Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aminolysis of 2,4-Dinitrophenyl 2-Furoate and 2-Thiophenecarboxylate: Effect of Modification of Nonleaving Group from Furoyl to Thiophenecarbonyl on Reactivity and Mechanism

  • Um, Ik-Hwan (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Min, Se-Won (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Chuna, Sun-Mee (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University)
  • Published : 2008.07.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Second-order rate constants have been determined spectrophotometrically for reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl 2- thiophenecarboxylate (2) with a series of alicyclic secondary amines in 80 mol % $H_2O$/20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ${\pm}$ 0.1 ${^{\circ}C}$. The Brønsted-type plot exhibits a downward curvature, i.e., the slope decreases from 0.74 to 0.34 as the amine basicity increases. The $pK_a$ at the center of the Brønsted curvature, defined as $pK_a^o$, has been determined to be 9.1. Comparison of the Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 2 with that for the corresponding reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl 2-furoate (1) suggests that reactions of 1 and 2 proceed through a common mechanism, although 2 is less reactive than 1. The curved Brønsted-type plot has been interpreted as a change in RDS of a stepwise mechanism. The replacement of the O atom in the furoyl ring by an S atom (1 $\rightarrow$ 2) does not alter the reaction mechanism but causes a decrease in reactivity. Dissection of the apparent second-order rate constants into the microscopic rate constants has revealed that the $k_2/k_{-1}$ ratio is not influenced upon changing the nonleaving group from furoyl to thiophenecarbonyl. However, $k_1$ has been calculated to be smaller for the reactions of 2 than for the corresponding reactions of 1, indicating that the C=O bond in the thiophenecarboxylate 2 is less electrophilic than that in the furoate 1. The smaller k1 for the reactions of 2 is fully responsible for the fact that 2 is less reactive than 1.

Keywords

References

  1. Jencks, W. P. Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 511-527 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00070a001
  2. Jencks, W. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1981, 10, 345-375 https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9811000345
  3. Hupe, D. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 451-464 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00444a023
  4. Jencks, W. P.; Gilchrist, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2622-2637 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01012a030
  5. Kirsch, J. F.; Clewell, W.; Simon, A. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 127-132 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01265a023
  6. Castro, E. A.; Echevarria, G. R.; Opazo, A.; Robert, P. S.; Santos, J. G. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 62-67 https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1285
  7. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Campodonico, P. R.; Leis, J. R.; Garcia-Rio, L.; Santos, J. G. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19, 683-688 https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1116
  8. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Gazitua, M.; Santos, J. G. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4863-4869 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2006.03.013
  9. Castro, E. A.; Campodonico, P. R.; Contreras, R.; Fuentealba, P.; Santos, J. G.; Leis, J. R.; Garcia-Rio, L.; Saez, J. A.; Domingo, L. R. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2555-2562 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2005.12.044
  10. Oh, H. K.; Oh, J. Y.; Sung, D. D.; Lee, I. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5624-5629 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo050606b
  11. Oh, H. K.; Jin, Y. C.; Sung, D. D.; Lee, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1240-1244 https://doi.org/10.1039/b500251f
  12. Sung, D. D.; Koo, I. S.; Yang, K. Y.; Lee, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 432, 426-430 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.11.002
  13. Jeong, K. S.; Oh, H. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 2535-2538 https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2007.28.12.2535
  14. Campodonico, P. R.; Fuentealba, P.; Castro, E. A.; Santos, J. G.; Contreras, R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1754-1760 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo048127k
  15. Arcelli, A.; Concilio, C. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1682-1688 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo9514681
  16. Maude, A. B.; Williams, A. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 691-696
  17. Um, I. H.; Yoon, S.; Park, H. R.; Han, H. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1618-1624 https://doi.org/10.1039/b801422a
  18. Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2979-2985 https://doi.org/10.1039/b607194e
  19. Um, I. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Baek, M. H.; Park, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9191-9197 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo061682x
  20. Um, I. H.; Shin, Y. H.; Han, J. Y.; Mishima, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7715-7720 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo061308x
  21. Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Ko, S. H.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5800-5803 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0606958
  22. Um, I. H.; Kim, E. J.; Park, H. R.; Jeon, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2302-2306 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo052417z
  23. Um, I. H.; Han, H. J.; Baek, M. H.; Bae, S. Y. J. Org.Chem. 2004, 69, 6365-6370 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0492160
  24. Castro, E. A. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3505-3524 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990001d
  25. Castro, E. A.; Cubillos, M.; Aliaga, M.; Evangelisti, S.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2411-2416 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo035451r
  26. Castro, E. A.; Aguayo, R.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8157-8161 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0348120
  27. Castro, E. A.; Andujar, M.; Toro, A.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3608-3613 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo034008d
  28. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Campodonico, P.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8911-8916 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo026390k
  29. Gresser, M. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6970-6980 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00463a033
  30. Castro, E. A.; Valdivia, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1668-1672 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00360a007
  31. Castro, E. A.; Santander, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3595-3600 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00219a029
  32. Castro, E. A.; Steinfort, G. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1983, 453-457
  33. Castro, E. A.; Aguayo, R.; Bessolo, J.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7788-7791 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo051052f
  34. Castro, E. A.; Aguayo, R.; Bessolo, J.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3530-3536 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo050119w
  35. Castro, E. A.; Vivanco, M.; Aguayo, R.; Aguayo, R.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5399-5404 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049260f
  36. Um, I. H.; Park, Y. M.; Fujio, M.; Mishima, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4816-4821 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0705061
  37. Um, I. H.; Kim, K. H.; Park, H. R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3937-3942 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049694a
  38. Um, I. H.; Jeon, S. E.; Seok, J. A. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1237-1243 https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200500647
  39. Um, I. H.; Chun, S. M.; Akhtar, K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 220-224 https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2007.28.2.220
  40. Um, I. H.; Hong, J. Y.; Seok, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1438-1444 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo048227q
  41. Um, I. H.; Chun, S. M.; Chae, O. M.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3166-3172 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049812u
  42. Um, I. H.; Hong, J. Y.; Kim, J. J.; Chae, O. M.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5180-5185 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo034190i
  43. Um, I. H.; Akhtar, K.; Park, Y. M.; Khan, S. B. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 1353-1357 https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2007.28.8.1353
  44. Castro, E. A.; Ureta, C. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2153-2159 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00270a026
  45. Gresser, M. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6963-6970 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00463a032
  46. Satterthwait, A. C.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7018-7031 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00829a034
  47. Albert, A. Physical Methods in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A. R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, 1963; vol. 1, p 44
  48. Bell, R. P. The Proton in Chemistry; Methuen: London, U. K., 1959; p 159

Cited by

  1. Aminolysis of 2,4-Dinitrophenyl and 3,4-Dinitrophenyl Benzoates: Effect of ortho-Nitro Group on Reactivity and Mechanism vol.29, pp.10, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.10.1915
  2. Pyridinolyses of 2,4-Dinitrophenyl Phenyl Carbonate and 2,4-Dinitrophenyl Benzoate: Effect of Nonleaving Group on Reactivity and Mechanism vol.31, pp.7, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.7.1915