DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Stocking Density on Performance and Blood Characteristics of Broiler in Summer

혹서기 사육 밀도가 육계의 생산성 및 혈액 성상에 미치는 영향

  • Yu, D.J. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Na, J.C. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Jang, B.G. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Lee, D.S. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, S.H. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, J.H. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kang, K.H. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kang, H.G. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Suh, O.S. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kang, H.S. (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • 유동조 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 나재천 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 장병귀 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 이덕수 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 김상호 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 김지혁 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 강근호 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 강환구 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 서옥석 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 강희설 (축산과학원 축산자원개발부 가금과)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of stocking density on performance and blood characteristics of broiler chicken in summer. One day-old 648 male commercial broiler chicks(Ross strain) were divided into 3 groups with 4 replicates(12 pens), 41 to 69 birds per pen, to compare the stocking density difference on growth performance and blood characteristics. Birds in T1, T2 and T3 were reared in different size 0.050, 0.066, 0.083 $m^2$/bird floor, respectively. The birds were fed the same experimental diet ad libitum for 5 weeks. Chickens were weekly weighed and one bird was selected from each pen to measure blood characteristics at the end of experiment. Body weight and feed intake increased significantly in low density treatment(T3) compare to that of high density treatment(P<0.05). Feed conversion was significantly improved in customary treatment(T2) relative to that of other treatments(P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in moisture contents of bedding among treatments. In blood characteristics, low density treatment(T3) decreased the total protein, cholesterol and albumin, but were no significant difference. From the result of this study, it could be concluded that the higher stocking density might give more stress to the birds from physical stimuli and thus were harmful environment causing lower productions compared to the lower ones

본 연구는 육계의 개방 계사에서 사육 밀도에 따라 고밀도(0.050$m^2$/수), 관행(0.066$m^2$/수), 저밀도(0.083$m^2$/수) 사육구로 구분하여 사육 밀도가 여름철 육계 생산성에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 실시하였다. 공시계는 육계 초생추 Ross로서 684수를 이용하였으며, 5주간 사양 시험을 실시하였다. 기초 사료 영양소 함량은 사육 전기($0{\sim}3$주)에 ME 3,100 kcal/kg, CP 22.0%, 후기($4{\sim}5$주)에는 각각 3,100 kcal/kg, 20.0%로 하였다. 사육 밀도에 의한 육계의 체중은 5주령에 고밀도 처리구인 T1이 관행적인 T2와 저밀도구인 T3 처리구에 비해 유의적으로(P<0.05) 감소하였다. 사료 섭취량도 체중의 변화와 동일한 결과를 보였다. 사료 요구율은 관행적인 T2 처리구에서 유의적으로(P<0.05) 개선되었다. 음수 섭취량과 깔짚 수분 함수율은 시험 전 기간동안 처리구간에 통계적인 차이가 없었다. 혈청 성분의 분석결과에서는 total protein, cholesterol 및 albumin의 수치가 T3에서 낮은 경향이었으나 유의성은 인정되지 않았다. 본 연구 결과 육계의 사육 밀도 증가는 생산성을 감소시키며 개체에 스트레스를 증가시켜 폐사율의 증가와 도체 품질을 저하시킬 수 있는 가능성을 시사하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bell DD, Swanson MH 1975 Crowding of chickens in cages reduces you profits. University of California Leaflet 2273, Riverside, CA
  2. Bessie W, Reiter K 1992 The influence of floor space on the behavior of broilers. Deutsche Veterinarmedizinische Gesellschaft e. v. Fachgruppe Verhattensforchung, Freigurg, Breisgau, Germany
  3. Bilgili SF, Hess JB 1995 Placement density influences broiler carcass grade and meat yields. J Appl Poultry Res 4:384- 389 https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/4.4.384
  4. Carr LE, Wheaton FW, Douglass LW 1990 Empirical models to determine ammonia concentrations from broiler chicken litter. Trans SAAE 33:1337-1342
  5. Cravener TL, Roush WB, mashaly MM 1992 Broiler production under varying population densities. Poultry Sci 71:427-433 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710427
  6. Davami A, Wineland MJ, Jones WT, Peterson RA 1987 Effects of population size, floor space, and feeder space upon productive performance, external appearance, and plasma corticosterone concentration of laying hens. Poultry Sci 66:251- 257 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660251
  7. Deaton JW, Reece FN, Vardaman TH 1968 The effect of temperature and density on broiler performance. Poultry Sci 47:293-300 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0470293
  8. Dozier III WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Lott BD, Vizzier-Thazton Y 2005 Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Sci 84:1332-1338 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1332
  9. Feddes JJR, Emmanuel EJ, Zuidhof MF 2002 Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Sci 81: 774-779 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.774
  10. Heckert RA, Estevez I, Russel-Cohen E, Pettit-Riley R 2002 Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Sci 81:451-457 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.451
  11. Newberry RC, Hall JW 1988 Space utilization by broiler chickens in floor pens. Pages 305-309 in Proceedings of the International Congress of Applied Ethology in Farm Animals. J. Unshelm, G. Van Putten, K. Zeeb, and I. Ekesbo, ed. Skara, KTBL, Darmatadt, Germany
  12. Okpokho, NA, Craig JV, Milliken GA 1987 Density and group size effects caged hens of two genetic stocks differing in escape and avoidance behavior. Poultry Sci 66:1905-1910 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661905
  13. Proudfoot FG, Hulan HW, Ramey DR 1979 The effect of four stocking density on broiler carcass grade, the incidence of breast blisters, and other performance traits. Poultry Sci 58: 791-793 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0580791
  14. Puron D, Santamaria R, Segura JC, Alamilla JL 1995 broiler performance at different stocking densities. J Appl Poultry Res 4:55-60 https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/4.1.55
  15. Robinson D 1979 Effects of cage shape, colony size, floor area, and cannibalism preventative measures on layer performance. Br Poultry Sci 20:345-356 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667908416592
  16. Roush WB, Mashaly MM, Graves HB 1984 Effects of increased bird population in a fixed cage area on production and economic responses of Single Comb White Leghorn Laying Hens. Poultry Sci 63:45-48 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0630045
  17. Sandoval MR, Miles D, Jacobs RD 1991 Cage density and house temperature gradient effects on performance of white Leghorn hens. Poultry Sci 70(Suppl. 1):103(Abstr.)
  18. SAS Institute 2004 SAS User's Guide. Statistics. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
  19. Shanawany MM 1988 Broiler performance under high stocking densities. Br Poultry Sci 29:43-52 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668808417025
  20. Thaxton JP, Dozier III WA, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Lott BD, Vizzier-Thazton Y 2005 Evaluation of stocking density on physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Abstr 17 in Int Poultry Sci Forum SPSS, Tucker, GA
  21. 장병귀 서옥석 김지혁 강희설 김상호 나재천 이덕수 김인식 유동조 2005 유기사양방식이 산란계의 장기발달에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회 제22차 정기총회 및 학술발표회 118-119

Cited by

  1. Effect of Different Stocking Density on Eating Behavior of Hanwoo Steers (Bos taurus coreanae) During Growing Period vol.53, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2011.53.5.489