231-3
  33. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Twiggs SW. Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993 9:269-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90073-Y
  34. Ritter JE. Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures. Dent Mater 1995 11:142-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80050-6
  35. Bindl A, Luthy H, Mormann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dent Mater 2006 ;22:29-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.007