Effects of activators contained in adhesives on dentin bond strengths

상아질 접착제에 포함된 활성제의 사용 유무가 자가중합 복합레진의 상아질에 대한 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kang, Hye-Kyung (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical) ;
  • Shin, Joo-Hee (Restorative Dentistry, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Suh, Kyu-Won (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Korea Universitry, Graduate School of Clinical) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Korea Universitry, Graduate School of Clinical)
  • 강혜경 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 심미수복학과) ;
  • 신주희 (고려대학교 구로병원 보존과) ;
  • 서규원 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 심미수복학과) ;
  • 류재준 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 심미수복학과)
  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

Statement of problem: An incompatibility between the initiator systems of self-curing composite resins and light-curing adhesives was supposed recently. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of activators for self/dual bonding on dentin shear bonding strengths. Material and methods: Fifty human molars were divided into 5 groups. A flat dentin surface was created for each tooth. A self-curing composite resin (Luxacore) was bonded with the following adhesives (n = 10); One-Step, Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE, Prime&Bond NT and AdheSE were also used in combination with activators. Shear bond strengths were measured after 24 hours of water storage. The specimens were loaded in shear in the Instron until failure at a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}$= 0.05). Results: The dentin adhesive systems in order of decreasing median bond strength were One-Step > Prime&Bond NT with activator, AdheSE with activator > Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE. Among adhesives, One-Step had the highest bond strength. Prime&Bond NT with activator had higher bond strengths than Prime&Bond NT that was used alone, and so was AdheSE. Conclusion: Shear bond strengths were increased in Prime&Bond NT and AdheSE when these were used with activators comparing used without activators. But using activators was not effective clinically comparing One-Step.

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 자가중합 또는 이중중합을 위한 활성제가 포함된 상아질 접착제에서 활성제의 사용 유무가 자가중합 복합레진과 상아질 접착제간의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험을 위하여 우식 및 충전물이 없는 건전한 대구치 50개를 주문제작한 아크릴릭 레진블록에 포매한 후, 모델 트리머로 연마하여 평활한 상아질면을 만든 후, 600grit 실리콘 카바이드 페이퍼로 연마하고 증류수에 보관하였다. 50개의 시편을 10개씩 5개 군으로 나눈 후, 상아질 접착제를 제조사의 지시대로 도포한 후, 플라스틱 주형을 이용하여 자가중합 복합레진 (Luxacore)을 접착시켰다. 상아질 접착제는 One-Step (OS군), Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE를 이용하였는데 Prime&Bond NT와 AdheSE는 단독으로 사용한 군 (PB군, AS군)과 활성제를 같이 사용한 군 (PBA군, ASA군)으로 다시 나누었다. 증류수에 24시간 보관 후, 인스트론 만능시험기를 사용하여 시편에 1 mm/min의 전단속도로 하중을 가하여 시편이 분리되는 최대 하중을 측정한 뒤, 단위 면적 당 결합강도 (MPa)로 환산하여 One-way ANOVA를 이용하여 비교, 분석하고 5% 유의수준에서 Tukey HSD 검정을 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 각 군의 전단결합강도의 평균을 보면, OS군이 18.6 MPa로 가장 높았고 그 다음이 PBA군 (10.3 MPa)과 ASA군 (10.2 MPa)이었고, PB군과 AS군이 각각 5.9 MPa, 6.0 MPa로 가장 낮은 전단결합강도를 나타내었다. 결론: 본 실험을 통해 Prime&Bond NT와 AdheSE에서 활성제를 같이 사용한 경우, 활성제를 사용하지 않은 경우보다 전단결합강도가 높아짐을 알 수 있었지만, 활성제가 포함되어 있지 않은 One-Step보다는 낮은 수치였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathway of the pulp. 9th edition. Mosby 2006, p807-11
  2. Cohen BI, Paqnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90006-2
  3. O'keefe KL, Powers JM. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:451-6
  4. Castellon P, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four core materials to dentin bonded with light-cured or dual-cured adhesive. Am J Dent 2004;17:401-3
  5. Bolhuis PB, de Gee AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, El Zohairy AA, Feilzer AJ. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:223-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.016
  6. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003;19:758-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00023-X
  7. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing core buildup composite bonded to dentin 9 dentin adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:620-3 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119683
  8. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:542-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00016-1
  9. Moll K, Schuster B, Haller B. Dentin bonding of lightand self-curing resin composites using simplified totaland self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int 2007;38:27-35
  10. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. PartI. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:27-40
  11. Oooka S, Miyazaki M, Rikut A, Moore BK. Influence of polymerization mode of dual-polymerized resin direct core foundation systems on bond strengths or bovine dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:239-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.020
  12. Franco EB, Lopes LG, D'alpino PH, Pereira JC, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF. Evaluation of compatibility between different types of adhesives and dual-cured resin cement. Adhes Dent 2002;4:271-5
  13. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7
  14. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 2003;28:747-55
  15. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. PartII. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:91-105
  16. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. PartIII. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-82
  17. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Peters MC. Adhesive permeability affects composite coupling to dentin treated with a self-etch adhesive. Oper Dent 2003;28:610-21
  18. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985;64:1409-11 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121801
  19. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Combe EC, Simpson CH 3rd, Nunes MF. Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent 2001;14:137-40
  20. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Bonding of dual-curing resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:299-304