Development of Capacity Spectrum Method for Shear Building to Estimate the Maximum Story Drift

전단빌딩의 최대 층간변위를 예측하기 위한 역량스펙트럼법 개발

  • 김선필 (현대건설기술개발원 토목설계팀) ;
  • 김두기 (국립군산대학교 토목환경공학부) ;
  • 곽효경 (한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과) ;
  • 고성혁 (국립군산대학교 토목환경공학부)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

In the current domestic and overseas standards concerning seismic design, especially on the capacity & demand spectra in the multi-story building, failure is caused more by story drift than by displacement; and the existing capacity spectrum method (CSM) does not make a close estimate of story drift because response is derived using displacement. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved CSM to estimate story drift and its direct effect on the collapse of structures, yet still maintaining the same advantage and convenience of the existing CSM about a most basic model of multi-story building: shear building. To establish its reliability, the proposed method is applied to an example model and results are then compared with those obtained through nonlinear time-history analysis.

다층구조물의 경우 변위보다 층간변위에 의해 구조물의 파괴가 발생되나 현행 국 내외 내진설계 규준에 제시된 역량스펙트럼 법에서는 변위에 의한 응답산정으로 층간변위를 정확히 예측할 수가 없었다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 다층구조물의 가장 기본적인 모델인 전단빌딩(Shear Building)에 대하여 기존의 역량해석법의 간편성과 장점을 변함없이 유지하면서, 구조물의 파괴에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 층간변위를 실제에 가깝게 예측하고 구조물의 내진성능을 평가할 수 있는 개선된 역량스펙트럼 법을 제안하고자 한다. 나아가 제안된 방법을 예제구조물에 적용하고 시간이력 해석결과와 비교함으로서 제안된 방법의 신뢰성에 대한 검증을 수행하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김두기(2005) 구조동역학. 구미서관
  2. 곽효경, 홍성진, 김영상(2006) 다경간 교량 구조물의 지진응답 평가를 위한 개선된 모드별 비탄성 정적 해석법에 관한 연구, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 26(3A), pp.497-512
  3. 송종걸(2004) 역량스펙트럼 방법을 이용한 다자유도 교량의 비탄성 지진응답 평가, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 24(3A), pp.541-550
  4. Applied Technology Council(1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building, ATC 40, Redwood City, CA
  5. Applied Technology Council(1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273): and NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of building (FEMA 274), ATC 33, Redwood City, CA
  6. Chopra, A.K., Geol, R.K.(1999) Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum. Earthquake Spectra. 15(4). pp.637-656 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586065
  7. Chopra, A.K., Geol, R.K.(1999) Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report No. PEER-1999/02. Pacific Earthquake Research Center, University of California at Berkeley
  8. Chopra, A.K., Geol, R.K.(2002) A modal pushover analysis produce for estimating seismic demands for building. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic. 31, pp.561-582 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  9. Miranda, E., Bertero, V.V.(1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design. Earthquake Spectra, 10, pp.357-379 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  10. Nassar, A.A., Krawunkler, H.(1991) Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report No.95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center. Stanford university, CA
  11. Scott, B.D., Park. R. (1982) Stress-strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates. ACI, 79(1), pp.13-27
  12. Shimazaki, K., Sozen, M.A.(1985) Seismic drift of reinforced concrete structures, Special Reseach Paper (Draft), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  13. Song, J.K., Pincheura, J.A.(2000) Spectral displacement demands of stiffness and strength-degrading systems. Earthquake Spectra. pp.817-854