한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제31권8호
  • /
  • Pages.705-710
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자동화 컨테이너 터미널에서 수입 컨테이너 장치 블록 크기 결정을 위한 모형

Models for Determining the Size of Import Container Block in Automated Container Terminals

  • 김기영 (동서대학교 국제관계학부 물류유통학)
  • Kim, Ki-Young (Department of international Logistics, Division of International Relations, Dongseo University)
  • 발행 : 2007.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

자동화 컨테이너 터미널의 생산성은 자동화된 트랜스퍼 크레인(Automated Transfer Crane, ATC)의 속도에 관계된 성능뿐 만 아니라 컨테이너 블록의 크기에 크게 영향을 받는다. 본 연구에서는 ATC의 컨테이너 취급시간과 장치공간을 고려하여 수입 컨테이너 장치 블록의 크기를 어떻게 결정할 것인가에 대해서 다룬다. 먼저, 전형적인 수입 컨테이너 블록에서 ATC의 컨테이너 취급시간을 평가하는 모형을 제시한다. 둘째, 수입 컨테이너 블록의 크기를 결정하는 세 가지의 수리모형을 제시한다. 컨테이너 장치 블록의 크기를 결정하기 위해 제시한 모형들에 대한 수치예제를 제시한다.

The productivity of automated container terminals is significantly affected by not only the speed related performances of automated transfer cranes(ATCs) but also the sizes of container blocks. In this paper, it is discussed how to determine the size of import container blocks considering both the container handling times of an ATC and their storage space. Firstly, evaluation models are suggested for the container handling times of an ATC in a typical import container blocks. Secondly, three mathematical formulations are suggested to determine the size of import container blocks. Numerical experiments for the suggested models to determine the size of import container block are provided.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김기영 (2006), 'Evaluation Models for the Container Handling Times of the Automated Transfer Crane in Container Terminals', IE Interfaces, 19(3), 214-224
  2. Chu, C. Y. and Huang, W. C. (2005), 'Determining Container Terminal Capacity on the Basis of an Adopted Yard Handling System', Transport Review, 25(2), 181-199 https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164042000244608
  3. Kim, K. H. and Kim, H. B. (2002), 'The Optimal Sizing of the Storage Space and Handling Facilities for Import Containers', Transportation Research B, 36, 821-835 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00033-9
  4. Saanen, Y. A. and Valkengoed, M. V. (2005), 'Comparison of Three Automated Stacking Alternatives by Means of Simulation', Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simultaneous Conference, M. E. Kuhl, N.M. Steiger, F.B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, eds
  5. Taleb-Ibrahimi, M., Castilho, B. D., and Daganzo, C. F. (1993), 'Storage Space vs Handling Work in Container Terminals', Transportation Research B, 27B(1), 13-32
  6. Van Hee, K. M. and Wijbrands, R. J. (1988), 'Decision Support System for Container Terminal Planning', European Journal of Operational Research, 34, 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90147-6
  7. Vis, I. F. A. (2006), 'A Comparative Analysis of Storage and Retrieval Equipment at a Container Terminal', International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 680-693