The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

A COMPARISON OF THE FIDELITY BETWEEN VARIOUS CORES FABRICATED WITH CAD/CAM SYSTEMS

  • Park, Sun-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recently, various all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems have come into wide use in dental clinic. However, there are only few domestic studies on CAD/CAM restorations. PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to compare the fidelity (absolute marginal discrepancy and internal gap) between various cores fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems (Procera system, Lava system, Cerec inLab system) and conventional metal cast core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 cores per each system were fabricated. The absolute marginal discrepancies were measured using measuring microscope and digital counter. The internal gaps were calculated using a silicone paste. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: Within the limits of this study the results were as follows. 1. The absolute marginal discrepancies were $32.5{\pm}3.7\;{\mu}m$ for metal cast core, $72.2{\pm}7.0\;{\mu}m$ for Procera core, $40.8{\pm}5.4\;{\mu}m$ for Lava core, and $55.3{\pm}8.7\;{\mu}m$ for Cerec inLab core. The internal gaps were $38.4{\pm}5.7\;{\mu}m$ for metal cast core, $71.4{\pm}5.3\;{\mu}m$ for Procera core, $45.9{\pm}7.3\;{\mu}m$ for Lava core, and $51.8{\pm}6.2\;{\mu}m$ for Cerec inLab core. 2. The fidelity of metal cast core showed the smallest gaps, followed by Lava core, Cerec inLab core, and Procera core. CONCLUSION: The fidelities of 4 core groups were all within the clinically acceptable range ($120\;{\mu}m$).

Keywords

References

  1. Land CH. A new system of restoring badly decayed teeth by means of an enamelled metallic coating. Independent Practitioner 1886;7:407
  2. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-8
  3. Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera Allceram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:529-35
  4. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  5. Sorensen SE, Larsen IB, Jorgensen KD. Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:109-14
  6. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  7. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:563-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x
  8. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit : the Procera Allceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  9. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J. Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  10. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  11. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three allceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:459-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005
  12. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  13. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  14. Valderrama S, Van Roekel N, Andersson M, Goodacre CJ, Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:29-37
  15. Morris HF. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Project NO. 242. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the marginal fit of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. Participants of CSP No. 147/242. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:198-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90453-H
  16. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:440-7
  17. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:419-424 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
  18. Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:129-34 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309041158
  19. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain- veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:506-13 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110258
  20. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents : an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:250-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.023
  21. Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, et al. Marginal fit of CAD/CAM manufactured all ceramic zirconia prostheses. J Dent Res 2001;80:42
  22. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  23. Lin MT, Sy-Munoz J, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ, Naylor WP. The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:580-90
  24. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582-93 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
  25. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84
  26. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  27. Jorgensen KD. Structure of the film of zinc phosphate cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1960;18:491-501 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356009043880
  28. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006;15:155-63 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x