The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of $Neoplan^{(R)}$ implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface and external connection

SLA 표면 처리 및 외측 연결형의 국산 임플랜트에 대한 임상적, 방사선학적 평가

  • An, Hee-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Moon, Hong-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shim, Jun-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyu-Sung (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 안희석 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 문홍석 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 심준성 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이근우 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2008.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Since the concept of osseointegration in dental implants was introduced by $Br{{\aa}}nemark$ et al, high long-term success rates have been achieved. Though the use of dental implants have increased dramatically, there are few studies on domestic implants with clinical and objective long-term data. Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to provide long-term data on the $Neoplan^{(R)}$ implant, which features a sandblasted and acid-etched surface and external connection. Material and methods: 96 $Neoplan^{(R)}$ implants placed in 25 patients in Yonsei University Hospital were examined to determine the effect of the factors on marginal bone loss, through clinical and radiographic results during 18 to 57 month period. Results: 1. Out of a total of 96 implants placed in 25 patients, two fixtures were lost, resulting in 97.9% of cumulative survival rate. 2. Throughout the study period, the survival rates were 96.8% in the maxilla and 98.5% in the mandible. The survival rates were 97.6% in the posterior regions and 100% in the anterior regions. 3. The mean bone loss for the first year after prosthesis placement and the mean annual bone loss after the first year for men were significantly higher than that of women (P<0.05). 4. The group of partial edentulism with no posterior teeth distal to the implant prosthesis showed significantly more bone loss compared to the group of partial edentulism with presence of posterior teeth distal to the implant prosthesis in terms of mean bone loss for the first year and after the first year (P<0.05). 5. The mean annual bone loss after the first year was more pronounced in posterior regions compared to anterior regions (P<0.05). 6. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found in the following factors: jaws, type of prostheses, type of opposing dentition, and submerged /non-submerged implants (P<0.05). Conclusion: On the basis of these results, the factors influencing marginal bone loss were gender, type of edentulism, and location in the arch, while the factors such as arch, type of prostheses, type of opposing dentition, submerged / non- submerged implants had no significant effect on bone loss. In the present study, the cumulative survival rate of the $Neoplan^{(R)}$ implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface was 97.9% up to a maximum 57-month period. Further long-term investigations for this type of implant system and evaluation of other various domestic implant systems are needed in future studies.

골유착 개념에 기반한 치과용 임플랜트가 $Br{\aa}nemark$ 등에 의해 도입된 이후로 치과 치료에서 임플랜트를 이용한 방법은 장기적으로 높은 성공률을 보여 왔다. 임플랜트를 이용한 치료법이 상실된 치아의 수복을 위해 우선적으로 고려되어야 할 중요한 방법으로 인식되면서 임플랜트를 이용한 방법을 선호하게 되었고 적용 범위 및 사용 빈도도 급증하였다. 예전에 비해서 국산 임플랜트의 사용도 증가하였으나 장기간의 임상적, 객관적인 자료를 가진 국산 임플랜트의 수는 많지 않은 상태이다. 본 연구는 SLA 표면 처리 및 외측 연결형의 국산 임플랜트에 관하여 18개월에서부터 57개월까지의 임상적, 방사선학적 결과에 대한 후향적 분석을 실시하였다. 연세대학교 치과대학병원에서 네오플란트$^{(R)}$ 임플랜트 (네오바이오텍, 서울, 한국)를 이용하여 치료받은 25명의 환자에게 식립된 96개의 임플랜트를 대상으로 하였고, 대상자 중 남성의 평균 연령은 63.5세, 여성의 평균 연령은 44.3세였다. 진료기록부를 통해 성별, 연령, 무치악 유형, 식립 위치, 식립된 임플랜트의 직경 및 길이, 2차 수술 여부, 보철물의 유형, 대합치의 유형, 임상적 합병증의 종류 및 빈도 등을 조사하여 그에 따른 분포 및 생존율의 차이와 함께 이들 항목이 변연골 흡수량에 미치는 영향을 조사하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 총 25명에게 식립된 96개의 임플랜트 중 2개가 실패하여 누적 생존율은 97.9%로 나타났다. 2. 정기검진이 가능했던 88개의 임플랜트에 대해서는 상악에서의 생존율이 96.2%, 하악에서의 생존율은 98.4%였고, 구치부에서의 생존율은 97.5%였으며 전치부에서의 생존율은 100%였다. 3. 보철물 장착 후 1년과 1년 이후의 연간 흡수량에서 남성이 여성보다 변연골 흡수량이 많았다 (P<0.05). 4. 임플랜트 지지 보철물 후방에 자연치가 존재하는 경우가 존재하지 않는 경우보다 보철물 장착 후 첫 1년과 1년 이후 모두에서 연간 흡수량이 적었다 (P<0.05). 5. 보철물 장착 1년 이후의 연간 흡수량은 전치보다 구치에서 더 많은 변연골 흡수를 보였다 (P<0.05). 6. 악궁 간, 보철물의 유형, 대합치의 유형, 2차 수술 여부에 따른 변연골 흡수량의 차이는 보이지 않았다 (P>0.05). 이상의 결과를 토대로 변연골 흡수량에 영향을 주는 요소로 성별, 무치악의 유형, 악궁 내 위치였으며, 악궁 간, 보철물의 유형, 대합치의 유형, 2차 수술 여부에 따른 변연골 흡수량 차이는 없었다. 본 연구에서 최대 57개월까지의 기간 동안 SLA 표면 처리 및 외측 연결형의 국산 임플랜트의 임상적인 성공률은 만족스러운 결과를 보였으며 변연골 흡수량도 임플랜트 성공기준에 부합하였으나, 이보다 더 장기적인 평가가 필요하며 다양한 국산 임플랜트 시스템에 대한 중장기적인 연구가 지속되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Sur 1977;16:1-132
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Enquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, Kristersson L, Kvint S, Kondell PA, Palmquist J, Werndahl L, Astrand P. Osseointegrated oral implants - a Swedish multicenter study 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implant. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-96 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  4. Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:178-86 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00019.x
  5. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screwshaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  6. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, Snetivy D, Nolte LP. Interface shear of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P
  7. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-39 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  8. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark $system^{\circledR}\;TiUnite^{TM}$ and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5s:57-63
  9. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2 - Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-64
  10. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence. 1985;199-209
  11. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  12. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Brugenakte CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on $ITI^{\circledR}$ implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on $ITI^{\circledR}$ SLA implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2002;13:144-53 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  13. Seo JY, Shim JS, Lee JH, Lee KW. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:394-404
  14. Bryant SR, Zarb GA. Crestal bone loss proximal to oral implants in older and younger adults. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:589-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00199-9
  15. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  16. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Fouryear interim reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200
  17. Esposito M, Thomsen P, Ericson LE, Lekholm U. Histopathologic observations on early implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:789-810
  18. Quirynen M, Naert D, van Steenberghe. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-11 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  19. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:143-52 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x
  20. Mombelli A, van Oosten MAC, Schurch E, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  21. Becker W, Becker BE, Israelson H, Lucchini JP, Handelsman M, Ammons W, Rosenberg E, Rose L, Tucker LM, Lekholm U. One-step surgical placement of Branemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillo fac Implants 1997;12:454-62
  22. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Longterm evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol 1999;70:896-901 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.896
  23. Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:162-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130206.x
  24. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:569-77
  25. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Quirynen M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Biologic outcome of implantsupported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 2: a longitudinal radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:390-5 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130407.x
  26. August M, Chung K, Chang Y, Glowacki J. Influence of estrogen status on endosseous implant osseointegration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1285-9 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.27515
  27. Lang NP, Mombelli A, Tonetti MS, Bragger U, Hammerle CHF. Clinical trials on therapies for peri-implant infections. Ann Periodontol 1997;2:343-56 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.1997.2.1.343
  28. Becker W, Becker B, Ricci A, Bahat O, Rosenberg E, Rose LF, Handelsman M, Israelson H. A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screwshaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:159-65 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00007.x
  29. Jaffin R, Berman C. The excessive loss of Branemark fixture in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  30. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-6
  31. Porras R, Anderson GB, Caffese R, Narendran S, Trejo PM. Clinical response to 2 different therapeutic regimens to treat peri-implant mucositis. Journal of Periodontology 2002;73:1118-25 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1118