Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of implant survival rate by sinus lifting technique in implantation with sinus lift

상악동 거상술을 동반한 임플란트 식립 시에 거상술 방법에 따른 임플란트 생존율의 비교

  • Park, Kwang-Su (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Hong, Ki-Seok (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
  • 박광수 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 홍기석 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 임성빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was comparison of survival rate of implant as two sinus elevation techniques and when window opening procedure had done it was comparison of survival rate of implant between the procedure of implantation after 6 month of sinus elevation to allow healing period and that of implantation with sinus elevation simultaneously. Material and Methods: All 79 of patients treated at DanKook University Dental Hospital Dept. of Periodontics for 164 implantation of maxillary posterior edentulous area with sinus elevation. Sinus elevation technique was divided of the technique : Osteotome technique and window opening technique. Result: 14 implants among 96 implants was failed implants of using osteotome for sinus elevation whereas one implant of 68 implants was failed of using window opening technique. Conclusion: Window opening technique had higher survival rate than osteotome technique. In case of window opening, there was no significant difference of immediate implantation and delayed implantation.

Keywords

References

  1. Boss LP, Taylor TD. Problems associated with implant rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:117-126
  2. Lekholom U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparations. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA. & Albreksson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 1st ed Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1985:199-220
  3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38: 613-616
  4. Tatum H. Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229
  5. Jensen J, Krantz E, Sindet S. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with bone grafting and osseointegrated implants: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:27-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90175-2
  6. Adell R, Lekholm U, Grndahl K et al. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:233-246
  7. Isaksson S. Evaluation of three bone grafting techniques for severely resorbed maxillae in conjunction with immediated endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:679-688
  8. Kahnberg KE, Nystrm E, Bartholdsson L. Combined use of bone grafts and Branemark fixtures in the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:297-304
  9. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compen Cont Educ Dent 1994;2:152-160
  10. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacone VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:11-32
  11. Summer. RB. The osteotome technique: Part III: Less methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compen Cont Educ Dent 1994;15:698-708
  12. Kahnberg KE, Ekestubbe A, Grandahl K, Nilson P, Hirsch JM. Sinus liftingprocedure. I. One-stage surgery with bone transplant and implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2001;12:479-487 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x
  13. Massimo D, Fabbro B, Tiziano T, Luca F, Roberto W. Systemic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2004;24: 565-577
  14. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  15. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  16. Friberg B, Jempt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146
  17. Johns RB, Jempt T, Heath MR et al. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:513-522
  18. Jempt, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: A 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-311
  19. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement on implants in the posterior maxillae: Report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:151-161
  20. Adell R, Lekholmm U, Rockler B, Branmark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1981;10:387-416
  21. Fugazzotto PA, Viassis J. Long term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approachs and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:52-58
  22. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  23. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reconstruction of theseverely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-475
  24. Quinones CR, Hurzeler MB, Schupbach P. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys.: PartII. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:487-496 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080607.x
  25. Rosen PS, Summers JR et al. The bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique : a multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;6:853-858
  26. Cavicchia F, Braviu F, Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 2001;21:475-85