대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.209-216
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

일체형 지대주의 Diamond Like Carbon 표면 처리와 나사 조임 시기가 풀림 현상에 미치는 영향

THE INFLUENCE OF ABUTMENT SCREW TIGHTENING TIMING AND DLC COATING OF CONICAL CONNECTION IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • 김기홍 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 곽재영 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 허성주 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Kim, Ki-Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 내측연결형 임플랜트와 일체형 지대주를 사용하여 최종 보철물을 시적한 뒤에 5만 번의 반복하중 후에 다시 체결하고 20만 번의 반복하중을 가한 후의 지대주 풀림토크와 20만 번의 반복하중을 받은 지대주 풀림토크가 어떻게 달라지는지를 비교하고자 하는 것이다. 실험 재료로는 타이타늄 지대주와 DLC 코팅된 지대주를 사용하였다. 실험군은 4군으로 모두 8개의 ITI SLA $4.1{\times}10mm$ 를 사용하였다. A군과 B군은 5만번, 20만번 반복하중을 가하고 Periotest값과 풀림 토크값을 측정하였으며 C군과 D군은 20만번 반복하중을 가하고 Periotest 값과 풀림토크값을 측정하였다. 풀림 토크값의 측정은 디지털 토크 게이지를 사용하였고, 반복하중은 MTS. (Bionix 850 II, MTS, U.S.A.)를 사용하였으며 100N/cm의 힘을 20도의 경사, 14Hz 의 조건으로 가하였다. A군과 C군은 코팅하지 않은 타이타늄 지대주를 사용하였으며, B군과 D군은 DLC 코팅한 지대주를 사용하였다. 1. 5만번 반복하중을 가한 뒤 측정한 풀림 토크는 B군에서 약간 더 큰 평균값을 보였다. 하지만 통계학적으로 두 군간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다 (P>0.05). 2. 20만번 반복하중을 가한 뒤 측정한 최종 풀림 토크 값은 A군은 C군보다, B군은 D군보다 약간 더 큰 평균값을 보였으나 통계학적으로 두 군간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다 (P>0.05). 3. 20만번 반복하중을 가한 최종 풀림 토크 값은 A, B군과 C, D군 사이에 통계학적으로 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다 (P>0.05).

Statement of problem: It is difficult about assessing the loosening tendency of conical connection type implant after cyclic loading with diamond like carbon coating one-piece abutments, and also about the retightening effect. Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the influence of one-piece abutment screw retightening after $5.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading and Diamond like coating Material and methods: Thirty two ITI implant were divided to 4 groups. Group 1,3-titanium abutment, group 2,4 - diamond like carbon coated abutment. Group 1,2 - $20.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading after $5.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading, Group 3,4- after $20.0{\times}10^{4}$ Cyclic loading. After cyclic loading, periotest values were taken and removal torque values of abutments were measured with a digital torque gauge. Results: 1. The removal torque of group 2 after $5.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading is slightly greater than the other groups but not significantly higher than others (P>0.05). 2. The final removal torque values after $20.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading of group 1 is bigger than group 3, and group 2 is bigger than group 4, but not significantly higher (P>0.05). 3. The final removal torque values after $20.0{\times}10^{4}$ cyclic loading of all groups are not significantly different (P>0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60
  3. Jemt T. Failure and complication in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prosthesis supported by Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:513-22
  4. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failure and complication in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-3
  5. Lekholm U, Steenberghe D, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implant in treatment of partially edentulous jaws: a prospective five year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-35
  6. Hemmings KW, Schmitt A, Zarb GA. Complication and maintenance requirementsd for fixed prostheses and over- dentures in edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:191-6
  7. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five year follow up report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:142-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x
  8. Jemt T, Lacey WR, Harris D. Osseointegrated implant for single tooth replacement: A 1 year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-32
  9. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Mosby-year book, Inc., St. Louiss 1993;669-83
  10. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of single-implant restorations as tooth replacements: a long term-follow up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:209-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00119.x
  11. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-78
  12. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single- tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5
  13. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:51-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80229-X
  14. Sutter F, Weber H, Sorensen J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:409-31
  15. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant- abutment connection : An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-26
  16. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-34
  17. Levine RA. Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG, Higginbottom F, Saunders SL. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements : results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:516-20
  18. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Clinical complications of osseintegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  19. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 1:156-8
  20. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1- piece and 2-piece conical abutment joint in implant design. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:458-64 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005458.x
  21. Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Fatique resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors - a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:542-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130515.x
  22. Cehreli MC, Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Sahin S. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched Morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:459-65 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01023.x
  23. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:71-89
  24. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. New York:Marcel Decker. Inc. 1981
  25. Cantwell A, Hobkirk JA, Prelaod loss in Gold Prosthesisretaining screws as a function of time. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:124-32
  26. Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prosthesis. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
  27. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:24-32 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116230
  28. Kim SK, Lee JB, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Lee KR, Cho LR, Lee SS. An abutment screw loosening study of a Diamond Like Carbon coated CP titanium implant. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:346-50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01475.x
  29. Weiss EI, Kozak D, Gross MD. Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:194-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108069
  30. Stanlee JP, Caputo AA, Chwu MJ. Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:220-4