한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 (Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue)

한국문화및사회문제심리학회 (Korean Psychological Association of Culture and Social Issues)
권호 표지

한국 성인의 관계적 자기 구성요인 탐색 및 척도개발

Exploration of the Structure of Relational Self and Development of the Relational Self Scale among Korean Adults

  • 방희정 (이화여자대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 윤진영 (이화여자대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 김아영 (이화여자대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 조혜자 (이화여자대학교 사회과학연구소) ;
  • 조숙자 (이화여자대학교 사회과학연구소) ;
  • 김현정 (이화여자대학교 사회과학연구소)
  • 투고 : 2007.06.18
  • 발행 : 2007.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국인의 관계적 자기를 측정할 수 있는 척도를 개발하고 그 타당도를 검증하고자 실시되었다. 관계적 자기가 다면적이고 구성적인 특성을 가진다고 보는 다중 자기 이론에 근거하여, 문헌 연구를 통해 관계적 자기의 다면적 특성을 측정하는 10 요인 102 문항을 선정하였다. 성인 남녀를 대상으로 102 문항에 대한 내용 타당도 검증, 상관 분석, 탐색적 요인 분석을 실시하여 최종적으로 7요인의 총 31문항을 추출하였다. 7요인은 관계 회피, 타인 의식, 주도성, 도구적 관계, 공감-배려, 지지 받기, 관계 의존 등이다. 서울 및 수도권의 20대에서 60대까지 남녀 649명을 대상으로 요인 구조 및 문항들의 타당도를 구조방정식 모형으로 검증한 결과, 본 연구에서 개발한 관계적 자기 척도가 남녀에게 공통으로 사용할 수 있는 신뢰롭고 타당한 도구임이 확인되었다. 또한, 남녀에 따라 관계적 자기 척도의 하위 요인별 잠재평균 분석을 한 결과, 관계적 자기가 남녀에 따른 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 상관 분석 결과, 관계적 자기의 구성 요인들이 상호의존적 자기해석양식, 자존감, 부모 및 친밀한 사람과의 애착 안정성 등과도 유의미한 관련성을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 개발한 관계적 자기 척도는 관계적 자기를 단일한 요인이 아닌 다양한 구성 개념으로 정의하여, 한국인의 독특한 관계적 자기를 다면적으로 평가할 수 있다는데 그 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to develop and verify the Relational Self Scale(RSS). Based on the theoretical assumptions which relational self is multi-dimensional and constructed in social contexts, 10 categories with 102 items were yielded. In the process of content analysis, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and correlation analysis by administering 102 items to korean adults, 31 items with 7 factors are extracted. The 7 factors are consisted of 'avoidance of relation', 'consciousness of others', 'agency', 'instrumental relation', 'empathy-care', 'perceived support from relation' and 'over-dependency to relation'. Next, Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with 649 korean adults aged from 20's to 60's. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed the RSS as a valid scale. The 7 factors of the RSS fitted well with men and women. The internal consistency of the RSS was proved to be acceptable. The latent mean analysis indicated that the relational self was not significantly different between men and women at 7 factors. Correlation analysis showed that the construct of relational self was significantly related to relational self-construal, self-esteem and attachment to parent and intimacy person. This study has implication in that relational self is defined and assessed as multi-dimensional construct, and that by administering RSS it is possible to evaluate distinctive korean people's relational self.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 2004년도 한국 학술진흥재단의 지원에 의해 연구되었음(FRF-2004-074-HS0005).

참고문헌

  1. 김동직, 한성열 (1998). 개별성-관계성 척도의 제작과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 12(1), 71-93.
  2. 김선업 (1992). 한국사회 연줄망의 구조적 특성. 한국사회학, 26집, 1-33.
  3. 김의철, 박영신 (2006). 한국인의 자기 인식에 나타난 토착문화심리 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(4), 1-36.
  4. 김의철, 박영신 (2006). 한국 사회에서 삶의 질을 구성하는 구성하는 요인들에 대한 탐구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 문제. 12(5), 1-28.
  5. 김지경, 김명소 (2003). 한국 남녀의 관계적 자기의 특성: 다원적 구성요인 탐색 및 타당성 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 9(2), 41-59.
  6. 김지영, 최상진, 김기범 (2001). 심리적 구성체로서의 한국 아줌마 분석. 한국심리학회지: 일반. 20(2), 327-347.
  7. 방희정, 조혜자 (2004). 성 고정관념 활성화가 남녀의 자아해석에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 10(1), 83-106.
  8. 방희정 (2000). 한국 사회에서의 부모-자녀 관계 특성에 대한 발달심리학적 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 6(3). 41-65.
  9. 송지원 (1999). 청소년의 공격성과 자기존중감에 영향을 미치는 변인에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 석사학위청구논문.
  10. 옥정 (1997). 청소년기 애착 안정성과 우울성향의 관계: 지각된 유능감의 매개효과를 중심으로. 이화여자 대학교 석사학위 논문.
  11. 이종구, 이해경, 김명소 (2003). 한국여성의 자기개념의 요인구조와 성차. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 8(2), 1-19.
  12. 장휘숙, 한건환, 전우정 (2002). 부모에 대한 애착과 성역할 정체감. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 15(3), 93-108.
  13. 최상진 (2000). 한국인의 심리학. 서울. 중앙대학교 출판부
  14. 홍세희 (2000). 특별기고 : 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
  15. 홍세희 (2007). 구조 방적식 모형의 이론과 응용. 연세대학교 사회복지학과.
  16. Andersen, S. M. & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109. 619-645.
  17. Armsden, G. C. & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16. 427-454.
  18. Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 592-612.
  19. Aron, A. (2002). Self and close relationships. in M. Leary & J. Tangney(Eds.). Handbook of Self and Identity. (pp. 442-461), NY: Guilford Press.
  20. Ashmore, R. & Jussim, L.(Eds.) (1997). Self and identity. NY: Oxford.
  21. Ashmore, R. & Jussim, L. (1997). Introduction: Toward a second century of the scientific analysis of self and identity. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim(Eds.). Self and identity: Fundamental issues. (pp.3-21), NY: Oxford University Press.
  22. Bakan. D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Beacon Press.
  23. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John(Eds.), Handbook of personality(2nd ed., pp. 154-196). NY: Guilford Press.
  24. Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. Handbook of social psycholoy, 282-316.
  25. Batson, C. D., & Oleson, K. C. (1991). Current status of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, (pp. 62-85), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  26. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The Self. The Handbook of social psychology. Oxford University Press.
  27. Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: The self lost and found. Handbook of personality psychology, Academic Press
  28. Baumeister, R. F. & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross & Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44.
  29. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., Omoto, A. M (1989) The relationship closeness inventory: assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 . 792-807
  30. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss, sadness and depression (Vol. 3) NY: Basic.
  31. Bowlby, J. & MeSH, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52. 664-678
  32. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 15. 159-775.
  33. Brewer, W. & Gardner, W. (1996) Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71. 83-93.
  34. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  35. Bukarko, D., & Daehler, M. W. (2001). Self and value. In Child development: A thematic approach (4th ed.), pp. 405-447, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  36. Chen, S., & Boucher, H. C., Tapias, M. P. (2006) The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2). 151-179.
  37. Chodorow, N. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  38. Clark, M. S., & Ouellette, R., Powell, M.C., Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient's mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53. 94-103
  39. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 . 363-383
  40. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner's.
  41. Cowen, E. L. (2000). Community psychology and routes to psychology wellness. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. New York: Kluwer/ Plenum.
  42. Cox, D. J. Sutphen, J. Borowitz, S. Dickens, M. N (1994). Simple electromyographic Biofeedback treatment for chronic pediatric constipation/encopresis. Biofeedback and Self Regulation. 19.
  43. Cross, S., & Bacon, P., & Morris, M. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78. 791-808.
  44. Cross, S., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122. 5-37.
  45. Cross, S., & Morris, M. (2003). Getting to Know You: The Relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29. 512-523.
  46. Cross, S., Bacon, P., & Morris, M. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78. 791-808.
  47. Donahue E. M., Robins R. W., Roberts B. W., & John O. P. (1993) The Divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64. 834-845.
  48. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  49. Egeland & Farber. (1984). Infant-mother attachment: Factors related to its development and changes over time. Child Development, 55, 753-771.
  50. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, M. S., Schaller, M., & Miller, P. A. (1989). Sympathy and personal distress differences, and interrelations of indexes. New Directions for Child Development, 44, 107-126
  51. Erikson, E. H. (1968a). Identity: Youth and Crisis. NY: Norton.
  52. Fiske, S. & Taylor, M.(1991). Social cognition. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  53. Fiske, S. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621-628.
  54. Foels, R., and Tomcho, T. J. (2005). Gender, interdependent self-construals, and collective self-esteem: Women and men are mostly the same. Self and Identity, 4. 213-225
  55. Frank, E., & Brandstatter, V. (2002). Approach vs. avoidance: Different types of commitment in intimate relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 208-221.
  56. Fromm, (1962) Beyond the Chains of Illusion: My Encounter with Marx and Freud. London: Abacus.
  57. Gilligan C. (1977), In a different Voice. Women's conceptions of the self and morality. Harvard educational. Review. 47. 481-517.
  58. Gilligan C (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, M.A., Harvard Univ. Press.
  59. Harter, S. Waters P. L., Whitesell N. R. (1997) Lack of voice as a manifestation of false self-behavior among adolescents: The school setting as a stage upon which the drama of authenticity is enacted. Educational Psychologist. 32. 153-173
  60. Helgeson, V & Fritz, H (2000) The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior, Journal of Personality. 68(6), 1031-1057.
  61. Higgins, E. T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh(Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-115). New York: Guilford Press.
  62. Higgins, E. T. (1996c). The "self digest": Self-knowledge serving self regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.
  63. Hong S., Malik M. L., & Lee M. K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636-654 .
  64. Hstins C. T., James M. & Stanto, M. D. (2001) Self concept differentiation across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging. 16, 643-654
  65. Jack, (1991.) Silencing the self: Woman and depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  66. Jack, D., & Dill, D. (1992). The silencing the self scale. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 16, 97-106.
  67. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, 1. NY: Dover.
  68. Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. C., Gelfand, M. J., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
  69. Kihlstrom, J., & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 17, (1-47). NY: Academic Press.
  70. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995) Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68. 518-530
  71. Locke, K. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75. 249-267.
  72. Markus & Wurf. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of psychology, 38, 299-337
  73. Markus H. & Cross S. E. (1990) The interpersonal self. Handbook of personality: Theory and research pp.576-608 New York: Guilford Press
  74. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
  75. Markus, H., & Sentis, K. (1982). The self in social information processing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self. (pp41-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  76. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224 253.
  77. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 241-253.
  78. McConnell A. R., Renaud, J. M., Dean, K. K., & Green, S. P. (2005) Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 41. 1-18
  79. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  80. Onorato, R. & Turner, J.(2001). The "I", the "Me," and the "Us": The psychological group and self-concept maintenance and change. Individual self, relational self, collective self. (pp.147-170) PA: Psychology Press.
  81. Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
  82. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955) Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press
  83. Rogers, C. R.(1961). On Becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  84. Rosenberg, S. (1997). Multiplicity of selves. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim(Eds.). Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp.23-45), NY: Oxford University Press.
  85. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
  86. Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., & Pinter, B. (2004). Self-protective memory. In D. R. Beike, J. M. Lampinen, & D. A. Behrend (Eds.). Self and Memory. (pp. 161-180), NY: Psychology Press.
  87. Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Psychological Press.
  88. Sheldon, K., Ryan, R., Rawsthorne, L., & Hardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Jouranl of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393.
  89. Steenkamp (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research. 25, 78-90.
  90. Suh, E. M. (2002) Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
  91. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The Interpretational theory of psychiatry. NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
  92. Sullivan, H. S. (1964). The fusion of psychiatry and social science. NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
  93. Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96. 506-520.
  94. Weber, M. (1946). Class, status, and party. In C. Heller(Ed.), Structured social inequality, 14-24. NY: Macmillan.